Listen my brutha, MLK would've been doing the exact same thing in terms of addressing what happened overall. You must remember, whites were lynching, shooting, and beating blacks to no end and for NO APPARENT REASON OTHER THAN BECAUSE THEY COULD DO IT AS BLACKS' SUPPERIORS. So, naturally, you're inclined to inject MLK as a prop to serve your own purpose as a 'peacemaker' which is good in its' own right. But, although Brown may have done something wrong at a convenience store, he didn't kill anyone and wasn't armed at all. Furthermore, at the onset of the shooting, the two incidents were NEVER EVEN CONNECTED and the stories are STILL CONFLICTING. I do agree that criminals have a definite part in what may happen to them as a result of wrong-doing but, you need to analyze things on a case by case basis and not generalize everything.

Obviously, you've forgotten about how whites lied about what little Emmet Till (14 yrs. old) didn't do. They lied and said that little boy 'flirted' with a white woman...that he whistled at her. Picture that, America. Your own 14 yr. old son that you've raised right whistling and flirting with a grown and probably married woman. Yeah, it ain't happening!!!! The jury bought into it, though, and let those MURDERERS OFF WITHOUT BLINKING AN EYE. Granted, the two incidents are different but the basic idea remains the same. Gonna let him make it today and not take that 'Uncle Tom' route as some will but, his current position is gonna come back and bite him...HARD. Mark my word on this day, America.