You last visited November 23, 2008, 4:55 am
|
A lottery ticket run to the border
|
Topic locked. Last post more than one year ago by . 13 comments.
|
|
|
Print
E-mail
Link
|
|
Alabama United States Member #18137 June 27, 2005 307 Posts Offline
|
| Posted: December 13, 2005, 2:34 pm - IP Logged |
|
hsvscubaski said:
"But Siegalman is not the answer"
Amen to that!
We do not need anti-lottery people on Lottery Post. This is a pro-lottery site.
And just what makes YOU think I'm anti-lottery? Ever read any of my posts? BTW, I sure don't see YOUR Lottery Post screen name highlighted in yellow.
You don't live in Alabama. Siegalman is NOT a good choice for govenor of this state, regardless of his position on the lottery. The lottery vote didn't pass last time, in part because people didn't trust Siegalman's politicing and cronyism.
Get a clue before you start hurling accusations.
|
|
|
Birmingham United States Member #19166 July 21, 2005 82 Posts Offline
|
| Posted: December 13, 2005, 11:10 pm - IP Logged |
|
hsvscubaski said:
"But Siegalman is not the answer"
Amen to that!
We do not need anti-lottery people on Lottery Post. This is a pro-lottery site.
And just what makes YOU think I'm anti-lottery? Ever read any of my posts? BTW, I sure don't see YOUR Lottery Post screen name highlighted in yellow.
You don't live in Alabama. Siegalman is NOT a good choice for govenor of this state, regardless of his position on the lottery. The lottery vote didn't pass last time, in part because people didn't trust Siegalman's politicing and cronyism.
Get a clue before you start hurling accusations.
Good Grief CASH Only!!! With as many posts that you have, you should know better than to stick your neck out like that.
Just out of curiosity...why are you freeloading on Lottery Post? It appears that you have superseded your "gentleman's agreement" of only taking up a limited amount of web space for free. Sure, you may have been a paying member previously and you can't afford it right now, so maybe it is wrong of me to wildly accuse you riding our backs. So, I will not do that...just as you should not jump to conclusions.
By the way, Siegalman was a crook, a liar, and a backstabber. You can have him if you want him.
Oh, and another thing...you're welcome for the space I've purchased for you.
Cheers
"Life is like a box of chocolates...you can speculate on what you're going to get through trial and error"
|
|
|
|
Australia Member #17389 June 11, 2005 225 Posts Offline
|
| Posted: December 14, 2005, 3:46 am - IP Logged |
|
Big business calls the shots, what's new? Follow the money - look at campaign donations!
But relax everyone! If you live in a state without a lottery, you don't have to waste time and money crossing state lines. Just call Massachusetts lottery from the comfort of your own home, it' a toll free number, order over the phone and the tickets will be shipped to you. I don't know how much Massachusetts makes from out-of-state sales, it must be millions.
If you live in a state without a lottery and would like your state to establish one, I recommend voting with your pocket and subscribing to the Massachusetts lottery games. Also tell your local politicians - let them know where the money is going.
|
|
|
Darlington, S.C. United States Member #3762 February 12, 2004 133 Posts Offline
|
| Posted: December 14, 2005, 9:28 am - IP Logged |
|
hsvscubaski said:
"But Siegalman is not the answer"
Amen to that!
We do not need anti-lottery people on Lottery Post. This is a pro-lottery site.
And just what makes YOU think I'm anti-lottery? Ever read any of my posts? BTW, I sure don't see YOUR Lottery Post screen name highlighted in yellow.
You don't live in Alabama. Siegalman is NOT a good choice for govenor of this state, regardless of his position on the lottery. The lottery vote didn't pass last time, in part because people didn't trust Siegalman's politicing and cronyism.
Get a clue before you start hurling accusations.
Good Grief CASH Only!!! With as many posts that you have, you should know better than to stick your neck out like that.
Just out of curiosity...why are you freeloading on Lottery Post? It appears that you have superseded your "gentleman's agreement" of only taking up a limited amount of web space for free. Sure, you may have been a paying member previously and you can't afford it right now, so maybe it is wrong of me to wildly accuse you riding our backs. So, I will not do that...just as you should not jump to conclusions.
By the way, Siegalman was a crook, a liar, and a backstabber. You can have him if you want him.
Oh, and another thing...you're welcome for the space I've purchased for you.
Cheers
Here we go again. Another Lottery Post member feeling superior because they pay for the extra features.
I don't feel like I am riding on anyone's back or that you or any other paying member has made a purchase for the space I use when I make a post. I would think that everyone is welcome to come here and share their views as long as they abide by the rules.
I don't know Cash Only's situation but I can easily afford to upgrade. I just don't have any reason to. I don't want to use any wheels or see any draw history. I don't have any interest in using any lottery systems nor do I care to have a home page.
If I ever really get into the lottery where a gold or platinum membership would benefit me I wouldn't hesitate to upgrade, so please don't get all high and mighty just because you are doing something that makes sense for YOU. With the lottery I get all the exercise I need.
In futility.
|
|
|
|