MADDOG10's Blog

By now most are aware that Obama without invitation injected himself into the  Trayvon Martin shooting, saying that if he had a son he would look like Martin.   But there was another shooting that took place on March 2, 2008, about which not  only did Obama fail to call the family, he did not give the matter the slightest  regard.

It’s telling that Obama would compare the male progeny he never had to a  drug-using street thug gangsta’ wannabe like Martin and completely ignore the  brutal, cold-blooded murder of a young man who didn’t use drugs, wasn’t involved  in gangs, carried a Spider-Man backpack and was eyeing scholarships to Rutgers  and Stanford. 

Since the Supreme Court legalized the murder of unborn children vis-à-vis  abortion (1973-present), nearly 19 million unborn black children have been  murdered.  Obama not only supports this mass murder of the unborn, but he has  said that Planned Parenthood “does good work” and in a recent speech asked God  to bless the organization.  Depending on which numbers you ascribe to (the CDC  set the number at 43.9 million in 2011), the total number of black Americans is  40-44 million.  Put differently, Obama publicly champions the murdering of  approximately 2.3 unborn black children for every one black child born.

And that is the just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to Obama and  blacks.  Specific to that point, let’s go back to my opening paragraph.  As I  indicated, Obama personally interjected himself into what many, myself included,  believe was a clear case of self-defense when George Zimmerman shot and killed  Martin as Martin was reportedly slamming Zimmerman’s head into the ground. 

Jamiel Shaw Jr. and Sr.

But in the case of Jamiel Shaw Jr., his only offense was being born black –  an illegal-alien Mexican shot him to death because of the color of young Mr.  Shaw’s skin.  Not only has Obama ignored the murder of Jamiel Shaw Jr., but he  has taken it upon himself to push amnesty for the millions of illegal-alien  criminals in the country. 

It is well-known by law enforcement agencies nationwide that the Mexican  mafia and Mexican gangs are committed to ridding blacks from the areas they have  usurped after making their illegal entry into America.  And Obama seeks to  reward these illegals with amnesty.

Jamiel Shaw Jr. was minding his own business, walking from school to his  home.  He was only three blocks away when he telephoned his father to say, “Be  right home dad, I’m right around the corner.”

Tragically, the fact is that Jamiel Shaw Jr. did not make it home.  The fact  is that the next time his father saw him, he was lying face down in a pool of  his own blood just outside his home.  The fact is that Pedro Espinoza, an  illegal-alien Mexican career-criminal gunned down Jamiel Shaw Jr. strictly  because he was black.  The facts are that Jamiel Shaw Jr.’s mother, a U.S. Army  soldier deployed in Iraq at the time, had to fly back alone on a flight that  must have seemed like an eternity.  She had survived combat in a foreign land,  but her child was unable to survive the murderous rampage of illegal-alien  savages in the town she and her family called home.  And, Obama wants to reward  these illegal aliens with amnesty.

Compounding the grief of losing their son, Mr. and Mrs. Shaw are made to  suffer more injury because Los Angeles is a “sanctuary city.”  Simply put, such  “sanctuary cities” are safe havens for illegal aliens in which they can commit  heinous crimes and if they are arrested not be turned over to Immigration and  Customs Enforcement for deportation.  And, Obama fully supports abrogation of  justice.

Jamiel Shaw Jr. is an innocent victim of yet another government-sponsored and  government-approved machination for the extermination of blacks.  And just as  with Planned Parenthood, Obama’s actions unambiguously prove he endorses same. 

Obama is willing to use a situation like that of Martin’s death as a means to  foment racial antipathy toward whites.  But there are no Al Sharptons, no Jesse  Jacksons, no New Black Panther Party protests, no national press coverage, and  NO OBAMA comments in the murder of Jamiel Shaw Jr.

The grotesque elephant in the middle of the room that goes practically  unaddressed –  unlike the fallacious allegations that George Zimmerman shot  Martin because he black – in the case of Jamiel Shaw Jr.: He was murdered by a  Mexican illegal alien specifically because he was black.  And, Obama is  silent.

It’s not just that government collects so much data on Americans that bothers  me.

It’s what the government does and doesn’t do with the data that  makes it worse.

Gohmert was grilling Mueller over the FBI’s abject failure at preventing the  April 15 Boston Marathon bombing by neglecting to investigate their mosque,  founded by Abdurahman Alamoudi, who was convicted of supporting terrorism. He  also pointed out the FBI had a tip from Russia that one of the Tsarnaev brothers  had been radicalized in a visit to Chechnya prior to the attack.

