"Crickets"

Carson would not win anyway. I like him very much.

Hey Speedy, you see how those LIARS, HYPOCRITES, and CONSPIRERS like to huddle up over in the flea bitten dog house? It goes to show just how much shame they really have...A LOT. Otherwise, they'd be over here SLAMMING BEN CARSON AND CONGRATULATING GLENN BECK. Yeah? But, it's all good with me as I know they're just SAVING FACE. I'm still gonna TAX THAT A$$, though...just a matter of time and they know it. Now, for the REAL BUSINESS AT HAND. Why the hell didn't emilyg post this particular entry? I mean, after all, emilgy LOVES HER SOME BEN CARSON, America. Let's see just how much she supports Benny...among other things:

Link:
1) http://blogs.lotterypost.com/emilyg/2014/10

Actual entry:

Saturday, October 18, 2014

Dr. Ben Carson..

When radio host Hugh Hewitt asked Dr. Ben Carson if he would accept the U.S. surgeon general nomination from President Barack Obama, the famous neurosurgeon was definitive in his response.

"No, no," Carson replied immediately. "Because if I would, if I were going to serve in that position, I would have to serve under someone that I trusted."

Hewitt pressed further: "If he said I will not interfere with the guidance you give, we need someone to rally the country around being calm and appropriately prepared, you'd really, you'd say no to the president of the United States?"

"Yes, absolutely," Carson said.

posted by emilyg at 12:26

Comments in response to entry:

5 Comments:
CARBOB said...
You have to respect anyone who sticks to their principals. How can you work with or for anyone, you don't trust?
12:35 PM      emilyg said...
CARBOB - I have much respect for Dr. Carson. Really like him.
12:55 PM      MADDOG10 said...
I have a lot of Respect for Dr. Carson. He is a man of his word....
4:10 PM      jarasan said...
Don't forget barry ducks responsibility always, he would throw moochelle under the bus if he thought it was necessary.
6:36 PM      reddog said...
Notice the Dems are speechless?? They should be!!
9:58 PM     
Post a Comment

<< Home

2) Here's one on Eric Holder...you know, the 'Hands Up Was Bogus' guy?

   
Thursday, September 25, 2014

Interesting - on Holder

As a longtime, current employee of the Justice Department told us, Mr. Holder and his subordinates have "racialized and radicalized" the department "to the point of corruption." They have "embedded politically leftist extremists in the career ranks who have an agenda that does not comport with equal protection or the rule of law; who believe that the ends justify the means; and who behave unprofessionally and unethically. Their policy is to intimidate and threaten employees who do not agree with their politics, and even moderate Democrats have left the department, because they were treated as enemies by administration officials and their lackeys. Another black employee who has worked for the Justice Department for decades said to me, 'There is no justice left in Justice under this administration.'"
Illustration of Eric Holder and the corruption of the Justice Department by Alexander Hunter/The Washington Times
Illustration of Eric Holder and the corruption of the Justice Department by ... more >

As this poll demonstrates, the American people recognize that Mr. Holder is an ideologue who considers himself part of Mr. Obama's political team first and the attorney general a very distant second. His first loyalty has been to helping the president break, bend, ignore or fail to enforce the law, doing untold damage to our constitutional system and the rule of law.

As former Justice Department prosecutor Andy McCarthy has said, the Justice Department under Mr. Holder has become "a sort of full-employment program for progressive activists, race-obsessed bean counters and lawyers who volunteered their services during the Bush years to help al Qaeda operatives file lawsuits against the United States."

There is no way to know how long it will take to repair the damage that Mr. Holder has d

Read more: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/sep/16/fund-von-spakovsky-the-injustice-of-eric-holder/#ixzz3EMycF6cN
Follow us: @washtimes on Twitter

posted by


3) Ferguson...

http://blogs.lotterypost.com/emilyg/2014/09

4) Ha ha ha, LMBAO on this dumb chit!!!

http://blogs.lotterypost.com/emilyg/2013/11

Entry followed by comments:
Wednesday, November 27, 2013

Poll - Obama viewed as biggest failure..

