You last visited May 17, 2008, 4:44 am
|
Texas students rank USA lotteries
Texas students rank USA lotteriesPosted: 12/20/2007 7:34:23 PM  California, Pennsylvania best; Tennessee worst Gerald Busald is at it again. For more than a decade, the 65-year-old math professor at San Antonio College has turned scrutiny of the Texas Lottery into a classroom project. Armed with calculators, Busald and his students have exposed false advertising, attracted the media spotlight and sparked change. This year, Busald and his students are aiming beyond Texas. On Friday, they unveiled a ranking of every lottery in the United States based on fairness and disclosure, hoping to wield national influence on lottery best practices. The class spent an entire semester deciding how to score the states and how much weight to put on each factor, then gathering and analyzing the data from lottery Web sites. They considered what states do with unclaimed prize money, whether they are upfront about the odds of winning and whether winnings are taxed. "It's about truth in government," Busald said. "Telling players the truth doesn't hurt your sales." The results? Texas ranked third behind California and Pennsylvania, scoring 64 out of 100 points. Tennessee came in last with 24 points. Texas had the best overall Web site but was docked for its high-priced $50 scratch-off ticket and for not giving unclaimed prize money back to players. Texas now has a Spanish-language page on its Web site - which is only fair since the lottery markets to Hispanics - and has taken steps to protect players from store clerks conniving to cash in on customers' winning tickets. California, which scored 71 points, got kudos for promptly closing scratch-off games after top prizes are gone, keeping its scratch-off ticket prices low and not collecting state income tax on prize money. Busald's crusade against the Texas Lottery began in 1997, when his students figured out ads for the Cash 5 game were touting inflated winnings. Their calculations prompted a flurry of news reports, and lottery officials took down the ads. But they wouldn't admit they were wrong until months later. "They totally dissed the students. That really ticked me off," Busald said. Nowadays, Texas Lottery officials no longer ignore Busald's suggestions. Several of his recommendations over the years have been implemented, said Bobby Heith, a lottery spokesman. For example, the lottery now prints the cash value of jackpots on the back of tickets, which is important because winners get less money than advertised if they take the jackpot in a lump sum rather than in payments. "As a state agency, you are always going to have that scrutiny," Heith said. "Sometimes people from the outside can see things we don't see, and we find it very helpful." For students such as Lorraine Gonzales, a 39-year-old nursing major, the class has been a breath of fresh air compared with working theoretical problems in a book. "To do a whole project and work it all the way through, that is definitely going to stick with me," Gonzales said. If that work actually prods other states to adopt better lottery practices, that would be awesome, she said. "I told my students, if you can make a change in society, you have done something," Busald said. "Not many students get an opportunity to do that." Source: Express-News
United States Member #4963 May 30, 2004 1904 Posts Offline
|
| Posted: December 20, 2007, 8:12 pm - IP Logged |
Top
|
California, Pennsylvania best; Tennessee worst Gerald Busald is at it again. For more than a decade, the 65-year-old math professor at San Antonio College has turned scrutiny of the Texas Lottery into a classroom project. Armed with calculators, Busald and his students have exposed false advertising, attracted the media spotlight and sparked change. This year, Busald and his students are aiming beyond Texas. On Friday, they unveiled a ranking of every lottery in the United States based on fairness and disclosure, hoping to wield national influence on lottery best practices. The class spent an entire semester deciding how to score the states and how much weight to put on each factor, then gathering and analyzing the data from lottery Web sites. They considered what states do with unclaimed prize money, whether they are upfront about the odds of winning and whether winnings are taxed. "It's about truth in government," Busald said. "Telling players the truth doesn't hurt your sales." The results? Texas ranked third behind California and Pennsylvania, scoring 64 out of 100 points. Tennessee came in last with 24 points. Texas had the best overall Web site but was docked for its high-priced $50 scratch-off ticket and for not giving unclaimed prize money back to players. Texas now has a Spanish-language page on its Web site - which is only fair since the lottery markets to Hispanics - and has taken steps to protect players from store clerks conniving to cash in on customers' winning tickets. California, which scored 71 points, got kudos for promptly closing scratch-off games after top prizes are gone, keeping its scratch-off ticket prices low and not collecting state income tax on prize money. Busald's crusade against the Texas Lottery began in 1997, when his students figured out ads for the Cash 5 game were touting inflated winnings. Their calculations prompted a flurry of news reports, and lottery officials took down the ads. But they wouldn't admit they were wrong until months later. "They totally dissed the students. That really ticked me off," Busald said. Nowadays, Texas Lottery officials no longer ignore Busald's suggestions. Several of his recommendations over the years have been implemented, said Bobby Heith, a lottery spokesman. For example, the lottery now prints the cash value of jackpots on the back of tickets, which is important because winners get less money than advertised if they take the jackpot in a lump sum rather than in payments. "As a state agency, you are always going to have that scrutiny," Heith said. "Sometimes people from the outside can see things we don't see, and we find it very helpful." For students such as Lorraine Gonzales, a 39-year-old nursing major, the class has been a breath of fresh air compared with working theoretical problems in a book. "To do a whole project and work it all the way through, that is definitely going to stick with me," Gonzales said. If that work actually prods other states to adopt better lottery practices, that would be awesome, she said. "I told my students, if you can make a change in society, you have done something," Busald said. "Not many students get an opportunity to do that." SORRY>>>>>>>>>>Lorraine Gonzales<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<: Psykomo does not know you...............but, ................................ I did go to college with a Jimmy Gonzales, ................................. & he did have a HOT>>>>>>>>>>>>>>, ............PONTIAC>>>> insured by GEICO....??????????????????????????????????????? DO you know JIMMY??????????????????????????????????????? he was from Bogota........PSYKOMO will never forget..........JIMMY EVERY XMAS when he went HOME.......he brought us "coffee" beans from HIS>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>GREAT COUNTRY!!! Thanksssssssssssss>>>>>>>>PROFF Gerald Busald !!! KEEP_UP the G@@D W@RK'$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ keep counting them BEAN"$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ LOL PSYKOMO
|
|
|
Stroudsburg, PA United States Member #1860 July 11, 2003 2506 Posts Offline
|
| Posted: December 20, 2007, 9:05 pm - IP Logged |
Top
|
Here is the website with exact rankings. I like how they deduct points for computerized drawings and for full disclosure of operations. But one thing that I really don't like is the fact they consider a minimum age higher than 18 to be good thing. You can give all the semantics about responsiblity, but when you expect someone to be responsible enough to get their head blown off for lower gas prices, then go back and say those same people are too stupid and idiotic enough to by a mere lottery ticket, that is a cruel double standard. I also don't like that this class gives no points for high prize payouts. That is perhaps the best thing a lottery can do, other than transparency and fairness. You only need one ticket to win. But you'll win more with one hundred.
