"Democrats Unveil Their Iraq Plan

Comment #5

Rick G — Wed, 22 Nov 2006 23:14:02 GMT

Boy I hated it when the current Democratic president convinced the current 109th Democratic Congress and the world to invade a country under false pretenses in 2003. Now it's time to change the diapers. "Mommy can you do this? It's not my fault junior crapped in his pants...I only gave him a little Ex-lax".

Comment #4

konane — Wed, 22 Nov 2006 01:42:33 GMT

JAP .... yes agree what's been carefully orchestrated by the left is going to lay blame at the feet of the ones trying to do what's correct in a very difficult situation. Hey there were only 12 years of UN resolutions Saddam saluted with his middle finger before we went back in to take him out. Guess we should have given him another 12 so he could go nuclear!!

Comment #3

konane — Wed, 22 Nov 2006 01:35:24 GMT

In my book, Jim695, you've always had a winning idea. I'd go for the bullet tip being dipped in lard but pigs blood is better. Terms of combat are being dictated by 5th century savages in a very tedious protracted war. Saw it stated it will probably last for 30 years which is likely correct by the time victory is realized. Effective change has to come from within which is going to take time and expend many lives of those challenging their status quo. In the meanwhile we need to forego PC ... [ More ]

Comment #2

jim695 — Wed, 22 Nov 2006 01:01:52 GMT

While I will admit that Mr. O'Bama's star is rising rapidly, he simply doesn't have the requisite experience to postulate on such matters as though he knows what he's talking about. He's still a freshman, and his views should be tempered by that fact alone. Even so, O'Bama has emerged as the E.F. Hutton of the 21st century, because when he speaks, people in politics listen; I have no idea why, but I believe he'll be a major player in another few years. Anyway, I agree with JAP69 - surrender does... [ More ]

Comment #1

JAP69 — Tue, 21 Nov 2006 21:50:38 GMT

What plan? Failure in Iraq is going to be blamed on Bush and the Iraqis themselves for not pulling together their defense for freedom.

Original Blog Entry: "Democrats Unveil Their Iraq Plan

konane — Tue, 21 Nov 2006 14:41:39 GMT

Effeminate congress .... cut and run ... Failure is their benchmark.

"DEMOCRATS UNVEIL THEIR IRAQ PLAN

"Senator Barack Obama gave a speech yesterday calling for the withdrawal of American troops from Iraq. He used the Democratic code phrase for surrender: "phased redeployment." Sounds like the insurgency in Iraq has a new best friend. But really, it's the same story over and over again. The tune from the Democrats on Iraq hasn't changed one bit since the 2004 election. They simply want us to cut and run in Iraq. In some corners that might be known as surrender.

Other than criticizing the administration and saying President Bush wasn't prosecuting the war in Iraq right, not a single Democrat has stepped forward with a solution to Iraq. Obama is no different. Do they really think total surrender is a policy? Is the United States going to somehow be better off with Al-Qaeda running the show in Baghdad?

And sadly, the media will never call them on it. They're being given a pass on Iraq. Democrats are allowed to criticize the war without offering an alternate plan. It's the worst possible criticism: telling somebody what they're doing is wrong without offering any possible way to make it better. But that's been the media double-standard on Iraq since the fall of Baghdad.

So it doesn't matter if the Democrats pick their best orator to deliver the same tired policy. It's still a bad idea. But if they've got any ideas on Iraq...we're listening. They just haven't had any yet.

In the meantime ... the Islamic fascists are smiling. The great Satan is turning yellow. "

http://boortz.com/nuze/index.html