D.C. Council poised to repeal online gambling

Feb 1, 2012, 8:27 am (17 comments)

Online Gambling

WASHINGTON, D.C. — After becoming the first jurisdiction in the nation to legalize online gambling within its borders, the District of Columbia is poised to repeal the program before it launches.

The strong backlash on the D.C. Council to the district's online gambling program has little to do with moral opposition to gambling. Instead, councilmembers are upset with the way it became law, saying they didn't realize they had voted to approve it.

Councilmember Jack Evans told The Associated Press on Tuesday that he plans to move a repeal bill out of his finance and revenue committee on Wednesday. Evans also said he would vote for the repeal bill when it goes before the full council, and the bill appears to have the support of a majority of councilmembers.

Evans, a Ward 2 Democrat, said neither the council nor the public was given enough opportunity to weigh in on the program before it became law. He also said he was troubled by a report from the district's Inspector General that raised questions about changes to the district's contract with its lottery vendor that paved the way for online gambling.

"We just need to start over," he said, adding that he had no plans to introduce a bill.

The program would have allowed people using computers inside the district to play online poker, blackjack and other games of skill and chance. Players would have to be at least 19 years old and would be barred from wagering more than $250 a week.

A Justice Department ruling in December clarified that intrastate online gambling is legal, and several states are considering it, but so far the district and Nevada are the only jurisdictions to approve laws or regulations authorizing it. Nevada officials hope to begin offering online poker by year's end.

In the district, online gambling became law outside the normal legislative process.

The program would have been run by the D.C. Lottery and its Greece-based vendor, Intralot. But when the council approved Intralot's $39 million contract in 2009, the contract did not specify that Intralot would be able to bring online gambling to the district. Instead, it only included language about "nontraditional games."

The contract was later amended to specify that Intralot could implement an online gambling system. Then, in late 2010, Councilmember Michael A. Brown inserted language in a supplemental budget bill that legalized online gambling in the district. It became law last April when Congress declined to intervene.

Several councilmembers have since said they did not realize they were authorizing online gambling as part of the budget bill, and Councilmember David Catania has threatened to sue the district's chief financial officer for altering the lottery contract without council approval.

The council took testimony from the public only after the gambling program became law, and lottery officials held a series of community meetings last fall for people to express their concerns. Civic activists have raised concerns about the security of the software and the broad discretion given to the lottery agency and CFO Natwar Gandhi to run the program.

Evans said Tuesday that competitive bidding would need to be part of any future effort to legalize online gambling in order to ensure that the district, not Intralot, would be the chief beneficiary of the program.

Catania and Councilmember Muriel Bowser, who are on the Finance and Revenue Committee that's chaired by Evans, also intend to vote for repeal. The two other committee members, Brown and Marion Barry, want to see the program go forward.

Brown has pushed online gambling as a source of needed revenue and said it would protect Internet poker players who currently use illegal offshore sites. He said last week that the district would experience "a little bonanza" from becoming the first government to launch an online gambling program.

In addition to Evans, Bowser and Catania, at least three other members of the 12-person council support repeal: Jim Graham, Phil Mendelson and Tommy Wells, who introduced the bill. Council Chairman Kwame Brown has not taken a position on repeal but has said numerous times that he opposes all gambling.

Mayor Vincent Gray also wants to see online gambling repealed, said his spokesman, Pedro Ribeiro.

"It's become such a divisive issue. It's not critical to the fiscal needs of the city," Ribeiro said. "It's just better to stop this, take a few steps back, take a deep breath and figure out where to go from here."

AP

Comments

JAP69's avatarJAP69

Several councilmembers have since said they did not realize they were authorizing online gambling as part of the budget bill

_________________________________

There are too many bills passed or voted down in all levels of gov't as they do not take the time to fully read a bill and fully debate it. It is pathetic that we have this nonsense occur in gov't

dpoly1's avatardpoly1

And they want to be the 51st State ...................... Stooges

Cletu$2's avatarCletu$2

Quote: Originally posted by JAP69 on Feb 1, 2012

Several councilmembers have since said they did not realize they were authorizing online gambling as part of the budget bill

_________________________________

There are too many bills passed or voted down in all levels of gov't as they do not take the time to fully read a bill and fully debate it. It is pathetic that we have this nonsense occur in gov't

The council members are just preparing to run for higher office.They need to practice being stupid before taking the plunge.

Littleoldlady's avatarLittleoldlady

No, they don't want to miss the opportunity to get their "ticket" punched.  If it turns out to be a good thing, they want part of it and if they have "friends", they might want to shift some those contract dollars to their friends.  I just don't know how the council members didn't know what they were voting for..must have been in a foreign  language like English.

JAP69's avatarJAP69

Yep,

It is a laugh every day with the stupidity of some politicians. ROFL

rad242

D.C. Council meet Hooked on Phonics

 

Hooked on Phonics meet D.C. Council

Seattlejohn

They didn't know they were voting for online gambling as part of the budget?  It makes me wonder if these politicians are lazy, incompetent or just STUPID.  More than likely, they voted for online gambling (due to wanting more revenue for the area, or they were paid off to do so), and got handed their butts in public outrage against it, so they're scrambling to save face.  I say toss the lot of them out and "start again"...

MississippiMudd

Quote: Originally posted by Seattlejohn on Feb 1, 2012

They didn't know they were voting for online gambling as part of the budget?  It makes me wonder if these politicians are lazy, incompetent or just STUPID.  More than likely, they voted for online gambling (due to wanting more revenue for the area, or they were paid off to do so), and got handed their butts in public outrage against it, so they're scrambling to save face.  I say toss the lot of them out and "start again"...

 It makes me wonder if these politicians are lazy, incompetent or just STUPID. 

Why do we have to choose -- I vote for all three!!!!

WWWBUKTN

As long as I can start playing poker online again I don't care what they do.

Guru101's avatarGuru101

They voted for something they didn't know they was voting for?Bash

rdgrnr's avatarrdgrnr

Quote: Originally posted by Guru101 on Feb 2, 2012

They voted for something they didn't know they was voting for?Bash

They took Democrat Nancy Pelosi's advice and Democrat Harry Reid's advice literally. With Obamacare and all the bailouts of the banks and Wall Street and the Stimulus Bills they said it was an emergency and there was no time to read it.

Pelosi said "We have to pass the bill to see what's in it."

Sounds perfectly reasonable, doesn't it?

NightStalker's avatarNightStalker

What's even more amazing is the fact that Marion Barry has a felony drug conviction and is able to hold a public office.  He can't even vote, but somehow he can hold office?!?!  WTF!?!?Cussing Face

rdgrnr's avatarrdgrnr

Quote: Originally posted by NightStalker on Feb 2, 2012

What's even more amazing is the fact that Marion Barry has a felony drug conviction and is able to hold a public office.  He can't even vote, but somehow he can hold office?!?!  WTF!?!?Cussing Face

They don't care what he does as long as he keeps up the struggle for free stuff.

lchoro

Maryland Lottery appears to be the first state to put up an online lottery ticket purchase capability.  They're expected to be uip within 12 months and budgeted for the web site upgrade in FY2013.  Many states start their fiscal calendar on July 1.

 

http://baltimore.citybizlist.com/1/2012/2/1/Online-Lottery-Ticket-Sales-Expected-To-Start-Next-Year-Boost-Sales.aspx

Subscribe to this news story