Hillary's Communist Agenda

Comment #22

pacattack05 — Fri, 15 Feb 2008 02:03:29 GMT

I find it creepy that I mentioned Jim695 on this blog response of mine, only to find out that Florida's winning number tonight was 695....hmmmm....another conspiracy?...lol

Comment #21

Todd — Thu, 14 Feb 2008 22:12:00 GMT

Please stop trying to twist my meaning. You do that almost every time you post to my blog. I am a decent writer, and my point is clear. I do not need you to change my meaning.

Comment #20

Tenaj — Thu, 14 Feb 2008 21:57:31 GMT

Todd, what creative use of semantics - just to say "You'll the one not me" gee You will never hear me say this: You know, the one thing I would really like to see around here -- not that I think there's any chance of seeing it -- is reasoned debate free from dopiness. Because the more diverse the more interesting it is to me. I want to see the crazy stuff because I might see something new. People and their political views don't sway me. I'm more interested in how they go... [ More ]

Comment #19

Todd — Thu, 14 Feb 2008 21:16:29 GMT

We are in Saudi Arabia because it was an American corporation that helped Saudi Arabia tap their oil reserves in the first place. The legitimate Saudi government WANTS us there. It is the radical muslims that don't. And I don't give a crap what THEY want. We are not taking over the world. We are, on the other hand, liberating a great many people around the world, as we have done so for decades. Because countries that are democracies are generally not countries that want to blow us up. ... [ More ]

Comment #18

Todd — Thu, 14 Feb 2008 21:12:33 GMT

I have not given up an ounce of freedom. That is a misuse of Ben Franklin's quote.

Comment #17

pacattack05 — Thu, 14 Feb 2008 21:05:21 GMT

â€œThose who desire to give up freedom in order to gain security will not have, nor do they deserve, either one.â€ Benjamin Franklin

Comment #16

pacattack05 — Thu, 14 Feb 2008 20:56:50 GMT

I think the biggest difference between you and I is whether 9/11 was an inside job. That's where we disagree the most in my opinion. People say that there are infact radical islamists who want to harm us. Of course there are, because we invaded their country for no reason. We've been meddling in everyone's affairs for years now, trying to police the world, and changing the minds and cultures of people that have had those ideals for thousands of years. But we expect to impose our way on them over... [ More ]

Comment #15

Todd — Thu, 14 Feb 2008 20:54:03 GMT

That is an interesting viewpoint.

Comment #14

pacattack05 — Thu, 14 Feb 2008 20:46:31 GMT

You are not seeing the whole picture, that's why the dots seem so remotely apart. I guess we could be on different pages, but I see all the events as one goal. Are you telling me that you think those videos that were taped at bohemian grove are fake? It's been covered by all the major media events sinse the 70's. Not the tapes but the event happening every year in July. I can dig up old 70s pictures that were taken of nixon and reagan in attendance at those events. You speak of connecti... [ More ]

Comment #13

Todd — Thu, 14 Feb 2008 20:46:03 GMT

@Pac: Jim's ordeal was an issue related to local (state?) law enforcement, it did not relate to the Feds. We were just talking about Federal stuff with the protection act. I think a better comparison would be to look at what issues are important to a liberal president vs. a conservative. President Clinton's administration focused on trying to bring down groups of Americans and law-abiding immigrants. Typical examples of their handiwork include Ruby Ridge, Waco, and Elian Gonzalez. Clint... [ More ]

Comment #12

Todd — Thu, 14 Feb 2008 20:30:21 GMT

Whoa, that's wack. A little too extreme for me. I don't think President Bush's desire to renew the measures that have protecting us since 9/11 have anything to do with a world government spoken about by his father. You're connecting dots that are not even on the same page. I'm not saying that there isn't a movement of a NWO (New World Order), but I think stuff like NAFTA has more to do with that. It's more of an economic thing. Ultimately, everything in the whole world is connected, bu... [ More ]

Comment #11

pacattack05 — Thu, 14 Feb 2008 20:28:51 GMT

Jarasan, I'm not a terrorist, but you don't even have to be one for them to unjustly invade your home. You people think these isolated events will stay that way. Just mark my words, it will hit home, and when a person like jim695 posted here on the blog of what hell he went through, maybe you'll see that you don't have to be a terrorist to go through this. I'm sure you'll raise bloody hell murder if it happens to you. If you don't belive this will escalate, just re-read some history books.