“The FBI never canvassed Boston mosques until four days after the April 15  attacks,” Gohmert said. “If the Russians tell you that someone has been  radicalized and you go check and see the mosque that they went to, then you get  the articles of incorporation as I have for the group that created the Boston  mosque where these Tsarnaevs attended and you find out the name Alamoudi.”

Mueller accused Gohmert of not having his facts straight, for which he should  be cited for contempt of Congress. It is Mueller who didn’t have his facts  straight – even admitting he didn’t know about who founded the mosque.

This little fact was reported in  WND in 2003 – a full year before Alamoudi pleaded guilty for conducting illegal  transactions with the Libyan government and playing a role in a conspiracy to  assassinate Saudi Crown Prince Abdullah! Yet the FBI director didn’t know?  Why didn’t he know? The FBI was conducted multicultural outreaches to the mosque  prior to the attack, yet it was oblivious to its history? Incredible.

That’s an illustration of why too much information in the wrong hands – and  make no mistake about it, the government’s hands are the wrong hands – is so  dangerous. Too much information sometimes obscures the obvious.

Islamic Society of Boston Mosque was, and remains to this day, a breeding  ground for the kind of Muslim extremism that represents a grave threat to  national security and the safety of the American public.

What is Mueller doing about that?

Nothing.

If a church had that kind of history, its charter would have been pulled long  ago and those responsible for aiding and abetting terrorism would be locked up  in Guantanamo. You know it, and I know it. But the FBI closes its eyes to this  kind of violent and explosive hatred when those responsible are followers of  Muhammad.

I encourage you to watch the fiery exchange as it was captured on CSPAN last  Thursday.

It’s time for Mueller to go. I know he is a short-termer and leaving office  soon. But it’s not soon enough.

This guy is not exactly Elliott Ness.

He’s been in the job too long – since a week before Sept. 11, 2001.

He obviously didn’t learn enough from that experience.

It’s time for an immediate change.

It’s also good to know there are at least a few members of Congress who know  what’s really going on in this country – people like Louis Gohmert.

It’s also time to dismantle the surveillance state on general principle. It’s  un-American to the core. But there’s another good reason to destroy it:  Government not only ignores the vital information at its fingertips, it also  misuses it, misinterprets it, fails to connect the dots and misses the forest  for the trees because of the overwhelming amount of data it collects.

I don’t know what’s scarier – the fact that government collects information  from every American surreptitiously or that it uses all the wrong criteria in  figuring out who really represents a threat to the safety and security of our  country and citizenry.

Recognizing he was ultimately in charge and responsible as the accountable  leader of the free world, President Harry Truman had a sign on his desk that  simply said, “The buck stops here.”

I’ve got one, too. All real leaders do. 

You may have noticed that regardless of the numerous scandals plaguing his  administration, our chief executive officer and former community ACORN  organizer, Mr. Obama, has never said he is ultimately responsible or accountable  for anything. Chicago schooled him well in the art of playing dirty  politics.

Not only does he refuse to take any responsibility, Mr. Obama has refused to  tell our gun-running attorney general to appoint an independent counsel to  investigate the numerous scandals that are now derailing his presidency.

Even if Attorney General “Fast and Furious” Eric Holder appointed a so-called  independent counsel, few in the country would believe the individual would be  truly independent. The political fix is always with this  bunch.

Experience more of  Ted Nugent’s no-holds-barred passion and patriotism in his books and WND’s “Ted  Nugent for President!” bumpers sticker

Instead, the American public is told by the supposedly most transparent  administration in history that Fast & Furious was hatched by low-level  personnel at the Phoenix Department of Justice office, that dragging their feet  to approve conservative organizations as tax exempt was the result of an IRS  office in Cincinnati, that the reason our embassy in Benghazi was attacked and  four Americans killed was the result of an Internet video, no one knew anything  about the DOJ monitoring the Associated Press, and that those Philadelphia Black  Panthers weren’t really committing numerous felonies on film, etc., etc., etc.,  ad nauseum.

In other words, the Obama administration believes the American  people have the word “dunce” painted on our foreheads. They believe  they can get away with anything.

In order to get at the truth of what really happened in Benghazi, who really  authorized Fast & Furious, who authorized the delay in processing  conservative tax-exempt organizations and who knew about it, who authorized the  Benghazi lies that Ms. Rice spewed on the Sunday morning talk shows, etc., a  truly independent truth demanding counsel with subpoena powers needs to be  appointed.

And who is the only person who can appoint an independent counsel to  investigate these scandals? Attorney General Holder, who, like his boss,  also refuses to accept responsibility for anything.

In one of the dumber moves by the U.S. Congress, it gave up the  responsibility to appoint independent counsels to the Department of Justice in  1999. Due to this thunderously dumb move, the fox now guards the hen  house.

