Powerball lottery officials suspected fraud: how could 110 players in the March 30 drawing get five of the six numbers right? That made them all second-prize winners, and considering the number of tickets sold in the 29 states where the game is played, there should have been only four or five.
Many different brands of fortune cookies come from Wonton Food's Long Island City factory.
But from state after state they kept coming in, the one-in-three-million combination of 22, 28, 32, 33, 39.
It took some time before they had their answer: the players got their numbers inside fortune cookies, and all the cookies came from the same factory in Long Island City, Queens.
Chuck Strutt, executive director of the Multi-State Lottery Association, which runs Powerball, said on Monday that the panic began at 11:30 p.m. March 30 when he got a call from a worried staff member.
The second-place winners were due $100,000 to $500,000 each, depending on how much they had bet, so paying all 110 meant almost $19 million in unexpected payouts, Mr. Strutt said. (The lottery keeps a $25 million reserve for odd situations.)
Of course, it could have been worse. The 110 had picked the wrong sixth number - 40, not 42 - and would have been first-place winners if they did.
"We didn't sleep a lot that night," Mr. Strutt said. "Is there someone trying to cheat the system?"
He added: "We had to look at everything to do with humans: television shows, pattern plays, lottery columns."
Earlier that month, an ABC television show, "Lost," included a sequence of winning lottery numbers. The combination didn't match the Powerball numbers, though hundreds of people had played it: 4, 8, 15, 16, 23 and 42. Numbers on a Powerball ticket in a recent episode of a soap opera, "The Young and the Restless," didn't match, either. Nor did the winning numbers form a pattern on the lottery grid, like a cross or a diagonal. Then the winners started arriving at lottery offices.
"Our first winner came in and said it was a fortune cookie," said Rebecca Paul, chief executive of the Tennessee Lottery. "The second winner came in and said it was a fortune cookie. The third winner came in and said it was a fortune cookie."
Investigators visited dozens of Chinese restaurants, takeouts and buffets. Then they called fortune cookie distributors and learned that many different brands of fortune cookies come from the same Long Island City factory, which is owned by Wonton Food and churns out four million a day.
"That's ours," said Derrick Wong, of Wonton Food, when shown a picture of a winner's cookie slip. "That's very nice, 110 people won the lottery from the numbers."
The same number combinations go out in thousands of cookies a day. The workers put numbers in a bowl and pick them. "We are not going to do the bowl anymore; we are going to have a computer," Mr. Wong said. "It's more efficient."
I think maybe the workers enjoy picking the numbers...and will hate going to computerized draws
The sixth number being 40 instead of 42 would've been better, saving Powerball $19 million since everyone would've split the $25 million jackpot. $76,000 post-tax cash for 111 winners.
I think maybe the workers enjoy picking the numbers...and will hate going to computerized draws
The sixth number being 40 instead of 42 would've been better, saving Powerball $19 million since everyone would've split the $25 million jackpot. $76,000 post-tax cash for 111 winners.
That's a really good point about the states saving money. They must have been hating life after seeing all those 5+0 winners! I don't think they mind as much seeing a jackpot winner, because that comes out of the shared jackpot pool, rather than out of the individual state funds.
[...The workers put numbers in a bowl and pick them. "We are not going to do the bowl anymore; we are going to have a computer," Mr. Wong said. "It's more efficient."...]
With all due respect, Mr. Wong, The bowl method worked!
...the fortune cookie company should keep the bowl and forget the computers.
Okay, so they pick the numbers out of a bowl and it hits. The logical thing to do next is to do a computer drawing so it will completely scramble the odds and sensibility of a system that worked well in the first place. Yeah!
Someone needs to refer Mr. Wong to the forums on this site. Does anyone in the outside world know about this computerized drawing scandal??!!
With all the lottery software on the market that claim to pick the winning numbers a good percent of the time, one would think the same thing would have happened with a group of players using the same lottery software. I suspect that most lottery software have no strategy to pick any particular combinations or this would have happened by now. If the those fortune cookie makers ever wanted to start selling their cookies as lottery software, they will have some good testimonials from some actual winners.
I'm going to take this in a bit of a different direction. I saw this story posted on msn.com today. This story is big news?????? This happened a month and a half ago. This another illustration of how far behind the ball the main stream media is.
As for the the fortune cookie method. I don't think it would be too smart for people to out and start playing fortune cookie numbers. I think it would be extremely odd for another fortune cookie number to hit again anytime soon.
I think maybe the workers enjoy picking the numbers...and will hate going to computerized draws
The sixth number being 40 instead of 42 would've been better, saving Powerball $19 million since everyone would've split the $25 million jackpot. $76,000 post-tax cash for 111 winners.
Oh man, if the sixth number had been 40 instead of 42, people would have rioted in the streets!
I think maybe the workers enjoy picking the numbers...and will hate going to computerized draws
The sixth number being 40 instead of 42 would've been better, saving Powerball $19 million since everyone would've split the $25 million jackpot. $76,000 post-tax cash for 111 winners.
I think maybe the workers enjoy picking the numbers...and will hate going to computerized draws
The sixth number being 40 instead of 42 would've been better, saving Powerball $19 million since everyone would've split the $25 million jackpot. $76,000 post-tax cash for 111 winners.
That's a really good point about the states saving money. They must have been hating life after seeing all those 5+0 winners! I don't think they mind as much seeing a jackpot winner, because that comes out of the shared jackpot pool, rather than out of the individual state funds.
[...The workers put numbers in a bowl and pick them. "We are not going to do the bowl anymore; we are going to have a computer," Mr. Wong said. "It's more efficient."...]
With all due respect, Mr. Wong, The bowl method worked!
...the fortune cookie company should keep the bowl and forget the computers.
Waah !!
The states were crying..... They had to pay more than expected on that draw.
Whatever !!!
Okay, so they pick the numbers out of a bowl and it hits. The logical thing to do next is to do a computer drawing so it will completely scramble the odds and sensibility of a system that worked well in the first place. Yeah!
Someone needs to refer Mr. Wong to the forums on this site. Does anyone in the outside world know about this computerized drawing scandal??!!
Sometimes people say in public what they, in private, are TOLD to say.
If Mr. Wong "don't want no extra visits from the health inspector, building inspector" etc, he'll
go to "computerized drawings" like everyone else.
With all the lottery software on the market that claim to pick the winning numbers a good percent of the time, one would think the same thing would have happened with a group of players using the same lottery software. I suspect that most lottery software have no strategy to pick any particular combinations or this would have happened by now. If the those fortune cookie makers ever wanted to start selling their cookies as lottery software, they will have some good testimonials from some actual winners.
RJOh
I'm going to take this in a bit of a different direction. I saw this story posted on msn.com today. This story is big news?????? This happened a month and a half ago. This another illustration of how far behind the ball the main stream media is.
As for the the fortune cookie method. I don't think it would be too smart for people to out and start playing fortune cookie numbers. I think it would be extremely odd for another fortune cookie number to hit again anytime soon.
shame on wong......SIGN THE PETITION to eliminate computerized drawings.
I think maybe the workers enjoy picking the numbers...and will hate going to computerized draws
The sixth number being 40 instead of 42 would've been better, saving Powerball $19 million since everyone would've split the $25 million jackpot. $76,000 post-tax cash for 111 winners.
Oh man, if the sixth number had been 40 instead of 42, people would have rioted in the streets!
Not much better.