Comment #10

pacattack05 — Thu, 14 Feb 2008 20:23:20 GMT

Bush wants to keep it going on, not because it'll help him with Haliburton or whatever. But it does help the continued mission of the one world govt. which senior bush said out of his own mouth while he was president, wanted to one day establish. BTW, Alex Jones who is the front runner in exposing these people criticizes both parties. He's asked both parties why they go to a two week event every July at Bohemian grove. north of Sanfrancisco, and dress up in Klu Klux Klan garb, worshipping a 6... [ More ]

Comment #9

jarasan — Thu, 14 Feb 2008 20:21:55 GMT

Pac, I have a friend who works on the fugitive squad, and they do break doors down, and they do take fugitives out of their HIDING places and take them straight to jail, do not collect $200. I absolutley have no problem with that. And back in the 70's they should have rounded up those mescaline dealers up there in Times Square and thrown the key away. If you are not a terrorist you really don't have to be so paranoid. Paranoia is a deep destroya. If you are a terrorist and you live next ... [ More ]

Comment #8

Todd — Thu, 14 Feb 2008 20:01:21 GMT

By the way, posting blog entries and articles published by left-wing smear merchants does not count as "proof" in my book. Neither do the 9/11 conspiracy videos and articles you posted. You know, the ones that make the case that President Bush and/or the Israelis planned and executed 9/11. That stuff may be "proof" to you, but to me it's lunacy.

Comment #7

Todd — Thu, 14 Feb 2008 19:58:19 GMT

And President Bush is "scrambling to keep the eavesdropping and surveillance crap going on well after he's gone" for what purpose? Does that help "his oil buddies at Haliburton"? Does it help him "cover up all the lies about weapons of mass destruction"? Does it help his legacy in the history books? See, I just can't figure one good reason why President Bush would give a crap about what you're saying on the phone to your neighbor. I can, however, understand why he would want to make sur... [ More ]

Comment #6

pacattack05 — Thu, 14 Feb 2008 19:42:13 GMT

I just watched Bush on the tube, and he was so mad that the democrats didn't stop everything they were doing to renew the "The Protect american act". The republicans actually walked out of the building in protest. I think that tells you something, dosen't it? Bush has only a little time left and he's scrambling to keep the eavesdropping and surveillance crap going on well after he's gone. All under the guise of protecting the people. Give me a break. It's one thing to think that conspirac... [ More ]

Comment #5

Todd — Thu, 14 Feb 2008 18:05:40 GMT

Oh please Janet. To hear you speak of "smug" and "arrogant" is truly a case of the pot calling the kettle black. I guess we can't all live up to your wide-ranging life experiences and buckets of wisdom. I'm not sure who the "we" are that you're referring to. (The ones who know crap when they see it.) Are you speaking for yourself, or are you the spokesperson for a clique? I hope you're able to recognize it upon self-inspection too.

Comment #4

Tenaj — Thu, 14 Feb 2008 16:55:24 GMT

Oh, how smug and arrogant we are. The dopeys need us to think for them. If only they would open their minds to everything we have to say and let us show them how it should be done. They are clueless. A classic case of intellectual bigotry. gee And Todd, what do you expect from someone like LottoMike that still calls people "colored" we are not idiots, we know crap when we see it. And ya'll ain't as smart as you think you are because if you were smart at all the first thing you'll k... [ More ]

Comment #3

jarasan — Thu, 14 Feb 2008 14:54:06 GMT

Who said: "A good commie is a dead commie." and "Better dead than red." For you young people, red is the communists' favorite color to decorate with. The Communist Chinese like the color red, they especially enjoy the patterns left on the ground when they roll over people with tanks. Todd, the problem with trying to have a reasoned debate is simple, the ones posting the hyperbolic drivel are convinced they are enlightening us somehow, but I think the thousands that don't post (the ones th... [ More ]

Comment #2

Todd — Thu, 14 Feb 2008 13:07:18 GMT

You know, the one thing I would really like to see around here -- not that I think there's any chance of seeing it -- is reasoned debate free from dopiness. People who are still thinking that George Bush and Dick Cheney are plotting to install the Third Reich as our system of government are either purposely spreading crap they know isn't true, or are just plain clueless. Bush has less than a year left in office. I wonder how he's going to accomplish that, and I wonder to what purpose will i... [ More ]

Comment #1

konane — Thu, 14 Feb 2008 12:39:23 GMT

Excuse me for hogging your blog space but it's in print to back up your statement. The following is about 5% of what's on that linked page. "DOWNSIDE LEGACY AT TWO DEGREES OF PRESIDENT CLINTON SECTION: THE POLITICAL WINDS SUBSECTION: SOCIALISM Revised 1/8/01 EXCERPTS FROM NAKED COMMUNIST SOCIALIST AGENDA PROMOTED IN CONGRESS WorldNetDaily 7/22/99 J R Nyquist "â€¦ I first heard of Bill Clinton 16 years ago. Here is how it happened. I was getting a teaching credential, and one of m... [ More ]

Original Blog Entry: Hillary's Communist Agenda

Todd — Thu, 14 Feb 2008 04:58:08 GMT

I don't really have anything to say about this. I just wanted to post a headline as ridiculous as the anti-Bush propagandists who are cherry-picking left-wing hate articles from around the Internet and posting them here.