US satellite data shows global temps are FALLING

Comment #31

Todd — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 11:31:47 GMT

@Tenaj: I do not lie. Not nice. Would you like me to enter you blog and post that you are lying? I'd appreciate if you would not muddy up my blog with nasty comments.

Comment #30

jarasan — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 02:20:04 GMT

Power of suggestion = Intellectual honesty coupled with learning. This discussion is good because it is typed and written, therefore a permanent record. Tenaj, you have yet to present a single fact to refute any of the evidence that global warming is a hoax. Tenaj, your rhetoric is blithe, off topic, and unsubstantiated. Could you please present some empirical evidence that humanity is responsible for climate change (global warming). Is that possible? For eg.: Tell us where (link) th... [ More ]

Comment #29

Tenaj — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 00:23:10 GMT

The power of suggestion is powerful and you are quiet crafty at it Todd. I haven't said anything that gives the impression that I'm upset. Another lie. It works well for you. Not upset folks. Don't believe it. But believe that it's the media's job to sway your opinion. Just consider the source first. The presidential election is coming up and we will hear lies that sound like the truth. Don't allow yourself to be saddled with unimportant issues that are only there as a smokescreen. ... [ More ]

Comment #28

Todd — Wed, 28 Nov 2007 20:02:29 GMT

Whatever. It's obvious that you are upset. I don't think I'm saying anything new or outrageous. Based on what you're saying, I just think I have more knowledge in the areas of politics and global warming, but hey, I guess you feel the same way. That is called an impasse, and I wish you well in life.

Comment #27

Tenaj — Wed, 28 Nov 2007 19:37:21 GMT

Todd said: You are making your strenuous arguments based on other people's say-so. To Todd: That is so very insulting, and condescending. I do not base my opinions on propaganda. I base them on as closest I can get to fact. Everything that is moved out of it's original state loses something, especially ideas and concepts and can be presented to mean something entirely different with a convincing argument. But your insults are laughable because they just confirm what I already know. A... [ More ]

Comment #26

Todd — Wed, 28 Nov 2007 17:34:05 GMT

Please don't tell me what I mean. When I say liberal, I mean liberal, not Democrat. Yes, there are lots of liberal Democrats, but there are plenty of liberal Republicans too, a fact that makes the party worse-off. You keep equating party with philosophy, and I just gotta tell you that you are off-base. However, there are plenty of other people who make that same mistake -- it's not just you. Liberals support global warming because either (a) other liberals (like the mainstream media) co... [ More ]

Comment #25

Tenaj — Wed, 28 Nov 2007 15:36:28 GMT

Todd it's as simple as this: For the most part Democrat = Liberal = NOT REPUBLICAN Republican = Conservative = not liberal, not Democrat Todd said: I wish you would stop saying a political party all does one thing or feels one thing. To Todd: Why do you wish I stop doing something that you do? When you say Liberal - you mean not Republican or conservative. No fancy definition is needed for liberal, they are Democrats for the most part. So when you say that liberal doesn't mean Democ... [ More ]

Comment #24

four4me — Wed, 28 Nov 2007 15:22:19 GMT

so what do you call a demopublican Lol ha ha ha ha ha ha

Comment #23

Todd — Wed, 28 Nov 2007 13:10:00 GMT

@Tenaj: You keep comparing "Republicans" with "liberals". They do not compare. I say liberals because I mean people with a liberal philosophy, not "Democrats" or "Republicans". I wish you would stop saying a political party all does one thing or feels one thing.

Comment #22

Tenaj — Wed, 28 Nov 2007 01:23:50 GMT

Don't apologize rcbbuckeye, you didn't offend anyone. Certainly not me. You'll entitled to your opinion. None of those things describe me. I think it's funny that some people are denying global warming when Al Gore has already received accolades and it's already been proven true. And someone else's lifestyle does not make global warming true or false.

Comment #21

rcbbuckeye — Wed, 28 Nov 2007 00:39:56 GMT

I apologize for using the term "Chicken Little". I didn't realize it would offend anyone, which was not my intention. I used that term because that is what all this global warming rant from Al Gore and friends reminds me of. My final point remains that many of the ones crying global warming and wanting everyone to change their lifestyle can't be bothered to changed their own lifestyle. Think of a certain presidential candidate who built a 25,000 sq ft mansion.

Comment #20

reddog — Tue, 27 Nov 2007 23:48:20 GMT

Todd, I have been against this Global warming b.s. for some time now. Al Gore and his cronies have fooled alot of people . The Peace Prize he recieved was a joke. It's no use trying to talk common sense on this subject.

