All times shown are Eastern Time (GMT-5:00) | Home -> Forums -> Lottery News -> Vancouver lottery winner loses in divorce case Wandering Aimlessly United States Member #25708 November 5, 2005 4403 Posts Offline | | Posted: April 17, 2007, 6:06 pm - IP Logged | |
I wouldn't be trying to hide assets...oh my wife would know that our investment account would be huge...she would just think that I found a nice line of wealthy clients and businesses in my line of work...she would never know were the proceeds came from...yes, I know I would have to file taxes and that the lottery commission would send me a W-2G with "Lottery Commission" clearly printed on the outside of the envelop...that is why I would direct all lottery commission mail to a newly opened Post Office Box at my local post office and when we have our taxes done by a tax pro, I would cover up the line for lottery/gambling winnings as we review it so that she never sees the source (that might be the weak link in all my plans to keep it secret from my wife). And no, she doesn't surf lottery websites...she's more into the fundamental christian websites. It's really none of my business OldSchool. I am certainly no expert when it comes to marriages. I just would never keep a secret like that from my spouse. Anyway, I think your wife may be much smarter than you think. If you are self-employed and use Form 1040 along with Form SE and Schedule C, etc., it would be next to impossible to hide what you won only because you wouldn't be showing that income on those forms. I see you already thought of that. Depends on your relationship anyway. My mother never looked at a tax return in her life AFAIK. I'm sure she would have just signed whatever my Dad put in front of her. However, I doubt if he hid anything from her. BTW, don't think Fundamentalist Christians aren't on LP... LOL! Many very religious people might want to hide playing the lottery from their church, but nobody's perfect! As I said, it's none of my business and I don't judge other people's personal relationships. I just think it's ironic that someone who is secretly doing something doesn't consider that the person he is hiding that secret from is capable of also secretly doing something. I'm not talking about you (really) but let's say a man is cheating on his wife. He'll go out and sneak behind her back and then get furious (and hurt) when he finds out she's been having an affair! "OMG! How can she do that to me?" | | |
Gurnee, Illinois United States Member #50189 February 12, 2007 520 Posts Offline | | Posted: April 17, 2007, 6:32 pm - IP Logged | |
justxploring: Yeah, I know in some camps what I am doing might be considered foul play...doing anything that one must keep a secret from their spouse...but in discussions like this with my wife, we have agreed that their are times when we have to agree to disagree and keep loving each other. However, she was really adamant THAT I NOT PLAY the lottery...kind of like she was commanding me as though I were a child. Of course, you know what usually happens when you tell a child not to do something that they see nothing wrong in doing...they do it anyway behind their parents' backs. Now I definitely do not consider myself a childish person. I believe in taking care of all my responsibilities. But I also see playing the lottery as one of my recreational outlets just like playing golf. I figure that this is one recreational outlet that actually benefits a good cause whether I win or not...and should I happen to win, then in my eyes, that's truly a win-win situation! Get MONEY!!! Winning a JACKPOT lottery is all the HOPE and CHANGE I desire!!! NOW give me MONEY! | | |
United States Member #50584 February 26, 2007 601 Posts Offline | | Posted: April 17, 2007, 7:02 pm - IP Logged | |
When his wife became estranged and started shacking up with another guy he should have divorced her then but that's what happens when a person doesn't take care of those legal things in a timely manner. If he wasn't planning on having a family with any those women then he would have been better off to have just played house and that way he could have just moved on when he won the lottery and kept it all. Yep, all it would have taken was to get divorced before he or she started shacking up with anyone else. Then he wouldn't have felt the need to offer to split the jackpot with his girlfriend in order to keep it away from his estranged wife, and he could have kept the whole thing instead of 25%. I wonder if he still has any of it left? He doesn't seem to be the type to plan for the future or to make good decisions. | | |
Indiana United States Member #49185 January 7, 2007 1770 Posts Offline | | Posted: April 17, 2007, 7:15 pm - IP Logged | |