|
|
|
Illinois United States Member #30849 January 17, 2006 3096 Posts Offline
|
| Posted: December 21, 2007, 12:02 am - IP Logged |
Top
|
JimmySand9 "I also don't like that this class gives no points for high prize payouts. That is perhaps the best thing a lottery can do, other than transparency and fairness." Since they're rating individual state lotteries it wouldn't be fair to give points for high prize payouts- how could Rhode Island or Missouri compare with Florida or New York? States with smaller populations just can't compete in that kind of category. It's Lotto, not horseshoes or artillery! close doesn't count! I sell everything at a loss but make up for it in volume - Milo Minderbinder, Catch-22
|
|
|
Tennessee United States Member #8005 October 15, 2004 11138 Posts Offline
|
| Posted: December 21, 2007, 12:29 am - IP Logged |
Top
|
i agree with tennessee being the worst BUT how in the hell can georgia and virginia be at the bottom of the list as one of the worst lotteries also.this list just isn't valid for those reasons.arizona near the top? and california number one? nah....
|
|
|
You Can Take it to the Bank Charlotte NC United States Member #17704 June 18, 2005 3142 Posts Offline
|
| Posted: December 21, 2007, 12:58 am - IP Logged |
Top
|
This was such a refreshing article. These students have done a great job. What better subject for a Statistics Class than the lottery.
They raised some points that I hadn't thought about like "free ticket" being calulating in as prizes. It should be a law for all states to remove scratch offs when the major prizes are gone. This is interesting about TN. Just an observation – CEO compensation as much as 6 times the national average They are doing their jobs.LOL
|
|
|
Stroudsburg, PA United States Member #1860 July 11, 2003 2506 Posts Offline
|
| Posted: December 21, 2007, 1:07 am - IP Logged |
Top
|
JimmySand9 "I also don't like that this class gives no points for high prize payouts. That is perhaps the best thing a lottery can do, other than transparency and fairness." Since they're rating individual state lotteries it wouldn't be fair to give points for high prize payouts- how could Rhode Island or Missouri compare with Florida or New York? States with smaller populations just can't compete in that kind of category. I probably should have clarified that I meant payout percentages. Namely, the percentage of sales that goes back towards prizes. You only need one ticket to win. But you'll win more with one hundred.
|
|
|
United States Member #56982 November 21, 2007 865 Posts Offline
|
| Posted: December 21, 2007, 2:20 am - IP Logged |
Top
|
This was such a refreshing article. These students have done a great job. What better subject for a Statistics Class than the lottery.
They raised some points that I hadn't thought about like "free ticket" being calulating in as prizes. It should be a law for all states to remove scratch offs when the major prizes are gone. This is interesting about TN. Just an observation – CEO compensation as much as 6 times the national average They are doing their jobs.LOL I agree. It was an interesting article.  Veni, Vidi, Bibi: "I came, I saw, I drank."
|
|
|
Sunny Florida United States Member #25708 November 5, 2005 3634 Posts Offline
|
| Posted: December 21, 2007, 4:08 am - IP Logged |
Top
|
This was such a refreshing article. These students have done a great job. What better subject for a Statistics Class than the lottery.
They raised some points that I hadn't thought about like "free ticket" being calulating in as prizes. It should be a law for all states to remove scratch offs when the major prizes are gone. This is interesting about TN. Just an observation – CEO compensation as much as 6 times the national average They are doing their jobs.LOL I liked it too.
California, which scored 71 points, got kudos for promptly closing scratch-off games after top prizes are gone, keeping its scratch-off ticket prices low and not collecting state income tax on prize money. Okay - now I need to check Florida! Only 30 points? What is wrong with a Free Ticket? I get a free ticket if I get 2/5 in Fantasy 5. I guess some people would rather get $1 and choose their own numbers, but is it bad because you get a QP? Many of these Free Tickets have won jackpots.
|
|
|
WorldWide United States Member #55685 September 18, 2007 65 Posts Offline
|
| Posted: December 21, 2007, 4:08 am - IP Logged |
Top
|
Alright the professor and his students are still up to it! i remember this story a while back how they busted the lottery in texas or something. Good for them we need more people like these students they need to contact me I have some very interesting things to show them I bet they have never seen before.
|
|
|
|