<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
  <channel>
    <title>Mona Lisa a man?</title>
    <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/blogentry/37268</link>
    <atom:link href="http://www.lotterypost.com/rss/blogcomments/37268" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <description>angelm's Blog: Mona Lisa a man?</description>
    <dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
    <generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
    <item>
      <title>Original Blog Entry: Mona Lisa a man?</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/blogentry/37268</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/blogentry/37268</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 16:50:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>angelm</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Mona Lisa a man?<br />It's hardly a new theory. For years, historians have postulated that Leonardo da Vinci was really painting a self portrait when he created the Mona Lisa. Alas, like most tantalizing theories, there was little proof to back it up. Until now. A group of scientists are seeking permission to dig up the remains of Mr. da Vinci &quot;to conduct carbon and DNA testing.&quot; According to a very popular article from Yahoo! News, the scientists believe that if the skull in intact, they could, in theory, compare it to the face of the Mona Lisa, by creating &quot;a virtual and then physical reconstruction of Leonardo's face.&quot; If the skull has disintegrated, the scientists may have to move on to something a bit less glamorous, like determining if the original Lassie really posed for &quot;Dogs Playing Poker.&quot;</p>]]></description>
      <category>* Original Blog Entry</category>
      <wfw:comment>http://www.lotterypost.com/blogentry/37268</wfw:comment>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
