Welcome Guest
Log In | Register )
You last visited August 29, 2008, 2:55 am

S. Jersey couple claims $87 million share of jackpot

Topic locked. Last post more than one year ago by KY Floyd. 19 comments.

Page 2 of 2 BackGo to Page
Print E-mail Link
tnlotto1's avatar - logo
Standard Member
Experienced
nashville
United States
Member #50355
February 18, 2007
907 Posts
Offline
Posted: March 20, 2007, 6:28 pm - IP Logged Bottom

maybe their neighbors are jealous and that is why they talked so much to the press but im sure the neighbors wont get any part of the money now that they leaked that information without the couples permission.

Standard Member
Senior
Pennsylvania
United States
Member #17377
June 10, 2005
1053 Posts
Offline
Posted: March 20, 2007, 7:18 pm - IP Logged Bottom Top

Its nice when someone wins no matter the age. Im against * Too old to appreciate it anymore* and *too young* to know how to manage it attitude. Either you have the financial finese to know how to manage money or ya dont. Its that simple! Surely I've been a testament of penny wise and pound foolish in my life time, and age had little to do with it.  This couple has my support for laying low and keeping any one at bay. May they enjoy retirement , may they know the goodness of family, and spend with a kind heart :)

I wish the winds of change would head back to my state and into my home for some financial windfall, but since I dont have insurance its okay that I get a drizzle of good fortune from the lottery:)

Bravo to the NJ claimants!

kindness is a small gesture accepted by another 

 

 

Raven62's avatar - binary
Standard Member
Top 25 Poster
Guru
New Jersey
United States
Member #18150
June 28, 2005
10544 Posts
Online
Posted: March 20, 2007, 8:17 pm - IP Logged Bottom Top

Instead of immediately coming forward and holding a news conference — as did the truck driver from Georgia who won the other half of the jackpot - the Messners hired a financial consultant and a lawyer and waited almost two weeks.

 

Very smart....stay tuned to see which one of the MM winners disappears easier.

He may not have collected his Winnings the way you would have, but he's got the Jackpot!

A mind once stretched by a new idea never returns to its original dimensions!

vulcanclassic15's avatar - Lottery 067
Standard Member
New Member
New Member
Ashtabula
United States
Member #20105
August 6, 2005
10 Posts
Offline
Posted: March 20, 2007, 8:39 pm - IP Logged Bottom Top

Bad neighbors, If I won & my neighbors told the press this information without asking me, well, lets just say they would not like the "new" neighbors they would have when I give my house away!! Not hard to find that speacial neighbor no one wants around!! I might would even pay to move there curent junk pile in the front yard to the home I give them. See if the old neighbor still wants to give out that private information!

  Plowing my way to a win!!!

Standard Member
Senior
Coastal Georgia
United States
Member #2703
October 30, 2003
1868 Posts
Offline
Posted: March 21, 2007, 9:00 am - IP Logged Bottom Top

He may not have collected his Winnings the way you would have, but he's got the Jackpot!

Yes he does-and apparently that's all that matters....

 

                               

              

 

 

Standard Member
Experienced
md
United States
Member #14305
April 20, 2005
436 Posts
Offline
Posted: March 21, 2007, 2:13 pm - IP Logged Bottom Top

These people seem to have the appropriate intentions - to stay the hell out of the media's glare, and funky neighbors paths.  God bless them, and may they and their family enjoy every bit of this Jackpot!  Smart people it looks like.

YeeHaw's avatar - Lottery 041
Standard Member
New Member
New Member
California
United States
Member #44029
July 22, 2006
5 Posts
Offline
Posted: March 21, 2007, 11:31 pm - IP Logged Bottom Top

    You can remain anonymous in NJ. Wonder why they didn't go that route?

Standard Member
Advanced

United States
Member #10921
January 23, 2005
724 Posts
Offline
Posted: March 21, 2007, 11:40 pm - IP Logged Bottom Top

As far as I know the QP machines don't care about duplicates, but maybe if all of the available sets are used they have no choice but have some numbers sold twice. I can't imagine the MM Lottery suddenly stopping QP sales due to "all available sets taken." They'd also have to check the #s you pick yourself and say "sorry, can't use these - already taken". Nobod would like that! I don't know how many total tickets were out for that drawing. More likely is just that even a very fast central computer could not spit out random sets fast enough while checking a vast central data file what with all of the machines going at once and numbers pouring in from all over. It might be feasible on a smaller local game, but there is really no reason why to forbid duplicates. Nobody's saying, oh drat, it was only 183 million!