Comment #19

jarasan — Tue, 27 Nov 2007 23:45:23 GMT

Liberal doesn't mean democrat, just like conservative doesn't mean republican. Here is another one: Hurricane season ends Friday, the forecasters were wrong again! For the third year in row, they severely over-estimated the number of hurricanes expected forecast. Weren't the oceans getting so warm that super-global-warming-induced hurricanes would destroy the world? P.S. I asked about politics and Global Warming.

Comment #18

Tenaj — Tue, 27 Nov 2007 23:42:36 GMT

Sorry Todd that was last post was meant for jararan. Todd, you make me laugh. My reply to you is "Um huh"

Comment #17

Tenaj — Tue, 27 Nov 2007 23:28:08 GMT

Todd I was just stating what you said but replaced the wording with Republican where you had Liberal and Denial where you had support. Yes, what does global warming have to do with politics? You were the one who started talking about how interesting it was that liberals. Well here's what you said. Don't you find it interesting that it is basically only liberal media and organizations that support this global warming nonsense? So answer your own question.

Comment #16

Todd — Tue, 27 Nov 2007 23:21:45 GMT

@Tenaj: I am fair to a fault. "Chicken Little" is not name-calling. It perfectly describes the manner by which global warming fanatics are behaving. Don't you know the story of Chicken Little?? Your use of the word "Republican" is designed to lump every Republican together, and say they are all greedy. There is no way to misinterpret that. Also, it is indeed meant as a way to slam my arguments, by saying that it is a "Republican" argument. Perhaps you intended to say that I am a Repu... [ More ]

Comment #15

jarasan — Tue, 27 Nov 2007 22:53:49 GMT

Tenaj your referral to the republican media is another red herring unfounded fact that you state as fact. Please tell us the names of the republicans at NASA JPL that have been studying ocean currents http://www.nasa.gov/centers/jpl/news/ipy-20071113.html Or the republicans here at this site: http://www.globalwarminghoax.com/news.php I think your firewall needs some adjustments. And what does global warming have to do with politics? Bush believes in it, incredible, you and W agree... [ More ]

Comment #14

Tenaj — Tue, 27 Nov 2007 21:31:53 GMT

I didn't call you a name. I said Republican not Republican's. Just because you'll the website administrator that doesn't mean that you can make us shut up when we don't agree with you politically. I haven't broken any rules. Be fair. You made this statement: Don't you find it interesting that it is basically only liberal media and organizations that support this global warming nonsense? ____________________________________________________________________________ I switched out som... [ More ]

Comment #13

csfb — Tue, 27 Nov 2007 20:45:36 GMT

The UFO's - yes, those "unidentified flying objects". They probably are out to get us.

Comment #12

jarasan — Tue, 27 Nov 2007 19:59:22 GMT

Lets hope mother nature doesn't call in a couple of ringers to take care of the scourge of humanity, let me give you a couple of names, Krakatoa, Minatuba, Yellowstone, the Sun, an asteroid. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Krakatoa If it blows as it has regularly since before the dawn of the scrouge, we can expect a cooler climate for a couple of decades. Or, if Yellowstone: http://vulcan.wr.usgs.gov/Volcanoes/Yellowstone/description_yellowstone.html Now for you lottery players who beli... [ More ]

Comment #11

jim695 — Tue, 27 Nov 2007 19:48:38 GMT

Global warming is the biggest non-event since Y2K. Jim

Comment #10

four4me — Tue, 27 Nov 2007 18:49:04 GMT

Here my view on this for many millions of years our planet and mother nature worked together to heat cool the planet. Now since the industrial age we have greatly offset mother natures ability to contend with itself in other words we as people have polluted it, continue to pollute it. We are deforesting many areas vital to mother natures inner workings. We are burning fossil fuels as fast as we can get them out of the ground. These two things alone are contributing greatly to mother natures inab... [ More ]

Comment #9

Todd — Tue, 27 Nov 2007 15:13:31 GMT

@Janet: you can keep spewing one-liners, because it makes it much clearer who owns the legitimate arguments and the facts. The fact that you want to lump 50% of the country into a "bad" bucket shows that you have abandoned the debate and shifted to name-calling and mud-slinging. That's what people do when they can't debate on the merits. If you want to talk about the facts I always love a good lively discussion, but if you're just going to call me names I'd prefer you didn't.

