4 charged in killing of $250,000 lottery winner in Ohio

May 20, 2008, 11:08 pm (37 comments)

Insider Buzz

Burglars returned again and again to the home of a $250,000 Ohio Lottery winner who had two Jaguars, a Rolex watch and lots of cash. The final intrusion, apparently by different criminals, left the 78-year-old retired stockbroker dead of a gunshot wound.

Police aren't saying if Lee Kost's death last Thursday was related to the Mega Millions prize that he won on Sept. 28. But it was clear burglars focused on his home, hitting the house sometime early in the year, again about March 11 and on April 27.

Each time cash was taken, at least $2,800 in all, plus a Rolex, four diamond rings, a sapphire ring, a credit card and a large soft-drink bottle filled with about $500 in change. The first two times, entry was gained through an unlocked door and the third time someone apparently reached through the mail slot and unlocked the door.

Police haven't disclosed what was taken in last week's attack, but said the victim previously met at least one of his attackers. Four people have been charged with aggravated murder and aggravated robbery and $2 million bond was set for each at court appearances on Monday.

The defendants, Terrence J. Maya, 26, of New Orleans, and Antonio C. Taylor, Porche J. Sweet and Megan C. Harper, all 18-year-olds who shared a Canton apartment, got court-appointed attorneys.

Sweet's attorney, Jeffrey Jakmides, said he looked into evidence against his client on Tuesday and said police weren't disclosing much. She will fight the charges, he said.

Kost, who lived alone with two Siamese cats, was found dead in his home Friday after police 35 miles away in Brecksville stopped the four defendants traveling along Interstate 77 in one of his two Jaguars. The car was speeding and moving erratically, police said.

Canton Prosecutor Frank Forchione said the victim had dinner with Sweet on the evening that he was killed and she contacted the others by text message while at the Kost home. Forchione declined Tuesday to specify how Kost and Sweet knew each other.

With two Jaguars and active in the community, the victim's wealth may have attracted unwanted attention, Forchione said. He said the suspects in Kost's death apparently were a different group than the earlier burglars.

Jakmides said he was unaware of any meeting between Kost and his client, if they knew each other or if she might have a financial motive.

The judge who appointed the attorneys to represent the four said there was a potential conflict of interest among them. Jakmides said he understood that meant the defendants might have provided police with information implicating co-defendants.

The defendants are due in court for a preliminary hearing Tuesday. Anthony Koukoutas, an attorney representing Maya, said he couldn't comment except to say his client appeared shocked over the matter.

Messages seeking comment were left for the other defense attorneys.

Sweet was involved in Cleveland on juvenile court charges that she was unruly in 2006 but the case was dismissed, according to court spokeswoman Patricia Oakar. An unruly charge typically involves behavior, like truancy, that isn't a crime for adults.

Sweet, who was placed in a foster home in 2006, was released last year after she turned 18, according to Oakar.

AP

Tags for this story

Other popular tags

Comments

benmas's avatarbenmas

OF course i feel bad about what happened to him, but it is clear that he was not taking certain common sense precautions....

"But it was clear burglars focused on his home, hitting the house sometime early in the year, again about March 11 and on April 27.

Each time cash was taken, at least $2,800 in all, plus a Rolex, four diamond rings, a sapphire ring, a credit card and a large soft-drink bottle filled with about $500 in change. The first two times, entry was gained through an unlocked door and the third time someone apparently reached through the mail slot and unlocked the door."

So his house was hit not once but twice previously, unlocked door, living alone with two siameses cats...two jaguars...

He should have been more cautious when he knew he had money.especially after his house was robbed twice before... he should have locked all the doors, keep a gun and a dog "a german shepherd"  not siamese cats

NightTrain1234's avatarNightTrain1234

A 78 year old man having dinner with a unrelated 18 year old girl.   He probably thought he was going to get lucky.

ThatScaryChick's avatarThatScaryChick

No Nod People can be so horrible sometimes.

jeffrey's avatarjeffrey

I'll donate the firewood and light the match if they want to burn the trash.

DC81's avatarDC81

Geez, he didn't even win a big one either. He had to have had money beforehand.... I wonder if something like this and story of that couple that won a jackpot a few years ago and ended up broke and dead, will influence whomever won the last Mega Millions jackpot.

 

This guy must have been lonely to leave his door unlocked for anyone to just be able to walk in, maybe a bit dense. Not to mention meeting this girl for whatever reason.

time*treat's avatartime*treat

"retired stockbroker"

Sandra Dee's avatarSandra Dee

reason #54,789 why to remain anonymous and to leave these young hussies alone! Thud

Uff Da!'s avatarUff Da!

