Welcome Guest
Log In | Register )
You last visited January 9, 2009, 4:13 am

Judge rules thief keeps lottery jackpot

Judge rules thief keeps lottery jackpot

Posted: 1/18/2008 7:24:50 PM

Massachusetts Lottery

The Massachusetts bank robber accused of violating his probation by scratching and winning a $1 million lottery ticket will keep his windfall and will not face jail time as a result of a court hearing this morning in Barnstable.

Appearing in Barnstable Superior Court, Timothy Elliott, 55, was found in violation of his probation for buying the "$800 Million Spectacular" scratch ticket at the Hyannis Stop & Shop on Independence Drive on Nov. 23.

He was today ordered to pay $65 a month to monitor his compliance with terms of his probation, which is also retroactive to when he won the lottery money late last year. There are also terms and compliance conditions in place for Elliott from the state Department of Mental Health.

Elliott robbed two Hyannis banks in the past seven years. He was originally put on probation after pleading guilty in 2001 to armed robbery and larceny. He violated that probation by failing to take prescribed medication and attend substance abuse counseling, among other problems, and was ordered into the care of Taunton State Hospital, a psychiatric institution.

He violated probation again by committing another unarmed robbery in January 2006 and received a revised five-year probation. He now stands accused of violating probation again by buying his winning lottery ticket, according to court records.

Stories about Elliott's lottery winnings and his criminal background appeared in publications around the country. Questions were raised whether Elliott would be allowed to keep his lottery winnings.

"Truth be told, this was more of a media circus," said Elliott's attorney Drew Segadelli this morning, adding that Elliott is now living in Pocasset. The implication in those stories that Elliott would not collect his winnings was absurd, Segadelli said.

Still pending against Elliott is a contempt of court filing in a Nantucket child support case. Elliott owes $37,900 in unpaid alimony and child support from a 1979 divorce judgment, according to court documents.

In a document filed Dec. 5 in Nantucket Probate and Family Court, Elliott's former wife claims he never paid the court ordered support payments of $75 per week.

Source: Cape Cod Times

ThatScaryChick's avatar - myselfsimis1
Platinum Member
Advanced
Idaho
United States
Member #56982
November 21, 2007
1869 Posts
Offline
Posted: January 18, 2008, 7:54 pm - IP Logged Bottom Top

The whole thing is crazy. I guess he was lucky that the judge decided to let him keep his winnings. Although I am surprised TPTB never took out his child support and alimony at the very beginning. I thought they usually check for those things before handing over a check. 

Platinum Member
Top 100 Poster
Senior
Charlotte NC
United States
Member #17704
June 18, 2005
3292 Posts
Offline
Posted: January 18, 2008, 8:14 pm - IP Logged Bottom Top

Hurray!I'm glad he get to keep his money.

Jack Pot's avatar - Lottery 028
Standard Member
Regular

United States
Member #55716
September 20, 2007
155 Posts
Offline
Posted: January 18, 2008, 9:05 pm - IP Logged Bottom Top

I hope he is going to use this windfall to turn his life around.

psykomo's avatar - animal shark
Standard Member
Top 100 Poster
Senior

United States
Member #4963
May 30, 2004
2497 Posts
Offline
Posted: January 18, 2008, 9:19 pm - IP Logged Bottom Top

The whole thing is crazy. I guess he was lucky that the judge decided to let him keep his winnings. Although I am surprised TPTB never took out his child support and alimony at the very beginning. I thought they usually check for those things before handing over a check. 

The whole thing is crazy>>>>>>>>>>>>>

I Agree!>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

LOL

PSYKOMO 

sirbrad's avatar - Lottery 062
Standard Member
Advanced
PA
United States
Member #23322
October 6, 2005
1786 Posts
Offline
Posted: January 18, 2008, 11:07 pm - IP Logged Bottom Top

He robs stores yet decides to "buy" a ticket? Pieces of crap like this who are too lazy to work are the ones who do usually win. Instead they rob those who actually have to work for a living. The winnings should be revoked, no question.

Standard Member
Senior
Pennsylvania
United States
Member #17377
June 10, 2005
1070 Posts
Offline
Posted: January 19, 2008, 6:14 pm - IP Logged Bottom Top

I disagree with sirbrads response.

I can count on both hands folks that cheat the govt on a regular basis, yet we each root them on because they have a job? Please.

The courts ruled and so be it.

kindness is a small gesture accepted by another 

 

 

sirbrad's avatar - Lottery 062
Standard Member
Advanced
PA
United States
Member #23322
October 6, 2005
1786 Posts
Offline
Posted: January 19, 2008, 9:15 pm - IP Logged Bottom Top

Courts can also be just as corrupt as the Government. I don't believe any alleged dictatorship is free from corruption on all levels. However to me there is a big difference between cheating the Government, and threatening other's lives by robbing others at gun point. Maybe not to you though. I don't conform to anything that I know is wrong and against my belief system...I don't care who rules it or who it is. The Government cheats, ignores, and neglects far more people that actually need help, then it helps. I have seen countless cases. So a thief should not complain when he also gets stolen from....

The fact is he violated parole, and we should not be sending the message that violating parole can make you rich. Courts can be wrong, and ARE wrong A LOT. They are by no means the last word.

justxploring's avatar - villiarna
Standard Member
Top 50 Poster
Veteran
Sunny SW Florida
United States
Member #25708
November 5, 2005
4196 Posts
Offline
Posted: January 20, 2008, 4:20 am - IP Logged Bottom Top

GameGrl.  Armed robbery is a pretty serious crime.  I assume this means he carried a weapon and could have hurt or killed another person.   

The first article indicated that buying a lottery ticket was in violation of his probation.  If it was not, then he should get the money.  However, if he violated his parole, I agree with Sirbrad. 

But as you said, the courts made a decision, so that's the way it is!   

Standard Member
Senior

United States
Member #13375
March 30, 2005
1112 Posts
Offline
Posted: January 20, 2008, 6:14 am - IP Logged Bottom Top

Sensible judge. He'll get run out of office, if it's possible.

Prince of Insufficient Light ~ Ruler of Heck
"The Earth moves around the Sun." -- some 'crazy' guy, 1632