Welcome Guest
Log In | Register )

Quick Links

USA Mega

NetConnect

Internet Domains, simple and cheap

Find a domain name:

Home

Lottery Results GadgetPetition for True Lottery Drawings
The time is now 7:04 am
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

Lottery nixes man's bid to buy 7 million tickets

Nov 14, 2003, 5:13 am

Massachusetts LotteryMassachusetts Lottery: Lottery nixes man's bid to buy 7 million tickets

A deep-pocketed mystery man from Chicago tried to bet an odds-skewing $7 million on the Mass Millions numbers game this week after Lottery officials opened the door by helping him buy 60,000 of the dollar tickets just last week.

Lottery officials furiously backpedaled yesterday, refusing to release the man's identity even as they admitted they have no idea where his cash came from - raising fears among lawmakers that a mobster or drug kinpin may be trying to launder money through the Lottery.

"I'm worried about where that kind of money comes from," said state Rep. George N. Peterson (R-Grafton). "There aren't a lot of people who walk around with a cashier's check for $7 (million) to $10 million in their pockets."

The Lottery dventually turned down the huge request and Lottery Director Joseph C. Sullivan, while admitting the $60,000 bet struck officials as "unique," said Lottery policies do not require special actions for such a large bet.

"We financially, legally followed all procedures," Sullivan said. "We're looking at whether or not we have to institute a policy."

The trouble began last Thursday, when the mystery man walked into the Lottery's Braintree headquarters and asked to buy $60,000 worth of "quick picks" for that night's Mass Millions drawing, Lottery officials confirmed.

The man offered a $60,000 cashier's check, which Lottery officials verified was legitimate and promptly turned into 60,000 tickets - producing $6,000 worth of winners, sources say.

Lottery officials acknowledged that, over the ensuing six days, the man raised the specter of buying between 7 million and 10 million tickets for last night's drawing.

After laying the groundwork to accept the man's massive second wager in the wake of the first outlay, Sullivan said agency officials got cold feet and called off the bet.

Had the man been allowed to purchase 7 million tickets, he would have cornered half of the game's possible number combinations - boosting his chances of hitting the $38.9 million jackpot to 50-50, compared to the 1 in 14 million odds for a single-ticket player.

"The Lottery exists for all its players," Sullivan said. "One player seeking to potentially buy a jackpot goes against the spirit of our mission."

Sullivan refused to release the man's name or whether he has any financial backers, saying only, "He wishes not to be identified."

With staff discussions underway over what to do, the Lottery on Wednesday canceled an agent training session to free up a roomful of game terminals at Lottery headquarters, as a "precautionary" measure in case they needed to key in millions of tickets for the man, Sullivan said.

While trying to downplay the massive potential bet as a "hypothetical," Sullivan defended his decision to make preparations for accepting the wager - which was called off Wednesday night.

"A request, no matter how unusual it may be, needs to be considered," Sullivan said.

In the end, Lottery officials said they gave the man a list of the state's 7,300 agents and told him to buy the tickets individually.

State lawmakers were flabbergasted that the agency would take $60,000 in one fell swoop at all - let alone mull a bet as high as $10 million.

Wall Street gets suspicious and conducts a thorough vetting when somebody tries to buy a huge number of stocks, said Peterson, a regular Lottery player.

Officials put the man through a "thorough background check," which Sullivan defined as verifying the validity of his driver's license and cashier's check.

Treasurer Timothy P. Cahill said through a spokeswoman he agrees with the Lottery's decision to accept the $60,000.

A cashier's check is the most secure form of payment the Lottery accepts, and banks that issue such checks for more than $10,000 report it to the IRS, spokeswoman Karen Sharma said.

"The treasurer is comfortable that this is not money laundering," Sharma said, acknowledging, however, that Treasury officials have not conferred with the IRS.

Boston Herald

We'd love to see your comments here!  Register for a FREE membership — it takes just a few moments — and you'll be able to post comments here and on any of our forums. If you're already a member, you can Log In to post a comment.

20 comments. Last comment 8 years ago by Todd.
Page 1 of 2
RJOh's avatar - chipmunk
mid-Ohio
United States
Member #9
March 24, 2001
13452 Posts
Offline
Posted: November 14, 2003, 5:56 am - IP Logged

Sounds like one of those Lottery Investment Syndicates.  Years ago a T.V. show 'How They Do That' featured a story about one that won the Virgina lottery, but they took over terminals at a few 7-11 stores an played 80% of the possible combinations.  The group said they looked for state lotteries that had jackpots with cash values greater than the odds of winnings and invested in them.  Right after that Virgina changed its lotteries laws so no single group could take over enough terminals to do that again. 

RJOh

* THat which happens most *
* is most likely to happen again *
 

Thumbs Up

    Avatar

    United States
    Member #436
    June 30, 2002
    675 Posts
    Offline
    Posted: November 14, 2003, 5:57 am - IP Logged

    I had heard a story about a group of investors from Austrailia that attempted to buy the Virginia lottery a few years back. They went about filling in the punch cards themselves and then taking them to individual ticket sellers around the state. They never purchased enough tickets to cover every combo, but they bought about 75% of them. And they did win. And they were the only winners.

