<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
  <channel>
    <title>"Why Isn't Socialism Dead?</title>
    <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/blogentry/8100</link>
    <atom:link href="http://www.lotterypost.com/rss/blogcomments/8100" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <description>konane's Blog: "Why Isn't Socialism Dead?</description>
    <dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
    <generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
    <item>
      <title>Original Blog Entry: "Why Isn't Socialism Dead?</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/blogentry/8100</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/blogentry/8100</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 May 2006 23:21:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>konane</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><strong>&quot;Why&nbsp;<em>Isn't</em> Socialism Dead?</strong></p><p>By Lee Harris</p><p>Source Tech Central Station Daily&nbsp;</p><p>&quot;The President of Bolivia, Evo Morales, celebrated May Day by ordering soldiers to occupy his country's natural gas fields. The purpose of this exercise was not military, but economic: Morales has demanded that all foreign companies currently operating these fields must sign a contract with Bolivia that would allow them to retain only 18% of the production, while the remainder would go to Bolivia's state-owned oil company. The 18% concession to the foreign companies was not an act of generosity on the part of Morales, but simply of expediency: Bolivia needs these companies to tap its natural gas resources, because it is unable, at least at present, to operate the natural gas fields on its own.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Morales, a fiery populist who was elected in a landslide, is clearly seen as following in the footsteps of Venezuela's own firebrand populist President Hugo Chavez. Furthermore, only last week, Morales and Chavez met with Fidel Castro, enacting a kind of socialist love-fest that issued in a partnership agreement aimed at creating a web of economic alliances in South America that would resist the insidious lure of American-style free trade -- its ultimate aim would be economic autarky for the region, free from foreign control.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>In addition to sending in the troops, Morales is also sending forth a good bit of inflammatory rhetoric. He refers to the foreign companies operating Bolivia's natural resources as having &quot;looted&quot; them, and his decision to send in troops on the traditional socialist holiday, May the First, was clearly not a coincidence. In a similar vein, Morales' mentor, Hugo Chavez, has also been preaching that to be rich is to be wicked, while to be poor is to be virtuous -- and though he may be quoting scripture to support his arguments, there can be no serious question that Chavez-style populism is simply socialism with a South American accent.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>And this leads to the question I want to address, namely, Why isn't socialism dead?</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>The Peruvian economist, Hernando de Soto, has argued in his book, <em><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0465016146/102-4902961-6901734?v=glance&amp;n=283155" rel="external"><span style="color: #0000ff">The Mystery of Capital</span></a></em>, that the failure of the various socialist experiments of th....</p><p>[ <a href="http://www.lotterypost.com/blogentry/8100">More</a> ]</p>]]></description>
      <category>* Original Blog Entry</category>
      <wfw:comment>http://www.lotterypost.com/blogentry/8100</wfw:comment>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
