Welcome Guest
Log In | Register )
You last visited December 1, 2008, 12:17 pm

Wisconsin couple win in lottery -- again!

Wisconsin couple win in lottery -- again!

Posted: 8/22/2008 8:49:14 PM

Wisconsin Lottery

The Mount Horeb couple who made headlines earlier this week because they held two of only four winning tickets sold in Wisconsin for Saturday's SuperCash drawing, turn out to have the other two as well.

Verlyn Adamson, 69, and his wife, Judith, 69, of Mount Horeb, turned in the other two tickets and it turned out they are the only winners in Saturday's drawing and are now $1.4 million richer.

Lottery spokesman Andrew Bohage was surprised when the Adamsons held the first two winning tickets. "I don't recall a time when we've had members of the same household win in the same drawing like that," he said, when they turned in the two tickets.

His shocked doubled today.

"We haven't seen anything quite like this before," he said after learning the Adamsons had the other two winning tickets. "This is unique."

The Adamsons presented two tickets to lottery officials which had Saturday's winning numbers and each of those tickets paid out $350,000. Then they brought in the other two winners, which now raise the total they have won to $1.4 million.

The four tickets were purchased at four different stores in four different communities, lottery officials said. They bought one ticket each at the Stop-N-Go on Highway 18-151 in Barneveld, the Darlington Mini Mart at highways 23 and 81, The Pit Stop in Mineral Point, and the Cenex Mini Mart in Mount Horeb.

Each of those four tickets had the winning numbers in Saturday's SuperCash drawing, which were 1, 5, 8, 13, 24 and 26.

Bohage said Verlyn Adamson chose the numbers based on a "formula" he had worked out.

The Adamsons said they did not want to have a news conference and told lottery officials they would issue a statement through their lawyer.

But after presenting the first two tickets, Judith Adamson said, "I'm in a state of shock." She also said they had been playing the same numbers for several years.

After taxes, the Adamsons will pocket $995,000.

Thanks to mulamula for the tip.

Source: Capital Times

Standard Member
Advanced

United States
Member #10921
January 23, 2005
765 Posts
Offline
Posted: August 22, 2008, 8:57 pm - IP Logged Bottom Top

Oh Joy! We finally have the CORRECT numbers!

Now to get crackin' on figuring out HOW they arrived at them.

If I am successful in doing that then I will freely share it.

It would be a riot if one of my own algorithms given their data gave the same result!

And again, if we guess that 10percent? of players use systems, then when there is a winner (all else equal) there is a 10% chance they used a system. If there were a disproportionate amount of winners that used systems or if a thorough honest backtest of their secret system shows that it made profit even before this drawing, then let me know how much the shareware fee is and if it can do it in nj.

BY the way, it DID happen before, and even more so. A man in Seattle played the same Mega for 10 tickets with different bonus balls but same white balls. He had the first 5 but none of the bonus balls and won I think 1.75M at the time, and said HE used a system.

In January I used a system in PA, and played the same P3 several times for a win.

And I wonder now will WI re-evaluate their draw procedure and do whatever they can to prevent this from happening again???

Standard Member
Experienced
NASHVILLE, TENN
United States
Member #33768
February 20, 2006
392 Posts
Online
Posted: August 22, 2008, 9:04 pm - IP Logged Bottom Top

Who says there is no system!!!!  This couple has one.  So predicting the lotto is possible after all!

More power to them!!!!

Standard Member
Advanced

United States
Member #10921
January 23, 2005
765 Posts
Offline
Posted: August 22, 2008, 9:17 pm - IP Logged Bottom Top

There are more systems out there than teenagers at a Jonas Brothers concert. But I have never seen a backtest of any showing consistent profit, which would be a key selling point more so than one major jackpot win and several small wins that may or may not have netted profit before then. I do hope that their system is valid and profitable and can be used on other games including here. I would even be interested in buying it if it could help with Jersey 5 or MM or PB etc. But I would have to see the backtest results first. In fact being a programmer if they want they can contact me to write a program for them to automate their system, wink-wink, nod-nod!

The one big hurdle with any system is it has to overcome the poor return with otherwise random play. 50 cents on the dollar usually. Sometimes less because of taxes. But if a system has a chance to give me just one multimillion life-changing win then it's worth it even if it's otherwise in the red. I'd rather win 5/5 or 6/6 once than several 3/5, 4/6 etc. It depends on the particular system.

The math professor is correct only in an ideal world. A while back in TN a good system was to not play any doubles ever. Also I predict that tonights Mega bonus ball will be on a YELLOW colored ball, in fact I guarantee it, so only play the YELLOW bonus balls on Mega!!!

