Welcome Guest
Log In | Register )
The time is now 11:38 pm
You last visited July 24, 2014, 11:38 pm
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

Pa. Gov. defends lottery privatization exploration

Pennsylvania LotteryPennsylvania Lottery: Pa. Gov. defends lottery privatization exploration
11
Rating:

If privatizing the Pennsylvania Lottery's management isn't the answer to ensuring reliable and predictable funding for programs for older Pennsylvanians, what is?

That's the question that a spokesman for Gov. Tom Corbett raised in responding to state Treasurer Rob McCord call on Monday to pull the plug on the administration's lottery private management agreement (PMA) pursuit.

"Our need is outpacing our ability to fund those programs," said Corbett press secretary Jay Pagni. "The PMA is a vehicle that can assure our ability to meet the continued growth of the programs as well as grow the lottery.

"That's why we've embarked upon it and it's unfortunate Mr. McCord is putting politics before programs for older Pennsylvanians," Pagni added.

McCord, at a news conference in Philadelphia, pointed to the $3.4 million that has been paid out of the Lottery Fund to date to cover fees charged by consultants assisting the Corbett Administration in its exploration of this outsourcing and called it wasted money that could have gone to fund senior programs.

He urged Corbett "to put this failed and costly experiment to an end."

Corbett signed a proposed agreement with United Kingdom-based Camelot Global Services in January to take over the state lottery's management. But Attorney General Kathleen Kane rejected the deal, citing constitutional and other objections.

Since then, the administration has been seeking extensions to Camelot's bid to keep it alive as it works with its legal consultant, DLA Piper, in trying to overcome the issues related to the contract that drew Kane's rejection.

The latest extension expires on Tuesday, Pagni said look for an announcement on Tuesday about the administration's next move.

Camelot, which was the lone company to submit a bid on this outsourcing, is promising to generate $34.6 billion in profits over the next 20 years.

That promise is backed up by a $200 million fund to cover any shortfall if it fails to meet annual profit commitments although critics of the deal cite concerns about how ironclad that commitment is.

PennLive reported earlier on Monday, the fees associated with this privatization exploration are now able to climb as high as $4.3 million under revisions made to the contract with DLA Piper.

Contrary to McCord's painting that spending as a waste, Pagni called it a wise and valuable investment of resources.

"The money spent on this is an investment in long-term returns for the lottery program," Pagni said. "We received information, ideas, best practices from organizations that have provided consultation for national lotteries and international lotteries across the world. Most assuredly, we will benefit from this process."

Meanwhile, the in-house operation of the lottery has continued its winning ways, revenue-wise.

For the first quarter of the fiscal year that ended Sept. 30, ticket sales topped $936.6 million, according to information from the state Department of Revenue, which oversees the lottery. That is more than 7 percent above the ticket sales for the same three-month period last year when the lottery went on to end the year with a record-high $3.69 billion in ticket sales.

Patriot-News

We'd love to see your comments here!  Register for a FREE membership — it takes just a few moments — and you'll be able to post comments here and on any of our forums. If you're already a member, you can Log In to post a comment.

3 comments. Last comment 8 months ago by jamella724.
Page 1 of 1
Avatar
Marana AZ
United States
Member #145346
August 3, 2013
145 Posts
Offline
Posted: October 29, 2013, 6:28 pm - IP Logged

Since when has putting a middle-man into the supply chain ever generated positive results? A private operator needs to make a profit. That profit either comes at the state's expense, players' expense, or both. This privatization plan is incrediibly stupid.

    Avatar

    United States
    Member #78052
    August 6, 2009
    700 Posts
    Online
    Posted: October 30, 2013, 4:41 am - IP Logged

    According to Rep. Louise Williams News Letter I get each month from her office this is the breakdown on the PA Lottery.

     

    Pace/PACENET ................................................. 29,532,789

    Area Agencies on Aging and Senior Centers  .........48,684.981

    Pennsylvania Department of Transportation ..........71,709,762

    Pennsylvani Office of Long Term Living ................19,843,198

     

    Lottery Prizes paid to Winners ..........................290,428,295

    Tally for Fiscal Year ........................................500,640,025

     

    NOW...... Where are we suppose to "CUT" so the third party that will "Oversea" the operation of the PA Lottery for their share of the pie?  Cut out the Senior's bennies?   That is WHY the lottery was set up for!!  To help the Elderly!! 

     

    What about the PA Workers that work for the PA Lottery now?  Layoff's???  So we are going to ship more jobs overseas?   The Lottery is making a profit, it is self generating revenue.  Why is Corbin want to give away our money and not keep it in our own State, our own Country?   Seriously, does it make any sense??  I have been following this DumbA**'s actions in the Governor's office since he has been elected.  And if I were you, I would keep my eyes on him too.   He is up to no good, and the above numbers should tell you there isn't a problem with the PA Lottery but Gov Corbin.

     

    If you enjoy the PA Lottery, like having a hit with the payouts as they are now the do all of us a favor !!!

    CALL AND COMPLAIN ABOUT THE SALE!! 

    MAKE NOISE!! 

    DON'T TAKE IT SITTING ON YOUR RUMP AND DO NOTHING!

    Life Is Wonderful If You Don't Weaken

      Avatar
      Texas
      United States
      Member #132460
      September 4, 2012
      483 Posts
      Offline
      Posted: November 17, 2013, 5:41 am - IP Logged

      Before they make any decisions, they should remember their purpose of having the lottery in the first place. If the privitization will add burden to their people I think they have to reconsider. They might be after for the increase revenue however if the people don't agree with them they might lose revenue instead of increasing it.