<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
  <channel>
    <title>War-Protesting Mom</title>
    <link>http://blogs.lotterypost.com/todd/2005/8/war-protesting-mom.htm</link>
    <atom:link href="http://www.lotterypost.com/rss/blogcomments/3418" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <description>Todd's Blog: War-Protesting Mom</description>
    <dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
    <generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
    <item>
      <title>Original Blog Entry: War-Protesting Mom</title>
      <link>http://blogs.lotterypost.com/todd/2005/8/war-protesting-mom.htm</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://blogs.lotterypost.com/todd/2005/8/war-protesting-mom.htm</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 14 Aug 2005 13:41:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Todd</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>I'm <strong>extremely</strong> sympathetic to any parent who loses a child in the armed forces.&nbsp; I know the protective feeling that any parent has for their children, and the gaping hole that is left in a parent's heart when their child is taken from them.</p><p>Unfortunately, I think it's finally become apparent that the war-protesting mother of soldier Casey Sheehan is no longer acting based on those feeling of loss, and is instead acting as a puppet for radical liberal factions.</p><p>There will almost certainly be people who are appalled that I would say such a thing, because to some people, to point out negative facts about any grieving parent &mdash; no matter how obvious the facts &mdash; is strictly taboo.&nbsp; Normally I would agree with that sentiment, but here we have a situation where normalcy does not apply.</p><p>This woman has crossed the line from grieving parent to political activist.&nbsp; These are not the actions of a distraught mother, but rather the motivations of an opportunist.</p><p>I have been &quot;fine&quot; with the fact that she disagrees with the president about the war.&nbsp; She has every right to have a dissenting viewpoint and to express it, especially given the fact that her child was killed in the&nbsp;very war&nbsp;that she disagrees with.</p><p>I have also been &quot;fine&quot; with the fact that she requested another meeting with the president.&nbsp; The president, of course, should not make a precedent of caving into every protester that changes their mind, as she did, but I think he's missing an opportunity to deftly turn this situation on its head by quickly meeting with her.&nbsp; After do so, he could then go in front of the nation and use that meeting to take on the liberal&nbsp;factions head-on, and once and for all shut down all their illogical arguments, through a description of facts and a dose of reality.</p><p>To me, being &quot;fine&quot; with these things means that all this woman's actions to that point seemed to remain within the bounds of true intentions and civilized behavior.</p><p>Now several new things have come to light which casts serious doubts on the woman's integrity, and illustrates that there is much more at work here than the grievings of a sorrowful parent.</p><p><strong>Web Sightings</strong></p><p>Cindy Sheehan has become the puppet of Michael Moore.&nbsp; Featured on his web site as the latest way to slam the Bush ad....</p><p>[ <a href="http://blogs.lotterypost.com/todd/2005/8/war-protesting-mom.htm">More</a> ]</p>]]></description>
      <category>* Original Blog Entry</category>
      <wfw:comment>http://www.lotterypost.com/blogentry/3418</wfw:comment>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>