What Am I Doing ?

Published:

Updated:

I am a lifelong atheist and non-believer in any type of psychic abilities or realities. I am a computer programmer by profession. KWHILBORN challenged me and I embarked on a program of time travel. Twice a week, I make my mind travel into the future and see the drawings of the California SuperLotto. My predictions, so far, are much better than random. They have shaken me up. I am starting to believe that if I can do this well from a totally cold start, after only nine time travel sessions, I should be able to hone this skill. If I can only triple my current rate of hits, I can make a living doing this.

Don't ask me how it works, why it works or if it should work. I have a hard time believing I am doing this at all. People have always challenged me that I don't have an open mind. Well, my mind is open, and numbers are coming in that make some sense.

There is also a timing element, not surprising with time-travel, I guess. Look at my prediction of the bonus number 15 on 6/19 and 6/23. Then they hit on 7/3 and 7/7. Also look how I have predicted 7 in the second column several times in recent weeks, and now they have hit twice. It's not sufficient to just look at one row of predictions and compare it to one row of drawings.

I have been working on getting the confusion of the temporal planes down to a minimum. Since there is an infinite number of drawings in the future, it's not clear to me I go to the right ones. So I miss the dates. Perhaps I should play every prediction for 10 drawings automatically. Another thought that comes to mind is find a larger set and wheel it. This, too, could mitigate the temporal confusion.

Believe me, this is cuckoo in my book, but being the engineer that I am, I will just continue to collect the data and see what happens.

Entry #8

Comments

Avatar baghead -
#1
time travel? did you happen to go past the time you died? for your sake i hope not if your an atheist
Avatar dragon -
#2
Yes, I knew you'd be thinking this. As a matter of fact, I have posted just such flavored remarks in this forum, and will probably continue to do so. If you're interested, study up on the completely wild subject of "remove viewing" online. You'll find 100,000 references on Google. Until a few months ago I didn't know this stuff even existed, and now I am doing it, or rather, I think I am doing it. As it turns out, using numbers is probably one of the best ways to test these abilities. Numbers are pretty conclusive evidence of success or failure. I like it sofar. I will be the first to concede if I drop back to statistical noice and therefore oblivion.
Avatar hypersoniq -
#3
ARV (associative Remote Viewing), interesting enough to get the government's attention (project stargate). just about all of the "how to" pages have you associate something like a picture or a color to associate to something to which you are trying to see... I didn't get that. Numbers seem to be the best logical choice to test accuracy, they tended to avoid the subject of accurate projection.

There is one thing that did escape me at the time, they all seem to agree there are apexes in the 'energy' required to perform non-linear time based viewing (particularly future) when the local "sidereal" times were at their peak.
they did not explain what that peak was or how to determine the LST based on your local standard time.

It sounds like you have a good method of data collection for your experiment. Good Luck!
Avatar dragon -
#4
ARV is something I have just started investigating in this quest. I am skeptical, but there is too much, apparently well documented, evidence that it works to some degree, and with certain limitations, to completely discard it. You can go way out there very quickly in this.

Why haven't the leading remote viewers won the lotteries? James Randi probably loves this fact.

Joe McMoneagle, Stargate's viewer number 001 and probably the most famous viewer, completely missed 9/11 and all that happened with it in his future predictions in the book "The Ultimate Time Machine." Now I'd think it would be completely impossible to miss 9/11 in a scan of the near future and cataclysmic events, looking from 1998 forward.

Post a Comment

Please Log In

To use this feature you must be logged into your Lottery Post account.

Not a member yet?

If you don't yet have a Lottery Post account, it's simple and free to create one! Just tap the Register button and after a quick process you'll be part of our lottery community.

Register