Uff Da!'s avatar - InCelebration 001
Standard Member
Experienced
Washington State
United States
Member #34373
February 26, 2006
263 Posts
Offline
Posted: August 22, 2008, 11:06 pm - IP Logged Bottom Top

"But after presenting the first two tickets, Judith Adamson said, "I'm in a state of shock." She also said they had been playing the same numbers for several years."

 

What kind of "system" can it be if they have been playing the same numbers for several years?  Sounds mighty strange to me.

RJOh's avatar - chipmunk
Platinum Member
Top 25 Poster
Elite
mid-Ohio
United States
Member #9
March 24, 2001
9264 Posts
Offline
Posted: August 22, 2008, 11:12 pm - IP Logged Bottom Top

It's not much of a system for jackpot games if it came up with the same combination four times unless they were playing to win several lower tiers prizes.   Since one ticket can win as much as four tickets when the same person owns them, it makes more sense to not have repeats unless you were playing a pick3/4 game.

* Trying is the first step toward failure *
homer J. Simpson

ThatScaryChick's avatar - myselfsimis1
Platinum Member
Advanced
Idaho
United States
Member #56982
November 21, 2007
1705 Posts
Offline
Posted: August 23, 2008, 12:11 am - IP Logged Bottom Top

Whatever system they used, it sure paid off! Congrats to them, again!

justxploring's avatar - villiarna
Standard Member
Top 50 Poster
Veteran
Sunny SW Florida
United States
Member #25708
November 5, 2005
4080 Posts
Offline
Posted: August 23, 2008, 12:15 am - IP Logged Bottom Top

"But after presenting the first two tickets, Judith Adamson said, "I'm in a state of shock." She also said they had been playing the same numbers for several years."

 

What kind of "system" can it be if they have been playing the same numbers for several years?  Sounds mighty strange to me.

I Agree!

You took the words right out of my mouth (or should I say fingers?)  I began to type something similar before I saw your post. 

Standard Member
Rookie

United States
Member #53640
June 27, 2007
18 Posts
Offline
Posted: August 23, 2008, 1:44 am - IP Logged Bottom Top

Brad Duke claimed to use a numbering system that had won him a couple hundred dollars (and 85 million) in the Powerball.

Bull.

Sorry guys but it's mathmatically impossible.  ONE:  If such a formula existed, it would have been discovered easily by now.  There is no forumla.  A formula would defeat the entire purpose of the lottery.  TWO:  Lotteries employ a certain range of possibilities, played over a certain population, which USUALLY results in a win a couple of draws later.  MILLIONS of people play random and chosen numbers.  The numbers are drawn RANDOMLY hence...no formula can determine an outcome.  Each player has their own idiosyncrasies; one might say they have a formula, or one might claim they have magic powers, another may claim it's complete luck...maybe even another claims their particular god had something to do with it.  For some reason, most people get behind the "formula" myth.  I think it's the most "credible" myth because it's quasimathmatical and doesn't exclude people by religion or other demographic.  A good way to think of playing the lottery is that you are picking a handful of numbers out of a pool of a HUNDRED MILLION numbers.  That is your number.

jeffrey's avatar - moon
Standard Member
Regular
Hamilton, OH
United States
Member #4236
March 27, 2004
156 Posts
Offline
Posted: August 23, 2008, 2:54 am - IP Logged Bottom Top

Brad Duke claimed to use a numbering system that had won him a couple hundred dollars (and 85 million) in the Powerball.

Bull.

Sorry guys but it's mathmatically impossible.  ONE:  If such a formula existed, it would have been discovered easily by now.  There is no forumla.  A formula would defeat the entire purpose of the lottery.  TWO:  Lotteries employ a certain range of possibilities, played over a certain population, which USUALLY results in a win a couple of draws later.  MILLIONS of people play random and chosen numbers.  The numbers are drawn RANDOMLY hence...no formula can determine an outcome.  Each player has their own idiosyncrasies; one might say they have a formula, or one might claim they have magic powers, another may claim it's complete luck...maybe even another claims their particular god had something to do with it.  For some reason, most people get behind the "formula" myth.  I think it's the most "credible" myth because it's quasimathmatical and doesn't exclude people by religion or other demographic.  A good way to think of playing the lottery is that you are picking a handful of numbers out of a pool of a HUNDRED MILLION numbers.  That is your number.

I agree. A random system will play out the odds. Mathematics is a rock in this respect. Non-random lotteries (i.e. rigged systems and faulty) can be predicted. People who claim life is easy, lunch is free and money falls from the sky in plenty are selling something. Please, don't be a sucker, have fun and play wisely.