some people arent just boycotting the pick3,4 and lotto 5 some people are boycotting even the powerball and scratch offs that are not RNG related just so tennessee can see the players arent happy right now.

 "The Tennessee Lottery did not state whether or not they conduct their own series of test draws."

 I thought that after complaints were made the lottery officials said they DID do test draws and that they came up with doubles. People reading this article will be misinformed. Such is media these days...

If you go to Tennessean.com and look for the search feature in the upper right hand corner of the page then click news and type in lottery you will get everything they printed about their lottery problems since starting the RNG software.

First, all the Lottery officials say computer RNG

software is the best invention since Tennessee......."whiskey"

Now the Lottery officials say it is............................"FIXED"

??????????????????????????????

WARNING RNG could be bad for your wallet:

You know what this reminds me of, Superman III. In the movie near the beginning, the Daily Planet had a raffle for a trip to South America. It was called 'Jingo', a simple mechanical ball drawn machine with a number inside the ball. The objective was to match 4 different numbers. During the picking, Mr. White says, 'Could we get a computer to do this?' Later near the end, they did get a computer. It blew-up during the draw; smoke came rolling out... lol... I can just imagine seeing this going on at the Tennessee Lottery Headquarters; smoke everywhere, jaws dropped in disbelief that it actually failed.

I wonder if anyone who discovered this early tried to take advantage of it by not picking sets with duplicates.

No, that's not true.  The lottery did not officially state if they conducted test draws.  You are thinking of the e-mail replies that went out -- which are NOT the same thing as making a statement.

The "media" (which is me in this case, since I wrote it) is being very precise in the wording, and it is a very important point.  The lottery may be in a bind, because either they tested it or they didn't, and no matter which position they take (when they eventually take a position), they will have conflicted earlier statements.

Thus, they are saying nothing on the issue, and hoping that people will not notice.  I have noticed.

Good point, and good for you.  I'm glad that this issue is making people stand up and take notice.  It is upsetting to think that any lottery could get away with this by temporarily offering up a mere 20% prize increase.  Then, it's back to business as usual.  Maybe if enough people hold on to their money they will be force to do something mroe radical.  Perhaps maybe even to listen to the players, who almost universally hate computerized drawings.

  from the article:

  Lemmonds, who said he does not play Cash3 or Cash 4, said he just hopes the problem is fixed as it impacted many players.

  "I can't say I was surprised," he said, adding he hopes a similar problem does not occur again.

____________________________________

  It's a pretty sad commentary when someone who doesn't even play the daily games notices the same anomalies we see in these faux drawings. Unfortunately, we know with relative certainty that this will happen again, whether in Tennessee's lottery or in the next state to jump on the "industry trends" bandwagon.

  There is only ONE reason that state lotteries would switch from mechanical drawings to electronic RNG's: It makes it much easier to control and manipulate their payouts in order to maximize profits. The lotteries have a built-in shield which protects them from close scrutiny; most people simply refuse to believe their state officials could be so blatantly dishonest. They argue, "The lotteries would never do anything like that intentionally, because look at what would happen if they got caught."

  Well, I can only say that they've already been caught many, many times, and we all know what happened in every single instance: Nothing. "Don't be ridiculous," they tell us, "it was a simple programming error, and it wasn't even our fault. There is no conspiracy to limit payouts and you're being paranoid. Besides, given the level of integrity we claim to observe, you can be assured that if this ever happens again, we'll take any steps necessary to see that you don't find out about it." 

  Okay. But what about Minnesota? What about Colorado? What about Delaware? What about Indiana? What about ...  "Yeah, yeah; we've all heard those urban legends and horror stories from other states that use electronic drawing machines, but that doesn't mean they're not reliable. RNG's are fast becoming the industry standard, and we don't want to be left behind. Look at how cool they are!"

  I can't keep other people from playing their state's lottery games. I can only refuse to give them MY money, so I haven't played a single Hoosier Lottery game since June 4, 2003, when sales manager Marina Bookout told me that the Hoosier Lottery tracks player selections as they're being sold. No other lottery in the country does this. Each of us must step up and vote his own conscience; if you don't believe these machines can be manipulated, nothing I say here will convince you otherwise, and so I'll wish you lots of luck. On the other hand, if you've seen the evidence LosingJeff and I have posted here on the forum, if you've read the myriad of news stories Todd has posted, you know what these RNG's and their keepers are capable of (pardon my grammar). They KNOW that if anyone questions their methods, all they have to do is play the paranoia card, and it will all go away in a few days.

  This trend will continue unchallenged unless and until we secure federal legislation which bans their use in any state-sponsored lottery game. This isn't going to happen until the rest of you get fed up enough to put your names on Todd's petition. LotteryPost.com IS the Players' Lobby. We have members from all over the world, and many of you are experts on your chosen games. We CAN make this happen, because there is no greater collection of lottery players anywhere on the globe. Sending emails and making phone calls is fast and easy, but writing a certified letter is much more satisfying, and your message will last longer in the mind of the recipient. When enough letters begin pouring into the lottery's mailbox, they'll be forced to recognize us. Anyone can delete an email or hang up a phone, but how many of us can pitch an unopened certified letter? 

  Anything worth doing is worth some effort, so open a blank document and start typing. It'll cost you two lottery tickets and change to send your letter via Certified Mail but, if you live in Tennessee or Indiana, the tickets you'll sacrifice were probably losers, anyway.

  The time for us to pull together is here. If we unite for this common cause, we can and will achieve our objectives; if we continue on our current, individual paths of isolationism, we'll have only ourselves to blame when more states embrace and adopt this technology.

I have to commend those Lottery Post members and non-members who brought this issue up here and with the Tennessee Lottery. They could have said nothing knowing the problem existed and made a nice tidy profit from Tennessee Lottery's self-induced ignorance. My hat is off to you. You showed the lottery officials and the public what honesty and integrity looks like.

 I apologize for assuming that the H'ville Star News left out the part of the emails stating that the TN Lottery had indeed done tests. At any rate, e-mails these days must have SOME validity or else so many people at the top wouldn't be deleting them left and right. Yes it's very important that the players who threw down their good money on doubles and triples get the whole story. Thank you Todd for doing your part! I'll try to read the whole post before commenting in the future.

There are several ways that I put together news stories.  Sometimes I write them myself.  Sometimes I post directly from another media source.  And sometimes I put together a piece that uses bits from other sources, and the rest I write myself.

The article able is the third type of story.  If you check the Source at the bottom you will see "Huntsville Star News, Lottery Post Staff".  That means I took bits from the Huntsville Star News story, and wrote the rest myself.  So to say that the HSN left out something is not really the case, since the story is really my own doing.  If anyone left something out, it was me.

However, I don't think there was anything left out.  An e-mail sent to people from an unknown source within the lottery is not a verified news source.  Many times such e-mails are written by underlings, without direct input from officials.  That would not make it an "official" statement.  It's more like good info that should be confirmed by an official.  The information posted to their web site can be considered "official".

I am indeed trying to get the whole story.  I think that much is apparent.  I am also trying to do so in a way that exposes as much as possible, while remaining ethical and factual.

I hope this clears things up.  It's not an exact science.

Did anyone catch the toll free number that the Tennessee lottery gave out to call for info ?

It is a sex chat line !!!!     

I saw this on CNN today.

http://search.tennessean.com/sp?aff=100&keywords=lottery

" Is prayer your steering wheel or your spare tire? "

http://www.ohiolottery.com/