DC81 said, "This guy must have been lonely to leave his door unlocked for anyone to just be able to walk in, maybe a bit dense."

Leaving his door unlocked may not have been a deliberate choice.  The man was 78 years old.  As we get older, many of us become forgetful, though still "have it together" enough to live alone.  I'm no where near his age, but bet I end up leaving the door unlocked overnight at least half a dozen to a dozen times a year.  Thankfully, I live in a very low-crime area - and have a very protective German Shepherd.  I don't know how I'd protect myself from my own memory problems if I won the big one, but I wouldn't think a $250,000 win would attract much attention if one didn't have flashy things.

MeFirstYouLast

Quote: Originally posted by Sandra Dee on May 21, 2008

reason #54,789 why to remain anonymous and to leave these young hussies alone! Thud

Animinity is not the answer.  Having wealth is not a reason to craw under a rock and hide from the sun.  If thats your goal, buy a candy bar and walk the streets.

Having wealth and advertising it, not having a security system, common sense, and the maturity to live a normal life are flashing signs for disaster.  Of course, living in an environment that attracts criminals is not a superior choice either. Yelling out that you have money, and live alone, is not a way to obtain longivity. The statement "With two Jaguars and active in the community, the victim's wealth may have attracted unwanted attention," indicates everything I need to know. The guys ego ruled everything he did. That had a price. He payed the price.

MeFirstYouLast

Quote: Originally posted by Uff Da! on May 21, 2008

DC81 said, "This guy must have been lonely to leave his door unlocked for anyone to just be able to walk in, maybe a bit dense."

Leaving his door unlocked may not have been a deliberate choice.  The man was 78 years old.  As we get older, many of us become forgetful, though still "have it together" enough to live alone.  I'm no where near his age, but bet I end up leaving the door unlocked overnight at least half a dozen to a dozen times a year.  Thankfully, I live in a very low-crime area - and have a very protective German Shepherd.  I don't know how I'd protect myself from my own memory problems if I won the big one, but I wouldn't think a $250,000 win would attract much attention if one didn't have flashy things.

As shown on the TV show, "It Takes A Thief", a cheap hunk of meat eliminates the threat of any dog.  Criminals have known about that for years.  Even trained attack dogs go after the low grade hamburger. Even a doggie treat is suffiient. A friendly house dog is a great campanion, but is useless protection.. An attack dog is a suicide waiting to happen.

Uff Da!'s avatarUff Da!

Quote: Originally posted by MeFirstYouLast on May 21, 2008

As shown on the TV show, "It Takes A Thief", a cheap hunk of meat eliminates the threat of any dog.  Criminals have known about that for years.  Even trained attack dogs go after the low grade hamburger. Even a doggie treat is suffiient. A friendly house dog is a great campanion, but is useless protection.. An attack dog is a suicide waiting to happen.

Ah, but when the dog (in the garage) starts barking to alert one as soon as he hears someone or something within 100 feet of the house, it gives one time to get up and investigate.  A barking dog and lights going on in the house would discourage most would-be burglars if they don't want a confrontation.  It may not discourage the lower percent who are intent on robbery, but IMO it certainly decreases the total risk.

iwillwin

Quote: Originally posted by Sandra Dee on May 21, 2008

reason #54,789 why to remain anonymous and to leave these young hussies alone! Thud

I think you said it correctly about the hussies.

What the hell is a 78 year old man doing having dinner with an 18 year old?  I'm not the smartest guy in the room, but I have a good idea why.  Now all that other stuff about the unlocked door doesn't matter.  She keeps him occupied until her "friends" are in the house, and then it's over.

I would venture an educated guess that the lottery prize just made an already visible and wealthy man that much more visible.  And therefore a bigger target.

Stack47

Quote: Originally posted by Sandra Dee on May 21, 2008

reason #54,789 why to remain anonymous and to leave these young hussies alone! Thud

Having an option to remain anonymous when winning $250,000 doesn't help much when he probably told his 18 year-old dinner date who happened to be a thief. We can say he should have known better because he had been burglarized before, but apparently he didn't. 

It's a sad story but when a 78 year-old man who lives alone, wears a Rolex, drives a Jag, and dates 18 year-old, painted a target on his back.

Coin Toss's avatarCoin Toss

It sounds like this poor dumb schmuck either blew it all at once or just used the $250,000 to go deeper into debt - two Jags, etc...

If ever there was an argument for keping a low profile and not flaunting it, this guy is it!

Subscribe to this news story
Guest