Rankings released by YouGov/Economist show that Ronald Reagan is viewed as the greatest president of the last 100 years, while Obama is viewed as the "biggest failure."

The poll asked respondents "to rate each president [since Theodore Roosevelt] in six categories: great, near great, average, below average, failure, and don't know."

Results showed that Reagan bested Franklin D. Roosevelt (FDR) and John F. Kennedy (JFK) in a tight race for the top spot. 32 percent of the respondents categorized Reagan as "great," while 31 percent labeled FDR "great" and 30 percent chose JFK.

When it came to ranking presidents viewed to be a "failure," Jimmy Carter and Richard Nixon fared better than Obama.

Of those polled, 22 percent of respondents rated Carter a "failure," while 30 percent gave that same ranking to Nixon. But Obama took first place at the bottom of the list, with 37 percent of respondents choosing him as the biggest "failure" of all.

Follow AWR Hawkins


5) America, this next entry JUST DOES IT FOR ME!! emilyg HAD TO BE DRUNK WHEN SHE POSTED THIS CHIT:

http://blogs.lotterypost.com/emilyg/2013/12

Entry and comments:

Friday, December 27, 2013

Greetings...

O ALL MY DEMOCRAT FRIENDS:

Please accept with no obligation, implied or implicit, my best wishes for an environmentally conscious, socially responsible, low-stress, non-addictive, gender-neutral celebration of the winter solstice holiday, practiced within the most enjoyable traditions of the religious persuasion of your choice, or secular practices of your choice, with respect for the religious/secular persuasion and/or traditions of others, or their choice not to practice religious or secular traditions at all.

I also wish you a fiscally successful, personally fulfilling and medically uncomplicated recognition of the onset of the generally accepted calendar year 2014, but not without due respect for the calendars of choice of other cultures whose contributions to society have helped make America great.

Not to imply that America is necessarily greater than any other country nor the only America in the Western Hemisphere.

Also, this wish is made without regard to the race, creed, color, age, physical ability, religious faith or sexual preference of the wisher.

TO ALL MY REPUBLICAN FRIENDS:

Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year!


6) THIS....AMERICA:

http://blogs.lotterypost.com/emilyg/2014/10

Entry and comments:

Friday, October 17, 2014

Hypocrisy of Liberals...

!

The hypocrisy of liberals never ceases to amaze me. In fact, liberals would be comical if their ideas and actions weren't so destructive. Liberals cannot seem to grasp that if they bring our country down with their anti-American ideas, they will go down with it. Further, while doing their best to undermine all that is good about America liberals never seem to con

Dang it! Not all of it posted. I'll make it short and sweet on Ben Carson and why he changed his views on gays. First of all, I went all the back to January 2012 and didn't find a single entry on Carson in her blog. Carson came on the Republican scene on November 4, 2014 after not being affiliated with any party. Cool. Now, for the main course. Here's the link and excerpt stating how he felt about insurance companies in 1996 and what to do about it:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ben_Carson

Excerpt:

In a 1996 interview, he said that he found the "concept of for profits for the insurance companies" absurd. He continued, "The first thing we need to do is get rid of for-profit insurance companies. We have a lack of policies and we need to make the government responsible for catastrophic health care".[33]

Okay, Obama tried to fix all that and get the middle man out but, Republicans are still not satisfied because a BRUTHA FIGURED IT OUT AND GOT IT IMPLEMETED. NOW, THEY WANNA GO RIGHT BACK TO WHAT BEN COMPLAINED ABOUT. GO FIGURE.

Okay, let's see just why Carson changed his views on gays and it's within the same link under Marriage, Homosexuality, and Evolution:

Excerpts:

Carson described his opposition to same-sex marriage on Hannity, saying: “Marriage is between a man and a woman. No group, be they gays, be they NAMBLA, be they people who believe in bestiality, it doesn’t matter what they are. They don't get to change the definition.”[49] Carson’s comments drew criticism for using "gays" in the same sentence as pedophiles and practitioners of bestiality. A group of Hopkins students petitioned that he be replaced as the university’s commencement speaker.[49][50]