These scandals are potentially much larger than what Tricky Dicky was charged  with back in 1974 when a young lawyer by the name of Hillary Clinton was on the  House Judiciary Committee’s impeachment inquiry staff. Interestingly, young  Mrs. Clinton, stepchild of her America-hating hero, Saul Alinsky, was  essentially fired from her position for unethical behavior. She should have  been stripped of her law license.

Fast-forward 35 years or so, and Mrs. Clinton was our secretary of state when  Benghazi occurred. Surely Mrs. Clinton would support an independent counsel  to investigate the events that led to the deaths of four Americans on her  watch. What say you, Mrs. Clinton? What difference would that  make?

No one is affirming guilt by the Obama administration. What Americans  want is the truth and for our politicians to accept responsibility and to be  accountable.

The buck stopped with Harry Truman. No one knows where the buck stops  with the Obama administration, and it is high time that we the people demand  answers and accountability. Transparency has two meanings, and we can see clean  through our government’s never-ending scams these days.

One of the many bombshells he dropped was the news that a certified document  examiner with 20 years’ experience had closely examined the “birth certificate”  and had concluded that it was the most obvious forgery he had seen in those 20  years.

The examiner was not making a party political point, for he is a registered  Democrat.

Mike Zullo’s investigation has now continued for almost two years. He has  amassed many thousands of pages of evidence. His draft investigation report is  already more than 300 pages long, and he reckons it will be 700 pages before it  is complete.

There is some explosive evidence that he has not yet disclosed, because it  concerns third parties who may be connected with the forgery.

His determination is commendable. But there is one question the Obots raise  that now needs an answer. If it is so very plain that the “birth certificate” is  forged, why has Sheriff Arpaio been unable to put the matter before any court?  Why is Obama still in the White House and not in the jailhouse?

Part of the answer lies in the terrified reluctance even of Fox News to cover  the story properly. Fox calls itself “fair, balanced, and unafraid.” But it is  afraid. Very afraid.

A concerned citizen sent every congressman, every senator, every state  governor and attorney general, every member of Obama’s Cabinet, every member of  the Democratic and Republican National Committees and every member of the  Supreme Court a copy of my own briefing paper summarizing the evidence for  forgery. Fewer than half a dozen replies were received. There are a lot of  fraidy-cats in your governing class.

I asked one congressman why he had done nothing about the forgery. He  replied: “It is unquestionably a forgery. We all know that. But you, with your  experience of what the left will do to the reputations of those who challenge  it, know that if any of us were to raise this issue we would be subjected to the  same hatred, vilification and organized reputational damage that you have had to  endure because you challenged them on climate change.”

He added, “Scientifically and economically, your challenge was correct. But  they didn’t care about that. They did their level best to trash your reputation  anyway. I value my reputation, and I dare not take the risk of having it  destroyed.”

So there is no media pressure to bring the matter to court, and no political  pressure either. A state of such fear and funk now subsists in the United States  that no one will touch the birth certificate issue.

And that is a shame, because the in-your-face forged “birth certificate” is  arguably the biggest news story of our generation. In defiance of your  Constitution, the current occupant of the White House clings to office even  though his endorsement of the bogus document creates serious doubt about whether  he is entitled to hold that office, and still more serious doubt about his  fitness to hold it even if he were constitutionally entitled.

Naturally, the Obots have done their best to interfere with the sheriff’s  investigation. A trumped-up Justice Department investigation of him for  allegedly doing his job eventually ran into the sand. And an attempt to recall  him almost immediately after he was handsomely re-elected has also now failed. 

Now that other sheriffs and law enforcement officers have had some elements  of the fraud explained to them, even if Mike Zullo and the sheriff were unable  to persuade the attorney general of Arizona to do his constitutional duty, it is  now clear that Obama will not survive the fraud. It is only a matter of time  before some public-spirited citizen takes the short, simple, inexpensive stops  that will bring him to book.

Step 1: Commission reports from court-certified specialists in typewriter  analysis and separately in electronic document forgery.

Step 2: Refer the reports to a mathematician so that he can confirm the  near-zero probability that a document containing as many errors as this one can  be genuine.

Step 3: Put the reports and the mathematical analysis before a federal  district court and ask it for orders obliging Hawaii to release the original  documentation to forensic specialists acting for law enforcement.

There is actually no need for any further investigation. There is quite  enough evidence to obtain such orders right now.

Consider, for instance, the typewriter irregularities in the White House  document. Some specialists say they do not like to rely on typewriter anomalies.  However, as part of the case against a suspect document, they have their place. 

Typewriter analysis has a unique value in that, unlike electronic anomalies  that require specialist knowledge to understand them, typewriter anomalies are  visible. Anyone can see them once they are pointed out. They are as plain as the  nose on your face.

