| Posted: January 20, 2008, 6:41 pm - IP Logged |
|
"He was originally put on probation after pleading guilty in 2001 to armed robbery and larceny." I love the message here that no one has to take responsibilty for their criminal actions, and people will just make excuses for you. I guess a lot more poeple should go rob banks, seems like a lot of good fortune follows. I guess money does attract more money.
And the article goes on to say "He violated probation again by committing another unarmed robbery in January 2006 and received a revised five-year probation."
I don't know the Massachusetts criminal code so I don't know why the judge gave Elliott probation if he pleaded guilty to armed robbery and larceny the first time. But logic and common sense would certainly dictate that the judge throw the book at him for robbing another bank while on probation. Since he was only given additional 5 year probation, I'm assuming another unarmed means the first bank robbery was unarmed too.
When Elliott violated his probation the first time for not taking his medication he was ordered into the care of Taunton State Hospital, a psychiatric institution. The court decided his responsibility and keeping the lottery winnings was never an issue.
"Truth be told, this was more of a media circus," said Elliott's attorney Drew Segadelli this morning" and I'm agreeing with him and not making excuses for Elliott.