Carson withdrew as Hopkins’s commencement speaker and apologized, saying that “the examples were not the best choice of words”, adding that the Bible “says we have an obligation to love our fellow man as ourselves, and I love everybody the same—all homosexuals”.[50][51] And he said on CNN that he loved all people, whether gay or straight.[49] Carson added, “I was trying to say that as far as marriage was concerned, it has traditionally been between a man and a woman and no one should be able to change that.”[52]

Whoah!!! Didn't I just basically say the EXACT SAME THING RECENTLY? I SAID NOT TO JUDGEMENTAL OF PEOPLE AS THEY CAN CHANGE THEIR WAYS FOR RIGHT AND THE LORD WILL FORGIVE THEM. AS SUCH, WE HAVE AN OBLIGATION TO LOVE OUR FELLOW MAN AS WE DO OURSELVES!!! Yes, America, Ben Carson GOT IT RIGHT AND GLENN BECK SLAMMED HIM FOR IT!!!! GLENN BECK HATES WHAT THUSE SAITH THE LORD OUR GOD...AND SO DO THE EXTREMISTS WITHIN THESE BLOGS. From January 2012 all the way to October 18, 2014 there's not a single entry on Ben Carson in her blogs outside of the one above. You know I've done my diligence.

Oh, but now, SHE LIKES HIM VERY MUCH, America!!!! Yet, and still, trusee had to post the link on the latest developments on Ben Carson's views on gays. We, well, well...that must mean that emilyg feels the SAME WAY ABOUT GAYS WHICH IS ALSO HOW OUR PRESIDENT FEELS ABOUT GAYS...HENCE HIS SUPPORT FOR THEIR CIVIL RIGHTS!!!!!!! HE JUST CHOSE NOT TO GET THE BIBLE INVOLVED. ACTION ALWAYS SPEAK LOUDER THAN WORDS...AND HE DOESN'T JUDGE GAYS. HE SIMPLY DOES WHAT THE BIBLE SAYS FOR HIM TO DO. Now, you know a brutha like me is gonna be watching EVERYTRHING EXTRA CLOSE FROM NOW ON. Trust me on this.

When there are multiple answers to a question and you answer it you are giving an opinion. The questions are called gotcha questions in politics. Politicians are to govern by written law not by opinion.

The problem with pathological liars is that they can't remember them all. One thing I can say about a democrat is that they don't coward out and jump ship every time something is said negative about one of its members. The repubs on the other hand, run like thieves in the night.

Okay, so Carson answered the question WITH HIS "OPINION" OF WHAT THE BIBLE SAYS? JAP69, IS THIS WHAT YOU'RE SAYING? Furthermore, I suppose Obummer, or whatever other names you may have for him, GOVERNS BY HIS OPINIONS? Soooo, ENSURING CIVIL RIGHTS TO GAYS IS A MATTER OF GOVERNING BY OPINION AND NOT LAW...CORRECT? THE LAW SAYS THAT BECAUSE THEY'RE GAY, THEY HAVE NO RIGHTS...CORRECT? THEY PAY TAXES, HAVE PRETTY GOOD JOBS BASED ON MANY SURVEYS OF SUCCESSFUL GAY PEOPLE,>>>> "THEY BOTHER NO ONE", AND THEY'RE NICE PEOPLE WHEN YOU ENGAGE IN A CONVERSATION WITH THEM.

Let me explain something to you and all your friends. Ben Carson may be Republican but, I can guarantee that THIS MAN KNOWS BETTER THAN TO JACK AROUND WITH THUS SAITH THE LORD...UNLIKE ALL OF YOU. TO KNOW TO DO RIGHT AND THEN NOT DO IT...HE WILL HOLD YOU ACCOUNTABLE AS THERE IS A SPIRITUAL ASPECT IN ALL OF THIS. You want my proof, don't you JAP69? Gladly...here ya go:

JAMES 4:17

http://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/James-4-17/

Therefore to him that knoweth to do good, and doeth it not, to him it is sin.


Now, you and all your no good friends go and wrestle with God on that. You people are pitiful.

posted by Lucky Loser : 11:18 AM
_______________________
That is why we have a separation of Church and State in the United States. Religious view points do not govern when we have a nation of multiple Religions. Was Roe vs Wade decided on Religious teachings?