If I won and I stayed in the house and away from everyone that would become boring and depressing. I could do that now without winning 1 cent. Some kind of social life, activities and fun (within reason) are necessary. It's just a matter of common sense, knowing who your real friends are and what places or situations to stay away from.

MegaWinner's avatar - Lottery 029
Standard Member
Regular
New Jersey
United States
Member #50733
March 3, 2007
326 Posts
Offline
Posted: March 22, 2007, 12:50 am - IP Logged Bottom Top

As far as I know the QP machines don't care about duplicates, but maybe if all of the available sets are used they have no choice but have some numbers sold twice. I can't imagine the MM Lottery suddenly stopping QP sales due to "all available sets taken." They'd also have to check the #s you pick yourself and say "sorry, can't use these - already taken". Nobod would like that! I don't know how many total tickets were out for that drawing. More likely is just that even a very fast central computer could not spit out random sets fast enough while checking a vast central data file what with all of the machines going at once and numbers pouring in from all over. It might be feasible on a smaller local game, but there is really no reason why to forbid duplicates. Nobody's saying, oh drat, it was only 183 million!

If I won and I stayed in the house and away from everyone that would become boring and depressing. I could do that now without winning 1 cent. Some kind of social life, activities and fun (within reason) are necessary. It's just a matter of common sense, knowing who your real friends are and what places or situations to stay away from.

But QP's aren't generated by a "central server".  They are generated on the green machine that you buy them from.

Sun Smiley I got my fingers crossed ready to win!!! Sun Smiley

Standard Member
Advanced
NY
United States
Member #24178
October 16, 2005
1317 Posts
Offline
Posted: March 24, 2007, 12:52 am - IP Logged Bottom Top

As far as I know the QP machines don't care about duplicates, but maybe if all of the available sets are used they have no choice but have some numbers sold twice. I can't imagine the MM Lottery suddenly stopping QP sales due to "all available sets taken." They'd also have to check the #s you pick yourself and say "sorry, can't use these - already taken". Nobod would like that! I don't know how many total tickets were out for that drawing. More likely is just that even a very fast central computer could not spit out random sets fast enough while checking a vast central data file what with all of the machines going at once and numbers pouring in from all over. It might be feasible on a smaller local game, but there is really no reason why to forbid duplicates. Nobody's saying, oh drat, it was only 183 million!

If I won and I stayed in the house and away from everyone that would become boring and depressing. I could do that now without winning 1 cent. Some kind of social life, activities and fun (within reason) are necessary. It's just a matter of common sense, knowing who your real friends are and what places or situations to stay away from.

Since the entire purpose of QP's is to choose the combinations randomly, they definitely "don't care" about duplicates. Like everything else about the lottery duplicates are a simple function of probability, and you start getting duplicates an extremely long time before you come close to using each combination once.  Once 0.01% of the combinations have been sold, if all subsequent combinations were picked randomly each of them would have a 0.01% chance of matching one of the previously picked combinations. 0.01% is 1/10,000th,which sound pretty small, but 1/10,000th of the tickets sold in even a small MM drawing is substantial number. 1/10,000th of the possible combinations is 17,571 tickets, and even a small MM drawing sells that many in less than 10 minutes (as an average over a 4 day sales period). Sell the first 17,571 tickets and we should expect that 1 of every 10,000 tickets sold after that will match one sold in the first 10 minutes. Sell 53,000 more tickets and  there should be 3 that match one from the first 10 minutes. Then you've sold 4/10,000th of the combinations and you would expect to have 4 repeats for each 10,000 tickets. Just one hour after sales started you could expect a dozen repeated combinations. By the time sales stop there will be at least 13 million tickets sold, and about 0.5%, or 65,000, of the combinations are likely to have been repeated.

That's what we can expect when the jackpot is under $20 million. Once 50% of the combinations have been played we would expect that every other ticket sold would match a previous combination. For the huge sales that went with the huge jackpot about 70% of combinations would have been played, so of the last 100 tickets sold we should expect that 70 of them were duplicates of a combination that had already been played. The chances of having two winners is the same as the percentage of combinations that have been sold twice, so there was about a 20% chance of having two winners.

That's all based on numbers being selected randomly, but  not everybody selects their numbers randomly. Combinations with birthday numbers or other numbers that a lot of people consider significant are even more likely to be repeated, possibly many times.