|
|
Lottery winner followed careful spending plan
Coastal Georgia United States Member #2703 October 30, 2003 1868 Posts Offline
|
| Posted: February 28, 2007, 7:57 pm - IP Logged |
|
This has nothing to do with the lottery, but I thought some people might find this interesting..at least people around here were surprised. I just thought of it since we were talking about using old photos. (sorry, but my mind has its own segue system) My birthday is in March so I received a notice that my driver's license needs to be renewed. In FL your license is replaced every 6 years. (I get a new registration sticker annually by ordering it online or by phone.) My neighbor went up to the DMV and had to take an eye test and got her photo snapped. I just took the notice I received in the mail and got online, using the web address on the card. I typed the confirmation code provided and paid my fee online with a credit card. 2 weeks later I got a new style license with all sorts of holograms and it has my old photo from March 2001 in 2 places and my signature. I never realized that, when they took my picture 6 years ago, they kept it on file in a database. Maybe this isn't new, but I was surprised. So that's the way to get your license and registration if you don't want to fight traffic or stand in line. More good news is that the picture is now 6 years old and in 6 more years (exp date on the new license is Mar 2013) I'll be 12 years older than I was when it was taken!! LOL Good little segue, JXP---The picture thing just shows that as we get older, we look the same, so they save the expense and time of taking a new one. But I bet you have not aged at all in those 6 years !!! I KNOW I haven't ... LOL
|
|
|
New Jersey United States Member #2418 September 25, 2003 582 Posts Offline
|
| Posted: February 28, 2007, 9:24 pm - IP Logged |
|
I have a question. What kind of a system was it where he had to play the same set of numbers for 3 years? Is that a system at all? Well it doesn't really matter at this point. System or luck, he won it either way.
But this is a great story. The man is doing exactly what he wanted. Who are we to judge and criticize what he has done with his money? Someone will always criticize the way we handle THE WIN (if we ever won). The guy is on his way to achieve the goal he set for himself and has helped others along the way. His family is debt free. His nephews' and nieces' don't have to worry about how they will pay for college. His family members also get $12,000 a year. Simply GREAT. It would have been hard to be cool and composed after the win (he tried to remain anonymous) and think everything through about the future. Congrats to him.
|
|
|
|
United States Member #50662 March 1, 2007 14 Posts Offline
|
| Posted: March 1, 2007, 3:08 am - IP Logged |
|
hi all, I Just registered to make a post and hope many more to come. This story spoke to me because I'm also an avid cyclist. A 11K bike is a bit much though, Mine costs 11h and it's more than enough. It seems the guy rides bikes for the fitness, not because of the environment. He owns gyms and does a spinning class. Number picks/predictions ads are amazing, i can't imagine anyone paying money for them. there is a free site I refer to and it offers picks on the last six months draws, i've only seen it hit 4 of six on the regular lottery out of 18 different numbers. Guess it depends on how the numbers fall.
|
|
|
New Member  Windermere, FL United States Member #50670 March 1, 2007 30 Posts Offline
|
| Posted: March 1, 2007, 9:07 am - IP Logged |
|
>>$45 million: Safe, low-risk investments such as municipal bonds<< >>$35 million: Aggressive investments like oil and gas and real estate<<"My total net worth right now is at an unofficial value of $128 to $130 million. We've done very well for the first year and a half." First of all, I am happy that he won and has chosen a wise path to grow his assets but to reach $1 Billion net worth in 12 years, his assets have to grow at a rate of 24% (net after taxes) annually. I have a hard time believing his portfolio has grown to $128-$130 million in just a year and a half. Not to be too critical but I have broken down what his current asset allocation would have had to grow to achieve this number. Low risk investments such as municipal bonds currently return 2-3% tax free, let's go ahead and just say 3% to make it simple. $45-million @ 3% for 1.5 years compounded annually=$47,050,000 This means that his $35 million investment in gas, oil, real estate would have to have grown like this: Basis: $35 million, 230% return in 1.5 years= $80.5 million, factor in 35% fed tax($29.18 million) and 7.7% Idaho state tax($6.19 million) $80.5 million minus $29.18 million/$6.19 million= $45,130,000 in gains $45,000,000 basis on muni bonds ($ 2,050,000 return on bonds) $35,000,000 basis for aggressive investments ($45,130,000 net gains from investments) Net total from all investments = $127.18 million Add in all other assets and his stated net worth reaches $128-$130 million I'm sorry but a return of 15-20% for the past year and a half would have been a lot more believable than a whopping 230% return in the same time frame.
