Comments for "Huge Antarctic ice chunk collapses"
March 25, 2008, 2:54 pmHuge Antarctic ice chunk collapses
WASHINGTON (AP) -- A chunk of Antarctic ice nine times the size of Manhattan has suddenly collapsed, putting an even larger glacial area at risk.
Satellite images show the runaway disintegration of a 220-square-mile chunk in western Antarctica.
British scientist David Vaughan says it's the result of global warming.
The rest of the Connecticut-sized ice shelf is holding on by a narrow beam of thin ice and scientists worry that it too may collapse. Larger, more dramatic ice collapses occurred in 2002 and 1995.
Comments
Comment by jarasan - March 25, 2008, 11:23 pm
Comment by LOTTOMIKE - March 26, 2008, 12:45 amhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vbRaukW861Q&feature=related
Comment by LOTTOMIKE - March 26, 2008, 2:03 amhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X2kgFyZzKMo
When you have one of those rocks that are 10 miles wide hitting the earth, at 40,000 miles a minute, bad things happen...lol
Comment by Tenaj - March 26, 2008, 9:22 amAnd what gets me is that there are people who turn global warming into something political just because they hate the person who got kudos for their take on it and whether it's true or not is not a concern, just disproving it is because he said it.
Global Warming is not new but disbelief in it took on furiously when the name Al Gore was attached to. As far as presenting facts, they can always be twisted and presented in a way to prove a point.
There was a test on "how much do you know about global warming" and talk about leaning toward disproving that the earth is warming. I couldn't help but chuckle. Each question was geared towards how cold the earth was getting. The test taker was unaware that it was slanted and 10 different questions could easily proven the opposite. So whether you believe the earth is warming or cooling is up to the person but when the only reason to disprove it is political I think is - I won't insult.
Comment by jarasan - March 26, 2008, 9:40 am
Comment by jarasan - March 26, 2008, 10:44 amSome rocks that were found in Austrailia, dated back over 4 billion years showed water during it's existence back then. Even some crystal rocks have shown to contain water in little pockets within the rock. Some clays have water too. And of course many many comets, as Jarasan stated.
Comment by Tenaj - March 26, 2008, 4:40 pmYou must be a Lottery Post member to post comments to a Blog.
Register for a FREE membership, or if you're already a member please Log In.




BTW...There were no SUVs 11,000 years ago, and 11,000 years before that...lol