Welcome Guest
Log In | Register )
You last visited December 1, 2008, 12:17 pm

Judge tosses wife's Lotto suit -- for now

Judge tosses wife's Lotto suit -- for now

Posted: 5/17/2008 6:46:48 PM

Florida Lottery

A Miami-Dade judge on Thursday said the wife of a lottery winner cannot go forward with a lawsuit against her spouse until she proves the money should belong to her.

"She has no identifiable legal rights at this time," Circuit Judge Jennifer D. Bailey said. "Where does the law say you automatically have a right to participate in the proceeds?"

Bailey temporarily dismissed the lawsuit Donna Campbell filed against her husband, Arnim Ramdass, an American Airlines mechanic who hit a $19 million Florida Lotto jackpot last summer with 16 of his co-workers.

Campbell and her attorneys have 20 days to amend their complaint. They must show why Campbell should have a claim to her husband's lottery winnings. They will try to prove that the money Ramdass used to buy the lottery ticket came from his work salary, which is considered a marital asset.

"It appears that once we do that, we can go forward and get a trial date and proceed with vindicating Ms. Campbell's rights," attorney Bruce Baldwin said after Thursday's hearing.

Campbell, 48, a former model and beauty queen, says her husband of three years tried to keep his good fortune a secret from her when he hit the lottery last summer. She claims he disconnected the phone line and kept her from watching TV so she wouldn't find out he was a winner.

Ramdass, 52, and the other winners took a lump-sum payment of $10.2 million, which worked out to $600,000 per player before taxes.

When Campbell found out about the money — she Googled her husband's name and found a Florida Lottery press release about the jackpot — she confronted Ramdass. He told her he bought the winning ticket for his daughter from a previous marriage who lives in Orlando, but Campbell believes that was a ploy to defraud her of the money.

"The facts of this case are not complicated," Bailey said in court, speaking to Campbell's attorneys. "Those folks out at the airport pooled money to buy lottery tickets. One hit — bless 'em — and your allegation is that Mr. Ramdass, in an effort to ice out Ms. Campbell, transferred his ticket to his daughter."

The judge suggested that divorce court might be a better venue to resolve the dispute.

"I'm not sure she has the ability in this court — civil court — to stop her husband from disposing of the lottery money," Bailey said.

But Campbell has maintained that she wants to sue her husband for fraud first and divorce him afterward. She said she feels abandoned by someone who promised to be with her through good times and bad.

Ramdass, who for months eluded process servers and has not responded to interview requests, did not attend the hearing.

"I'm not surprised," Campbell said.

Arnim Ramdass and Donna Campbell eat wedding cake while they celebrate their marriage in 2005.
Arnim Ramdass and Donna Campbell eat wedding cake while they celebrate their marriage in 2005.

Source: Miami Herald

Standard Member
Experienced
MI
United States
Member #55299
August 31, 2007
580 Posts
Offline
Posted: May 17, 2008, 7:29 pm - IP Logged Bottom Top

That wedding photo is creepy, yet hilarious at the same time...

 

Should have had a prenup...

With odds like 1 in 175,711,536 how can I lose?!

You can't predict random.

psykomo's avatar - animal shark
Standard Member
Top 100 Poster
Senior

United States
Member #4963
May 30, 2004
2433 Posts
Offline
Posted: May 17, 2008, 7:33 pm - IP Logged Bottom Top

???? where is the LUV?

Why? do people think $$

all the DARN>>>>>>>>>>>>>TIME $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$?????????

LOL

PSYKOMO   

JackpotWanna's avatar - squiz
Standard Member
Experienced

United States
Member #4194
March 23, 2004
648 Posts
Offline
Posted: May 17, 2008, 10:35 pm - IP Logged Bottom Top

wow! I can't believe it!

Standard Member
Senior
Pennsylvania
United States
Member #17377
June 10, 2005
1068 Posts
Offline
Posted: May 17, 2008, 11:07 pm - IP Logged Bottom Top

For better or worse, she is about to get the worse case of reality check . Interesting to see how her lawyers will dazzle the system in favor of her allegations.

kindness is a small gesture accepted by another 

 

 

ThatScaryChick's avatar - myselfsimis1
Platinum Member
Advanced
Idaho
United States
Member #56982
November 21, 2007
1705 Posts
Online
Posted: May 18, 2008, 1:21 am - IP Logged Bottom Top

I wonder if she will be able to prove that she should have a share of the money. It should be interesting to see what happens.

liberal47's avatar - Rowlf
Standard Member
Regular
Holt MI
United States
Member #2283
September 4, 2003
52 Posts
Offline
Posted: May 18, 2008, 9:48 am - IP Logged Bottom Top

LOL! That picture should be titled Little Richard mates with Amorosa, a merger made in ............

Sandra Dee's avatar - dandy
Standard Member
Regular
Bayonne
United States
Member #61629
May 13, 2008
129 Posts
Offline
Posted: May 18, 2008, 10:56 am - IP Logged Bottom Top

1) I don't know of couples feeding each other the wedding cake with the KNIFE!! 

2) why didn't he claim his part anonymously?

3) I note that he is stingy [insert DUH here] but dayummm! he could have merely said he won a couple of thousands dollars and bought her something nice along with dinner, she would have been good ..

4) He should pay her half for his stupidity! what kind of man disconnects the phone [girls + phone = lifeline] and turned off the t.v.!? what about all those Bravo shows she missed? screw you Arnim RamdASS

5) I hope she files for divorce, leaves him everything and goes on to win a million dollar lotto!

Thinking of...

mjwinsmith's avatar - moon
Platinum Member
Top 100 Poster
Guru

United States
Member #392
June 8, 2002
3037 Posts
Online
Posted: May 18, 2008, 12:30 pm - IP Logged Bottom Top

LOL! That picture should be titled Little Richard mates with Amorosa, a merger made in ............

Good one, LOL

justxploring's avatar - villiarna
Standard Member
Top 50 Poster
Veteran
Sunny SW Florida
United States
Member #25708
November 5, 2005
4080 Posts
Offline
Posted: May 18, 2008, 12:37 pm - IP Logged Bottom Top

Sanda Dee writes:  "Why didn't he claim his part anonymously?

 

Actually, he did everything possible in the State of Florida from what I can see.  It's never been clear if he had already filed for divorce before he won, so I am surprised by the judge's ruling. IMO the lawsuit could possibly end up costing nearly as much as the prize.  So I agree that he should have paid her off, but apparently there is a lot of animosity between them.  I'm not sure what the lawyers will get paid, but 1/3 of the amount is customary if they took the case on contingency.