|
|
|
New Member  California United States Member #44029 July 22, 2006 9 Posts Offline
|
| Posted: March 1, 2007, 12:47 pm - IP Logged |
|
This whole thing stinks to me. I remember when this guy won. I even went back and read his Powerball winner's story to see if it changed. He used " a series of numbers he's been playing for years". I find it hard to believe neither he or his publicist mentioned his system??? This reads like a press release for his lottery system.
|
|
|
North Brunswick NJ United States Member #39431 May 8, 2006 5397 Posts Offline
|
| Posted: March 1, 2007, 6:21 pm - IP Logged |
|
He got his money . Now we can get our. Over 267 millions in MEGA MILLION$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ Appearing this friday on your favorite lottery station!!
|
|
|
Coastal Georgia United States Member #2703 October 30, 2003 1868 Posts Offline
|
| Posted: March 1, 2007, 6:40 pm - IP Logged |
|
>>$45 million: Safe, low-risk investments such as municipal bonds<< >>$35 million: Aggressive investments like oil and gas and real estate<<"My total net worth right now is at an unofficial value of $128 to $130 million. We've done very well for the first year and a half." First of all, I am happy that he won and has chosen a wise path to grow his assets but to reach $1 Billion net worth in 12 years, his assets have to grow at a rate of 24% (net after taxes) annually. I have a hard time believing his portfolio has grown to $128-$130 million in just a year and a half. Not to be too critical but I have broken down what his current asset allocation would have had to grow to achieve this number. Low risk investments such as municipal bonds currently return 2-3% tax free, let's go ahead and just say 3% to make it simple. $45-million @ 3% for 1.5 years compounded annually=$47,050,000 This means that his $35 million investment in gas, oil, real estate would have to have grown like this: Basis: $35 million, 230% return in 1.5 years= $80.5 million, factor in 35% fed tax($29.18 million) and 7.7% Idaho state tax($6.19 million) $80.5 million minus $29.18 million/$6.19 million= $45,130,000 in gains $45,000,000 basis on muni bonds ($ 2,050,000 return on bonds) $35,000,000 basis for aggressive investments ($45,130,000 net gains from investments) Net total from all investments = $127.18 million Add in all other assets and his stated net worth reaches $128-$130 million I'm sorry but a return of 15-20% for the past year and a half would have been a lot more believable than a whopping 230% return in the same time frame. Welcome to the post, Jill34786 !! I knew someone would figure out this thing. Thanks for the insight... DD
|
|
|
NY United States Member #24178 October 16, 2005 1739 Posts Offline
|
| Posted: March 1, 2007, 9:38 pm - IP Logged |
|
I'm with Jill. I think everything this guy says needs to be taken with more than just a grain of salt. Let's start with what he really started with. The cash value was about $125 million. The top brackets for federal and Idaho income tax were 35 and 7.8%, so unless he had some serious deductions almost all of that $125 million would have been taxed at a total of 42.7%. The remaining 57.2% of $125 million would only be $71.5 million. He could have made charitable contributions that would lower the tax bill enormously, but that would still reduce his net. He may have gotten a check for $85 million after the mandatory withholdings, but I don't see how he'd net much over $72 million.
Even if he did start with $85 million, Jill is about right about the return on his investments. Even allowing for not paying taxes until he cashes out, putting $45 million into a safe investment is unlikely to yield more than $50 million, so he's claiming that $35 million grew to about $80 million in a little better than a year and a half. Allowing 21 months, it would take an annual return of 60% to increase $35 million to $80 million. That's possible but fairly unlikely unless he was stupid enough and lucky enough to put it all into just 1 or 2 things that happened to do really well. While there's a chance that he could continue to see overall returns thathigh and have his billion dollars in 10 or 12 years, taking that kind of risk is also a great way to lose most of the money he has in aggressive investments. Some of his story sounds like he's a level headed guy who isn't likely to get into real trouble, but it also sounds to me like the guy has some sort of agenda he's working on and step one is to pile it pretty deep.
