The time is now 3:40 pm
You last visited
April 19, 2024, 3:36 pm
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)
Oct 17, 2003, 4:48 am (3 comments)
The arguing, at times, seemed personal on a panel which featured everyone from lawmakers to ministers.
At issue -- just how much money is being lost to border states like South Carolina, which has a lottery.
"The state has noticed most sales tax rise in history on things like chips since the lottery came," said panelist Gardner Payne. "We're losing that money to those states."
Last December, North Carolina drivers poured across the border for the $100-million-plus Powerball drawing.
Governor Easley wants to use that money to fund education. But opponents call the lottery "bad government,"saying the state will start depending on profit which are often exaggerated.
"Let me see a show of hands of everyone here who is going to spend $870 dollars a year on lottery tickets to meet estimates," joked panelist Don Carrington.
Some in the audience stood up with concerns, worried the money could be used to cut taxes for big companies. Supporters say they can prdvent that.
On this night, the fighting dventually subsided, following a debate that again seems destined for the state house.
WECT
It seems like all North Carolina have to do is let the people decide for themselves. We can make a decision on how to spend our hard earn money. Let the people vote on the lottery.
people decide for themselves since when does that happen?
seems like old tired arguements against the lottery. if they are so worried about the people in their state playing lotteries and going to casino's to meet their gambling desires then they dont deserve any money if they dont have a lottery in their state. i like how the main concern was that they might cut tax for their big companies. we shafted boeing with tax and guess what - they moved and are probably going to shut down some plants here next year - if you piss off the big companies that hire people then they can move.
dvdiva: