Sex offender wins Alaska lottery that aids sex abuse victimsPrevious TopicNext Topic

You obviously don't have children or have never been a victim of rape.  This man can NEVER turn his life around.  He's been convicted 3 times of sexual abuse of a minor.   That's 2 times too much.   He should have been exterminated the first time he took a child's innocence away.  John Couey, who raped & buried little Jessica Lunsford alive clutching onto her teddy bear, had also turned his life around after committing child abuse.  People like this do not change. They are wired wrong. 

<off topic>

@Dead Aim

"I have never seen a post of yours that wasn't meant to counter any line of thinking that was considered normal by the masses."

KYFloyd has had multiple posts on odds, probabilities and other mathematical relations to the lottery.  Most of his other posts appear informative and correct to me. 

</back on topic>

I don't think GOD has anything to do with anything. We only think,wish and hope. I think it's just destiny. We all have our destiny. Bad people win Lotteries. Good people win lotteries. Good people get killed. Bad people get killed. Our destiny is already determined. If you are really meant to win, you will and it's as simple as that.

Are you suggesting that there is fate and a god, but this god has no control over fate? If that's the case, what you call destiny is another god that is (apparently) more powerful than your god. If you think there is only destiny, then that's just another name for your god.

Hey Ky and Jpismine,

the question shouldnt be does god exist, it should be does he/she care enough to let you win

Thanks. They've obviously got a selective memory, or limited exposure to my posts.

I'll freely admit that many of my posts argue against something that was previously said, but I don't see any point in making most of my "contributions" through the use of the "I agree" icon, as is done by some. I only post if I think there's more to be said or something different to be said. I wouldn't say something I didn't believe, and I could care less whether I'm in the majority or not. If it's something that's a factual matter and I'm wrong it shouldn't be hard to offer a rebuttal. If it's a matter of opinion it shouldn't be hard to offer support for an opposing opinion, assuming that opinion has some validity.

truecritic,

That you truly are because it would only take you to do a spell check on such a serious topic.

If you look up critic in one of it's generic forms critic is defined as an unpleasant person as if you should already know.

So now the biggest loooser award goes to you.

<off topic>

@Dead Aim

"I have never seen a post of yours that wasn't meant to counter any line of thinking that was considered normal by the masses."

KYFloyd has had multiple posts on odds, probabilities and other mathematical relations to the lottery.  Most of his other posts appear informative and correct to me. 

</back on topic>