Comment #8

Tenaj — Tue, 27 Nov 2007 14:15:15 GMT

DENIAL of global warming is just ANOTHER Republican smokescreen to sidestep GREED.

Comment #7

jarasan — Tue, 27 Nov 2007 12:27:34 GMT

How bout the woman who sterilized herself at the age of 27 (wasn't easy, hard to find a doctor to do it!) so she couldn't have children to cause more global warming? She is now 35, her husband gave her a congratulation card when she did it! WOW! What a guy! Bunch of nuts maybe they'll become extinct! I have a name for it "environmentalitis idiosis absurdus syndrome" EIAS.

Comment #6

Todd — Tue, 27 Nov 2007 05:53:18 GMT

@csfb: Had that been unusually *warm* weather, it would be blamed on global warming. See the misinformation at work? Why aren't they questioning themselves with the unusual cold? @four4me: Actually, I think the scientists just say that the Earth is constantly warming and cooling. It has more to do with the fluctuating output of the sun than anything else.

Comment #5

csfb — Tue, 27 Nov 2007 05:38:14 GMT

There was global cooling in my part of the planet - here in sunny southern Califonia. Early this year, real snow blanketed the city, first time in 20 years.

Comment #4

four4me — Tue, 27 Nov 2007 04:37:20 GMT

Many scientist have explained that global warming will eventually cause a deep freeze

Comment #3

Todd — Tue, 27 Nov 2007 02:18:12 GMT

@Tenaj: Just like the entirety of global warming, the polar bear nonsense is also a crock. No, the polar bears aren't drowning. The penguins aren't dying off. In fact, if you were told the truth by the media, you would know that the polar bear population has INCREASED in recent years. The ice that melts does so as a natural occurance. Did you know that as ice melts in one part of the continent, it is GROWING in another? The media (and Al Gore) don't tell you about all the places where t... [ More ]

Comment #2

rcbbuckeye — Tue, 27 Nov 2007 01:37:09 GMT

The earth's temperature has changed up and down for ages. So now, we have all the "Chicken Littles" screaming the sky is falling, when there is no hard data suggesting it is because of the human race. Frankly, every time I see a picture of ice falling off a glacier somewhere, I wonder, was a photographer just happening by that glacier at the "perfect" time to capture the picture? I think those pictures are made to be more than what they are, to make a political point. I am not quite ready to... [ More ]

Comment #1

Tenaj — Tue, 27 Nov 2007 00:30:32 GMT

Then why are the polar bears drowning from ice melting when they can swim for 8 hours and the penguins dying. And ice that once was solid for centuries you can now sail ships on the water - opening up a new passage.

Original Blog Entry: US satellite data shows global temps are FALLING

Todd — Tue, 27 Nov 2007 00:16:23 GMT

Global warming is a crock

This statement is nothing new to me, since I've been saying it for so long. But it's taking the media a long time to realize it. Every time someone new pokes their head up out of the sand and sees the facts, it becomes a little saner world.

Still, it's amazing to me that the dedicated "we are destroying the planet" crowd is sinking deeper into delusionment, rather than becoming more enlightened.

Here's the latest, published in today's Telegraph (UK).

We are set on a course of 'planet saving' madness

By Christopher Booker

The scare over global warming, and our politicians' response to it, is becoming ever more bizarre. On the one hand we have the United Nation's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change coming up with yet another of its notoriously politicised reports, hyping up the scare by claiming that world surface temperatures have been higher in 11 of the past 12 years (1995-2006) than ever previously recorded.

This carefully ignores the latest US satellite figures showing temperatures having fallen since 1998, declining in 2007 to a 1983 level - not to mention the newly revised figures for US surface temperatures showing that the 1930s had four of the 10 warmest years of the past century, with the hottest year of all being not 1998, as was previously claimed, but 1934.

On the other hand, we had Gordon Brown last week, in his "first major speech on climate change", airily committing his own and future governments to achieving a 60 per cent reduction in carbon emissions by 2050 - which is rather like prime minister Salisbury at the end of Queen Victoria's reign trying to commit Winston Churchill's government to achieving some wholly impossible goal in the middle of the Second World War.

Mr Brown's only concrete proposal for reaching this absurd target seems to be his plan to ban plastic bags, whatever they have to do with global warming (while his government also plans a near-doubling of flights out of Heathrow).

But of course he is no longer his own master in such fantasy exercises. Few people have yet really taken on board the mind-blowing scale of all the "planet-saving" measures to which we are no....

[ More ]