Welcome Guest
Log In | Register )

Quick Links

USA Mega Lottery Results Gadget for Windows Vista

NetConnect

Internet Domains, simple and cheap

Find a domain name:

  Home

Petition for True Lottery DrawingsMegaplier Petition
You last visited November 21, 2009, 8:51 am

Lawyer in $315 million lottery lawsuits ordered to pay fine

Mar. 22, 2007, 10:00 a.m.

Mega Millions Mega Millions: Lawyer in $315 million lottery lawsuits ordered to pay fine

A lawyer representing three people who sued their co-workers seeking a share of their $315 million lottery win was ordered Tuesday to pay a nearly $382,000 fine.

Orange County Judge Michael Brenner ordered attorney Mark H. Williams to pay the seven lottery winners after determining he pursued the lawsuits knowing the allegations lacked merit.

The amount was the equivalent to legal fees incurred by the "Lucky Seven," who pooled money to buy the winning Mega Millions multi-state lottery ticket, said defense attorney Larry S. Zeman.

Speaking on behalf of his clients, Zeman said they felt "vindicated by the legal system."

"The system did its job and held responsible the people who brought these baseless claims," Zeman said.

Williams was not in court when the judge imposed the sanction. An attempt to reach him at his Long Beach office was unsuccessful.

Within the last 30 days, Brenner dismissed lawsuits brought by Williams on behalf of three co-workers who claimed they deserved a share of the jackpot because of an oral agreement that everyone would be included whenever they pooled their money to buy tickets.

A lawsuit filed by a fourth co-worker also was dismissed.

The defendants — six lab technicians and a receptionist at Kaiser Permanente Medical Center in Garden Grove — contend it was their first time they took part in the office pool.

Each put in $3 for 21 tickets. With the winning ticket, each took home a lump sum payment of about $20 million.

The Nov. 15 jackpot was the second largest in state history and one of the largest in the United States.

AP

We'd love to see your comments here!  Register for a FREE membership — it takes just a few moments — and you'll be able to post comments here and on any of our forums. If you're already a member, you can Log In to post a comment.

8 comments. Last comment 3 years ago by HiYoSilver.
Page 1 of 1
RJOh's avatar - chipmunk
Standard Member
Top 25 Poster
Elite
mid-Ohio
United States
Member #9
March 24, 2001
10546 Posts
Offline
Posted: March 22, 2007, 12:29 pm - IP Logged

I would like to see more such decisions handed down, maybe it would stop people with fruitless claims suing lottery winners or trying to black-mail them into a settlement to avoid the additional expense and delay of going to court.

* What happens most *
 * will most likely happen again *

Todd's avatar - Cylon 2
Platinum Member
Lottery Post Administrator
Top 25 Poster
Chief Bottle Washer
Elite
New Jersey
United States
Member #1
May 31, 2000
17052 Posts
Offline
Posted: March 22, 2007, 12:47 pm - IP Logged

I would like to see more such decisions handed down, maybe it would stop people with fruitless claims suing lottery winners or trying to black-mail them into a settlement to avoid the additional expense and delay of going to court.

I Agree!

 

Check the State Lottery Report Card
What grade did your lottery earn?

 

Sign the Petition for True Lottery Drawings
Help eliminate computerized drawings!

 

Sign the Megaplier Petition
Let all Mega Millions players multiply their prizes!

Raven62's avatar - binary
Standard Member
Top 25 Poster
Guru
New Jersey
United States
Member #18150
June 28, 2005
14575 Posts
Offline
Posted: March 22, 2007, 12:51 pm - IP Logged

This one is for the History Books: They Dismissed the Lawsuit and they Fined the Attorney! Thumbs Up

A mind once stretched by a new idea never returns to its original dimensions!

Jill34786's avatar - imgp0102md0
Standard Member
New Member
New Member
Windermere, FL
United States
Member #50670
March 1, 2007
30 Posts
Offline
Posted: March 22, 2007, 4:05 pm - IP Logged

The judge should have also fined the 4 co-workers who brought up the suit. Attaching a portion of their wages would have been fair as well as sweet justice.

Avatar
Standard Member
Regular
California
United States
Member #47277
October 1, 2006
270 Posts
Offline
Posted: March 22, 2007, 4:20 pm - IP Logged

The item in the article I found very interesting was that the defendants ... contend it was their first time they took part in the office pool.  Therefore how it would have been very difficult to prove there was an  oral agreement that everyone would be included whenever they pooled their money to buy ticket.  That may have been why the judge took the action he did.  Had there been a history of purchases with a patttern of activity developed, it might have been different.

konane's avatar - Tiny Butterfly
Platinum Member
Guru
Atlanta, GA
United States
Member #1288
March 13, 2003
2630 Posts
Online
Posted: March 22, 2007, 4:25 pm - IP Logged

Totally awesome precedent in both regards ..... hope it's the beginning of a national trend which eliminates frivolous lawsuits of all types.

RJOh's avatar - chipmunk
Standard Member
Top 25 Poster
Elite
mid-Ohio
United States
Member #9
March 24, 2001
10546 Posts
Offline
Posted: March 22, 2007, 4:58 pm - IP Logged

The judge should have also fined the 4 co-workers who brought up the suit. Attaching a portion of their wages would have been fair as well as sweet justice.

Unless their lawyer included the phrase "I don't get paid unless you get paid" in his contract, they still have to come up with some money to pay him.

* What happens most *
 * will most likely happen again *

Avatar
Standard Member
Regular
MI
United States
Member #20554
August 14, 2005
51 Posts
Offline
Posted: March 23, 2007, 8:32 am - IP Logged

Too bad this is not done in most lawsuits where people are sued needlessly. Make the loser pay the legal fees and you would see a 90% drop in lawsuits over night.

The same thing should happen if you are accused of a crime and acquitted. Had a friend accused of getting kickbacks for construction jobs. It cost him over 20 thousand to defend himself and then the case was dropped because the company had made a mistake. He couldn't sue to recover his money because it was a government agency that initiated the claim.