|
|
|
United States Member #10921 January 23, 2005 863 Posts Offline
|
| Posted: March 2, 2007, 12:51 am - IP Logged |
|
The thing I need to figure out is what algorithm he used. He hinted that he took the 15 numbers that came out the most in the last 6 months, which is a very basic frequency count, and maybe he used one of those balanced wheeling systems, as even with his system you would face huge odds to match 5 out of 15 plus the bonus (? out of ?)... I grabbed an old data file from 2005 and tossed in a special PB loader into my big program and tested for that drawing. It was 39-24-05-28-07 Powerball: 36. The only high numbers were the 05 and 07, the other 3 blend in with many others. The 05 & 07 also came out in a recent previous drawing at that time. I will endeavor to determine how the other numbers were predicted, including the Bonus Ball, and hopefully I can apply it for Saturday. I invite any of you to do the same and compare notes. Finally.. his joy comes almost entirely from how much money he can accumulate. This is fine for him but if it were me I'd have picked Annuity and put 1/2 in safe investments each year and the other (up to) 1/2 to enjoy or to invest some of that more aggressively. it would be like hitting a 10M lottery every year for 26 years! I'd like to know also how he assembled a financial team, are these from a corporation or just his smart friends? (he could have asked the advice of Hillary Clinton, she turned $1000 into $100,000 or something like that!) IF one really wanted to give someone a large amount w/o limit all they would need to do is leave it in your SUV in a briefcase and tell them where it's parked!
|
|
|
Atlanta United States Member #6302 August 11, 2004 1370 Posts Offline
|
| Posted: March 2, 2007, 9:06 am - IP Logged |
|
>>$45 million: Safe, low-risk investments such as municipal bonds<< >>$35 million: Aggressive investments like oil and gas and real estate<<"My total net worth right now is at an unofficial value of $128 to $130 million. We've done very well for the first year and a half." First of all, I am happy that he won and has chosen a wise path to grow his assets but to reach $1 Billion net worth in 12 years, his assets have to grow at a rate of 24% (net after taxes) annually. I have a hard time believing his portfolio has grown to $128-$130 million in just a year and a half. Not to be too critical but I have broken down what his current asset allocation would have had to grow to achieve this number. Low risk investments such as municipal bonds currently return 2-3% tax free, let's go ahead and just say 3% to make it simple. $45-million @ 3% for 1.5 years compounded annually=$47,050,000 This means that his $35 million investment in gas, oil, real estate would have to have grown like this: Basis: $35 million, 230% return in 1.5 years= $80.5 million, factor in 35% fed tax($29.18 million) and 7.7% Idaho state tax($6.19 million) $80.5 million minus $29.18 million/$6.19 million= $45,130,000 in gains $45,000,000 basis on muni bonds ($ 2,050,000 return on bonds) $35,000,000 basis for aggressive investments ($45,130,000 net gains from investments) Net total from all investments = $127.18 million Add in all other assets and his stated net worth reaches $128-$130 million I'm sorry but a return of 15-20% for the past year and a half would have been a lot more believable than a whopping 230% return in the same time frame. I think you overlooked one very powerful form of investing when considering "aggresive" style investments. This is commonly referred to as Hedge or Option trading. Option trading (Hedge funds are a bit more complex, but use similiar concepts) are a powerful tool in one's investment technique to rapidly increase one's value. A simplistic example would be this, you purchase 100 shares of a stock for $10 per share. Then you sell a Call Option of $15 for $1 per share (profit of 10% spread over 3 months). Now, if the stock value does NOT reach $15 by the end of the option life, you get to repeat the process up to 4 times a year. Now, your pulling off a whopping 40% annual return (even higher if the stock price continues to increase during the year) from your original investment $1,000 <-- Initial Value of 100 shares of stock at $10 Share 1st trade $100 <-- Value of 1 Stock Option (100 shares at $1 per share) 2nd trade $100 <-- Value of 1 Stock Option (100 shares at $1 per share) 3rd trade $100 <-- Value of 1 Stock Option (100 shares at $1 per share) Stock value increases to $15 or so a share 4th trade $150 <-- Value of 1 Stock Option (100 shares at $1.50 per share) Net Annual is $450 for a whopping return of 45%, not allowing for dividends or increased value of the stock Now, the stocks he doesn't option trade with will reduce his annual overall return down to the low to mid 20% range. So, you see, his idealistic goal is very feasible. Also, if he has the right kind of trust account setup, the taxes are deferred. And, just in case you were wondering, about 15 years ago (just prior to me making a lot of really stupid financial life decisions) I had transfered my 401k monies from a Company I was working for to a Stock IRA account. The monies initially transferred was $14,800 (and some change, dont recall the exact figure). Over the period of one year, I generated well over $17,000 from that money (and yes again, due to a lot of really stupid and probably inappropiate decisions, I have none of it now) utilizing the method I just illustrated above. Had I had more monies available at the time, I think I could have had even greater returns because I would have had a larger pool to work from. All said and done, in the end, the right approach to investment and the proper management, one could easily double their value over a short period of time. And as I like to say, an open mind does lead to some interesting oppurtunities. Sir Metro
|
|
|
Illinois United States Member #47157 September 23, 2006 3696 Posts Offline
|
| Posted: March 2, 2007, 9:32 am - IP Logged |
|
Nice story. I have a question for anyone out there that can answer. How in the hell can one pay all of those taxes at the time of winning and still be taxed depending on how much money one chooses to give away What is going on in this country? You cant do what you want with your money even after you have paid the "income tax" ?