Especially for WND’s readers, I have updated a report that I compiled last  year on the numerous typewriter errors in the White House document. The  pdf document is available at this link.

Here is my challenge to the Obots. Provide a rational explanation for the  irregularities I have identified in my report. Whether or not the typewriter  errors are as serious as I consider them to be, there are many other errors.

So know this: Mike Zullo’s net is closing in, and – however many reputations  you try to trash for the sake of saving your fallen hero – Black Jesus is  doomed.

My American Freedom Defense Initiative, or AFDI, colleague Robert Spencer and  I flew to Tennessee Tuesday to join throngs of patriots and freedom lovers, all  happy warriors who had converged in Manchester, Tenn., to oppose the latest  Obama administration salvo against the freedom of speech – a seminar led by an  Obama-appointed U.S. attorney on how civil rights laws could and should be used  to shut down speech deemed “inflammatory” against Muslims (a label that has been  used before to shut down truthful speech about jihad and Islamic  supremacism).

This was a fight for the very soul of America in a very small town:  Manchester, Tenn., a town no bigger than 10,000 people. (Almost 2,000 people  were there.) This was the perhaps unlikely venue for a seminar led by a U.S.  attorney and an FBI special agent on how “inflammatory” speech against Muslims  violated civil rights laws. Nowhere was it ever explained how there could be  honest examination of Islam’s teachings of jihad that wouldn’t be “inflammatory”  – and that was just the point. 

What was really beautiful was that when the event started, more than 600  people couldn’t even get in, but they stayed outside and held a freedom rally.  They weren’t missing much – unless they were in the mood to be admonished and  hectored as xenophobes, bigots and racists by an Islamic supremacist spokesman  and two Obama officials who steadfastly refused to address the elephant in the  room: the reality of jihad terror and Islamic supremacism, no matter how many  times the boisterous crowd called them on their nonsense.

U.S. Attorney Bill Killian gave a PowerPoint presentation on hate crimes and  hate speech. From beginning to end, it was full of condescension, smears,  charges that the crowd was racist and thinly veiled threats that truthful speech  about Islam could be prosecuted. Never once did he address the fact that people  aren’t concerned about Muslims because of racism and xenophobia, but because of  the reality of jihad terror and the uniform denial and obfuscation, and  victimhood posturing that follows from Muslim communities after every jihad  attack.

Killian even stooped so low as to claim a sharp rise in “religiously  motivated hate crimes,” without ever informing the crowd that he was lumping in  anti-Semitic hate crimes (which are at worldwide record levels, largely due to  Islamic anti-Semitism) with anti-Muslim hate crimes. FBI special agent Kenneth  Moore was little better. Both echoed the Islamic supremacist speaker’s opening  remarks, all about how the people of Tennessee had to learn to be welcoming of  people who were different.

The media coverage of our free-speech rally and the anti-free-speech event  was typically deceptive and mendacious. One would think that the industry that  has the most to lose from restrictions on free speech would fight the fascism.  But you would be wrong. These tools are so in the bag for the Obama regime that  the knaves are attacking the patriots (and there are many of us) who are  standing between freedom and tyranny.

The headline of every news story should have been “Obama’s Department of  Justice seeks to criminalize free speech.” Instead, the headlines spun the  Muslim victimhood myth narrative: Muslim outreach program disrupted by  racist-islamophobic-anti-Muslim-bigots. Nothing on the constitutional putsch.  They didn’t bury the lede; they never recovered the body.

USA Today’s headline was “Tenn. Muslim group’s forum disrupted by protesters.” UPI  went with “Protesters, hecklers disrupt Muslim forum in Tennessee.” And  WBIR-TV’s headline was “Protesters disrupt Tenn. Muslim group’s meeting.” Nowhere in  the coverage did the media deign to mention why folks were there. People came to  protest Killian’s vow to criminalize criticism of Islam on social media. Folks  were boisterous, and well they should be. Does anyone think we should go quietly  into the night? The Department of Justice and FBI, taking their orders from  Islamic supremacist groups, said the meeting would be an open forum. It was even  titled “Public Discourse.” But they changed the rules. Instead of an open forum,  they said no questions. Instead, we were told to write questions on index cards.  Yeah, uh huh. And, of course, at the end of hours of condescension and  accusations of racism, they only read two questions.

Yes, people called them on it. Yes, people grimaced and moaned when Holder’s  name was mentioned. He is second only to Obama in greatest threats to our  freedoms.

I was there. It was a great American moment. Americans aren’t going to sit  quietly while our freedom of speech is taken away, and are never, ever, going to  submit and stop telling the truth about the jihad that threatens us all. We are  an army.