Wouldn't the spouse only get half if you already claimed it? Lets say you won a big jackpot, but you haven't claimed it yet, and you get a divorce, then you claimed it. I mean, if you haven't claimed it yet, there wouldn't be anything to show a huge income accumulation. Just keep the ticket hidden until the divorce is over? Gonna win. | | |
United States Member #4963 May 30, 2004 3230 Posts Offline | | Posted: April 17, 2007, 7:33 pm - IP Logged | |
It's really none of my business OldSchool. I am certainly no expert when it comes to marriages. I just would never keep a secret like that from my spouse. Anyway, I think your wife may be much smarter than you think. If you are self-employed and use Form 1040 along with Form SE and Schedule C, etc., it would be next to impossible to hide what you won only because you wouldn't be showing that income on those forms. I see you already thought of that. Depends on your relationship anyway. My mother never looked at a tax return in her life AFAIK. I'm sure she would have just signed whatever my Dad put in front of her. However, I doubt if he hid anything from her. BTW, don't think Fundamentalist Christians aren't on LP... LOL! Many very religious people might want to hide playing the lottery from their church, but nobody's perfect! As I said, it's none of my business and I don't judge other people's personal relationships. I just think it's ironic that someone who is secretly doing something doesn't consider that the person he is hiding that secret from is capable of also secretly doing something. I'm not talking about you (really) but let's say a man is cheating on his wife. He'll go out and sneak behind her back and then get furious (and hurt) when he finds out she's been having an affair! "OMG! How can she do that to me?" GULL's not Stupid FESS-up BOUY's>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WHAT are the GULL's>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GOOD FOR?????? | | |
United States Member #50584 February 26, 2007 601 Posts Offline | | Posted: April 17, 2007, 7:39 pm - IP Logged | |
Wouldn't the spouse only get half if you already claimed it? Lets say you won a big jackpot, but you haven't claimed it yet, and you get a divorce, then you claimed it. I mean, if you haven't claimed it yet, there wouldn't be anything to show a huge income accumulation. Just keep the ticket hidden until the divorce is over? Or they could get their butts hauled back to court (and maybe jail?) for attempting to conceal assets. If you live in a state where there's no anonymity, you know the ex is gonna find out. | | |
United States Member #4963 May 30, 2004 3230 Posts Offline | | Posted: April 17, 2007, 8:01 pm - IP Logged | |
Or they could get their butts hauled back to court (and maybe jail?) for attempting to conceal assets. If you live in a state where there's no anonymity, you know the ex is gonna find out. EQUAL for ...................................................................................!!!! Boooooooooooooooouuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuyyyyyyyyyy'ssssss or>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GULL$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ ............................. 
| | |
mid-Ohio United States Member #9 March 24, 2001 13458 Posts Offline | | Posted: April 17, 2007, 8:34 pm - IP Logged | |
Wouldn't the spouse only get half if you already claimed it? Lets say you won a big jackpot, but you haven't claimed it yet, and you get a divorce, then you claimed it. I mean, if you haven't claimed it yet, there wouldn't be anything to show a huge income accumulation. Just keep the ticket hidden until the divorce is over? A California woman tried that a few years ago. She was in an office pool that won the lottery and since her husband wasn't working and she didn't want to support him, she divorced him before he found out about her lottery winnings. She was fine for a year until he found out about it (she was doing too good without him) so he went back to court to redo their divorce settlement and the judge was so mad at her deceit that he ordered her to give it all to her ex-husband. I think she appealed that decision. Once you choose a mate and make it legal, they earn half of what you accumulate during the marriage by just being around. * THat which happens most * * is most likely to happen again * 
| | |
Indiana United States Member #49185 January 7, 2007 1770 Posts Offline | | Posted: April 17, 2007, 8:38 pm - IP Logged | |
Do you think anyone would sue their spouse if their spouse won a jackpot immediately after the divorce? Gonna win. | | |
mid-Ohio United States Member #9 March 24, 2001 13458 Posts Offline | | Posted: April 17, 2007, 8:49 pm - IP Logged | |
Do you think anyone would sue their spouse if their spouse won a jackpot immediately after the divorce? Why not, people who only shared a booty call have sued why not a spouse? * THat which happens most * * is most likely to happen again * 
