Welcome Guest
Log In | Register )
You last visited November 21, 2008, 5:40 am

Woman must forfeit $1 million lottery jackpot

Topic locked. Last post more than one year ago by computerhead723. 15 comments.

Page 2 of 2 BackGo to Page
Print E-mail Link
Standard Member
Senior
Coastal Georgia
United States
Member #2703
October 30, 2003
1868 Posts
Offline
Posted: August 16, 2007, 1:26 pm - IP Logged Bottom


I'm disappointed that Mrs. Goodenow had to give up $1 million scratch ticket.

So you condone and / or approve of criminal behavior ?

 

                               

              

 

 

psykomo's avatar - animal shark
Standard Member
Top 100 Poster
Senior

United States
Member #4963
May 30, 2004
2423 Posts
Offline
Posted: August 20, 2007, 1:34 pm - IP Logged Bottom Top

Yeah, Yeah, Yeah! I Agree!

credit card operator's R HONEST

student loan operator's R HONEST

LOAN COLLECTOR's are.........??????

Law maker's & loan legislation.........r really honest (lobbist r honest....tooo)!!!!!!!

U OWE.......U OWE......OFF........U SLAVE's U GO.......(to D pur house)!!

Dee LOTTERY.................will ^^^^^^^^^^^

 

SET US FREE^^^

LOL>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>WE need-IT!!!!!! 

computerhead723's avatar - lightbulb
Standard Member
Regular

United States
Member #54866
August 17, 2007
122 Posts
Offline
Posted: August 25, 2007, 1:59 am - IP Logged Bottom Top

A White City, Oregon, woman must turn over her lottery winnings after a judge said she won them illegally.

Prosecutors said Christina Goodenow, of White City, used a credit card that belonged to her then-boyfriend's dead mother to buy a winning $1 million Scratch-It ticket in Oct. 2005.

Goodenow asked lottery officials to keep her win quiet, claiming to be a victim of domestic violence. But police learned of the crime about two weeks later, as Goodenow continued to use the stolen credit card.

On Thursday, Jackson County Judge Ray White ruled that the winnings were the proceeds of illegal activity and must be forfeited under Oregon law.

Goodenow pleaded no contest to forgery, cheating and aggravated theft.

Besides stripping Goodenow of her winnings, White sentenced Goodenow to a month in jail. But White gave her credit for the six months she served earlier this year for possessing methamphetamine.

Goodenow, who maintains she bought the winning ticket with cash from her own pocket and said she plans to appeal, must spend two years on probation.

This  case  should  go  all  the  way  to  the  Supream Court ;

The  judges  Ruling Over-steped  his  Jurisdiction ;True  the  woman  stole  a  credit  card  that  was  illegal  and  she  should  pay  for  her  decession  but  to  strip  her  of  the  money  was  Impropper  and  beyound  the  scope  of  justice ;

returnig  the  money  to  the  credit  card  and  a  jail  sentence  but  not  a  lottery-ticket  because  it  would  have left  a  trial  of  reciepts  , which  in  this  case  there  was  only  a  ticket  ...which  won  a  million  and  this  individual  was  robed  of  her  winnings;Smash 

csfb's avatar - Lottery 001
Standard Member
Regular

United States
Member #15582
May 13, 2005
307 Posts
Offline
Posted: August 25, 2007, 7:05 am - IP Logged Bottom Top

This  case  should  go  all  the  way  to  the  Supream Court ;

The  judges  Ruling Over-steped  his  Jurisdiction ;True  the  woman  stole  a  credit  card  that  was  illegal  and  she  should  pay  for  her  decession  but  to  strip  her  of  the  money  was  Impropper  and  beyound  the  scope  of  justice ;

returnig  the  money  to  the  credit  card  and  a  jail  sentence  but  not  a  lottery-ticket  because  it  would  have left  a  trial  of  reciepts  , which  in  this  case  there  was  only  a  ticket  ...which  won  a  million  and  this  individual  was  robed  of  her  winnings;Smash 

You have totally massacred the English language! Smash

         Sun Smiley             

Standard Member
Senior
Pennsylvania
United States
Member #17377
June 10, 2005
1068 Posts
Offline
Posted: August 25, 2007, 8:17 am - IP Logged Bottom Top

Computerhead- Please go back and re-read the article in its entirety. You are missing some important legal infractions that played a MAJOR part in this judges ruling.

Let me put it to you in kindergarden terms: Johnny stole money from his sisters' piggy bank. Johnny goes and buys lots of candy with it. Momma comes home and finds that Johnny broke into his sisters piggybank. Momma says Bad Deed Johnny, for that you are grounded and have to give all the candy back .

kindness is a small gesture accepted by another 

 

 

computerhead723's avatar - lightbulb
Standard Member
Regular

United States
Member #54866
August 17, 2007
122 Posts
Offline
Posted: August 26, 2007, 2:20 am - IP Logged Bottom Top

Computerhead- Please go back and re-read the article in its entirety. You are missing some important legal infractions that played a MAJOR part in this judges ruling.

Let me put it to you in kindergarden terms: Johnny stole money from his sisters' piggy bank. Johnny goes and buys lots of candy with it. Momma comes home and finds that Johnny broke into his sisters piggybank. Momma says Bad Deed Johnny, for that you are grounded and have to give all the candy back .

Throw  momma  off  the  train....and  if  were  reading  the  same  story  the  mother  was  dead  and  her  son  had  this  female  friend  who  continued  to  use  the  dead  mothers  credit  card ;

I  stick  to  my  ruling  ....The  judge  in  this  case  ruled  beyond  the  juisdiction  of  his  authority  and unless  the  credit  card  was  used  to  buy  that  \  lottery ticket  he  cannot  rule  the  winnings  illegal

legal  infractions  combined  does  not  give  a  judge  authority  to  make  LAW ;

this  is  not  for  kindergarden .......Girl  with  game !!!!!!!!!!