|
|
|
New Member  Windermere, FL United States Member #50670 March 1, 2007 30 Posts Offline
|
| Posted: March 2, 2007, 9:46 am - IP Logged |
|
Thanks for the welcome DD. I had occassionally peeked my head in on this forum in the past couple years but just recently decided to sign on.
|
|
|
New Member  Windermere, FL United States Member #50670 March 1, 2007 30 Posts Offline
|
| Posted: March 2, 2007, 10:22 am - IP Logged |
|
Hi Metro, I understand what you're implying as I also trade options using a variety of strategies. I allocate roughly 10% of my assets toward options as I feel it is inline with most seasoned traders. Obviously, if someone were to start trading with something in the $25k range than that allocation may very well be 50% if not more. I just can't see this MM winner investing most of his $35 million in options, perhaps $3 million but that would still be an incredibly large amount. Let's assume that even if he had a hedge position such as a front month strangle on Diamond trust (DIA) even purchasing 500 contracts of the Mar 123 call/121 put which were selling for $1.20/$1.05 respectively this morning, that itself would "only" be an investment of $112,500 before commissions. 25 position similar to that would yield a cost of roughly $3 million which would be fine if the open position is liquid but there are many thinly traded options that rarely exceed volumes of 1000 contracts or more. While it is certainly attainable to achieve annual returns of 1000-2000% trading options, those are usually in the minority with total assets under $100k. If Brad Duke's portfolio continues to grow at it's current rate (net 62% every 1.5 years) he would be worth in excess of $473 Billion by age 59! Jill
|
|
|
Wandering Aimlessly United States Member #25708 November 5, 2005 4379 Posts Offline
|
| Posted: March 2, 2007, 10:26 am - IP Logged |
|
Nice story. I have a question for anyone out there that can answer. How in the hell can one pay all of those taxes at the time of winning and still be taxed depending on how much money one chooses to give away What is going on in this country? You cant do what you want with your money even after you have paid the "income tax" ? If you type "Gift Tax" in a search engine, you'll see lots of articles on this same subject. In fact, if you use the Search feature on this board and type the words "gift" and "tax" you'll also find lots of interesting comments like yours. The IRS site defines what can be considered a tax exempt gift. I totally agree with you, not only about the gift tax but the inheritance tax. Forget the lottery for a minute. Say you work hard your whole life and put away money to give your children and grandchildren a better life. You die and leave $5 million and, even though you always paid your income and property taxes, your heirs have to pay taxes on what you had left when you died. (which is why it really should be called a "death tax") That's why it is so important for people of means to make sure their estate has been well managed. Not only money is taxed, but any property or items of value. Once you reach the maximum lifetime gift level, you can pay as much as 45% additional gift tax above & beyond your income tax. (It was even more a few years ago, but has been decreasing.) There are lots of ways to get around the $12,000 annual limit without cheating, however. A savvy estate planner or attorney should be able to offer valuable advice. So to answer your question - No, you can't just do what you want with your money.
|
|
|
New Member  Windermere, FL United States Member #50670 March 1, 2007 30 Posts Offline
|
| Posted: March 2, 2007, 10:58 am - IP Logged |
|
Just for kicks, I crunched the numbers in the event Brad Duke were to allocate 100% toward aggressive investments which has already returned 230% in the past year and a half. Within 9 years, he would be worth in excess of $167 Billion while reaching $25.714 Trillion by the age of 59. That would certainly make both Bill Gates and Warren Buffett seem inferior.
|
|
|
|