| | |
United States Member #51491 March 24, 2007 10 Posts Offline
| | Posted: April 17, 2007, 10:37 pm - IP Logged | |
A $10 million lottery windfall brought an estranged Vancouver couple back together. But eight years later, the marriage wound up in divorce court with a sticky issue to be resolved: What should be done with $2.2 million in an account the husband claimed was for his personal use? In granting their divorce last week, B.C. Supreme Court Justice Heather Holmes ruled the $2.2 million must be split between Minh Kien Le, 58, and his ex-wife, Mai Huong Cao, 55. The couple escaped with their two young children by boat from their native Vietnam after the fall of Saigon in 1975. They settled in Terrace and later moved to Vancouver and scraped together enough money to buy a house on Fraser Street. Le was laid off in 1996 and did odd jobs for cash until he became a multimillionaire in the Dec. 23, 1999 Super 7 draw. After his win, Le gifted his three children $1.5 million each. Together, the couple built a new house on West 59th Avenue and put it in Cao's name. Both sides agreed that interest from a joint account containing $2.2 million paid household expenses of about $115,000 a year and should be divided equally. But Le considered $2.2 million in an account in his name alone to be his, although he used some of the money for family purposes. That was enough to satisfy the law on splitting assets. "Challenged about how he could have paid from the joint account all the family expenses set out in his financial statement, [Le] responded that he would withdraw amounts from the second fund and place them in his own checking account as necessary to pay family or other expenses," said the judge, noting that amounted to paying the expenses from the second fund. In Re the above case ...... this case is not subject to US laws ; the above case would be in each state court then after 5 years appealed to federal district court and about $$ 265,000 in legall fees latter , before reaching the US SUPREAM COURT if the court would hear it ....The best deal he could have expected was 50-50 : He could take the money back from the kids legaly but not from his ex-wife ... but whats this old bag gonna do with so much money ...she will most likely get the best outfits money can buy start sleeping with any one who wanted her then those other men - will end up pumping her for the loot she stole from her husband; doggie doggie  | | |
Wandering Aimlessly United States Member #25708 November 5, 2005 4403 Posts Offline | | Posted: April 18, 2007, 4:49 am - IP Logged | |
Do you think anyone would sue their spouse if their spouse won a jackpot immediately after the divorce? I think it depends on the divorce agreement. If you have children and child support is based on income, then it makes sense that the State would increase the child support. That might be automatic in some cases. I don't think a ex-wife or ex-husband is entitled to any money won after the divorce is final unless the winner was behind in his/her obligations. Let's say 2 people agree to payoff their debts. If one falls behind because he used the money to gamble, I'd say the other has a pretty good shot at collecting some of the prize money if negligence could be proven. | | |
United States Member #3331 January 7, 2004 148 Posts Offline | | Posted: April 18, 2007, 4:02 pm - IP Logged | |
If the CA woman had won herself (instead of as part as an office pool), kept it quiet and then divorced her husband (and waited the six months to become final) BEFORE cashing in her lotto ticket - Would that have been a better plan in what she was trying to do/get away with? | | |
mid-Ohio United States Member #9 March 24, 2001 13458 Posts Offline | | Posted: April 18, 2007, 9:00 pm - IP Logged | |
There probably are spouses that have gotten away with cheating their exes out of a fair share of what was accumulated during their time together but only the ones that got caught ever made the news. * THat which happens most * * is most likely to happen again * 
| | |
NY United States Member #24178 October 16, 2005 2127 Posts Offline | | Posted: April 19, 2007, 1:20 am - IP Logged | |
If the CA woman had won herself (instead of as part as an office pool), kept it quiet and then divorced her husband (and waited the six months to become final) BEFORE cashing in her lotto ticket - Would that have been a better plan in what she was trying to do/get away with? Unless you live someplace where your spouse isn't entitled to a share of the assets accumulated during the marriage, one of the routine parts of a divorce is an accounting of all assets in order to determine an equitable division of those assets. A winning lottery ticket is an asset, so it has to be disclosed. As in the case noted above, attempting to conceal assets is a good way to lose them. | | |
|