      Avatar

      United States
      Member #436
      June 30, 2002
      675 Posts
      Offline
      Posted: November 14, 2003, 5:59 am - IP Logged

      Wow spooky. We basically po

        RJOh's avatar - chipmunk
        mid-Ohio
        United States
        Member #9
        March 24, 2001
        13452 Posts
        Offline
        Posted: November 14, 2003, 6:10 am - IP Logged

        Sounds like this guy is working alone, that syndicate have a big group of bonded people to play their cards.  I guess some of the politicians don't want the lottery to be a sure thing.  They would really go nuts if someone came up with a system that with $20K they could win a lottery jackpot 50% of the time.

        RJOh

        * THat which happens most *
        * is most likely to happen again *
         

        Thumbs Up

          fja's avatar - gnome1

          United States
          Member #91
          January 19, 2002
          7984 Posts
          Offline
          Posted: November 14, 2003, 7:34 am - IP Logged

          With That kind of WAM (walk

          "Everybody has to believe in something...I believe I'll have another beer!"   = W.C.Fields                      


            United States
            Member #380
            June 5, 2002
            11296 Posts
            Offline
            Posted: November 14, 2003, 8:06 am - IP Logged

            I bet he doesn't even know that the game still does NOT offer a cash option.

              Todd's avatar - Cylon 2.gif
              Chief Bottle Washer
              New Jersey
              United States
              Member #1
              May 31, 2000
              19721 Posts
              Offline
              Posted: November 14, 2003, 8:08 am - IP Logged

              Hey, that's pretty funny!  The guy would probably just do better to invest his $10 Million, rather than to pay the lottery $10 mil for an annuity.

               

              Check the State Lottery Report Card
              What grade did your lottery earn?

               

              Sign the Petition for True Lottery Drawings
              Help eliminate computerized drawings!


                United States
                Member #380
                June 5, 2002
                11296 Posts
                Offline
                Posted: November 14, 2003, 8:11 am - IP Logged

                That's the sad truth, Todd.

                  MichiganHopeful's avatar - WINGS

                  United States
                  Member #549
                  August 8, 2002
                  134 Posts
                  Offline
                  Posted: November 14, 2003, 10:29 am - IP Logged

                  He already lost very bad...He spent $60,000 to win $6,000...obviously a man willing to bet that kind of money and get that kind of return...and yet still attempt to bet again with even more money does not really care about the return that he will get. Who bets $7 million dollars without a sure return on his money?

                    twisted's avatar - underground
                    New Jersey
                    United States
                    Member #2418
                    September 25, 2003
                    582 Posts
                    Offline
                    Posted: November 14, 2003, 12:31 pm - IP Logged

                    He is either very very smart or very very stupid.

                      JAZZY JASPER's avatar - scenery water_mountains.jpg

                      United States
                      Member #791
                      October 14, 2002
                      2723 Posts
                      Offline
                      Posted: November 16, 2003, 1:37 am - IP Logged

                      Hmmm!

                      "It's not easy, being, GREEN! "


                       

                        Avatar
                        New Member
                        Salem Ohio
                        United States
                        Member #2845
                        November 16, 2003
                        1 Posts
                        Offline
                        Posted: November 16, 2003, 5:54 am - IP Logged

                        Well while we are discussing plans let me explain mine. The old Super Lotto here in Ohio was 6/47 with 10,737,573 combos. My plan was to create a club of 107,375 members. Each member had a pre selected set of 100 non repeated combos, that no other member had. When the jackpot hit a target of say 50 million we bet. One of the members had to hit. The member did not share the winnings. I got as far as getting a newsletter set up, most of the programming up and running and decided I better check with the lottery. They to say the least did not share my enthusiasm for the idea. I received a letter from the Chief Legal Council herself explaining the law and letting me know just what would happen if I tried such an dvent. They called it a block bet. In other words I would of kept someone from being the sole winner. Man it would of been fun. I would like to try the Mega Millions, sort of. Covering the first 5 would be easy, but the 52 of the 5 would be the killer.

                          Littleoldlady's avatar - basket
                          Clarksville
                          United States
                          Member #489
                          July 15, 2002
                          13552 Posts
                          Offline
                          Posted: November 16, 2003, 8:12 am - IP Logged

                          He is a candidate for Gamblers Anonymous or the looney bin.

                          It takes Everyone's input to HIT the number..all are equally important.

                            RJOh's avatar - chipmunk
                            mid-Ohio
                            United States
                            Member #9
                            March 24, 2001
                            13452 Posts
                            Offline
                            Posted: November 16, 2003, 1:00 pm - IP Logged

                            Sweat,

                            I'm from from central Ohio too.  Before I retired, I worked with a guy who tried to organize a similar scheme, but he would going to sell each member a set of numbers to play and make his money off selling the numbers,but he couldn't get ten people to join, so the scheme never got off the ground. At the time, our town had about 25,000 people and about 2,500 lottery players who bought $5-$10 of tickets per draw and nobody had ever won the big jackpot, so he couldn't convince anyone that would change if everyone bought their numbers off of him.

                            Some time back, before posters had to register, someone posted a link at this forum to a group in Canada that had a scheme like you suggested for their 649 lotteries. They claim they could cover all the mostly likely combinations with about 300,000 lines and hit 30% of the time.  They required a $10,000 deposit up front to get into one of their investment groups of 200 people.  They had an impressive website from which you could download a pdf file with a lot of data showing their past performance, but I think it was a scam because I never heard about them from any other source.

                            Like I stated in an earlier post, there was a time when some lotteries had jackpots valued several times the odds of winning and such schemes made sense and worked, but today I seldom see a lottery where the cash prize is more than the odds of winning.

                            RJOh

                            * THat which happens most *
                            * is most likely to happen again *
                             

                            Thumbs Up