<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
  <channel>
    <title>Ohio Lottery stands by change of vendors</title>
    <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/news/176604</link>
    <atom:link href="http://www.lotterypost.com/rss/news/176604" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <description>Lottery Post News Story: Ohio Lottery stands by change of vendors</description>
    <dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
    <generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
    <item>
      <title>Ohio Lottery stands by change of vendors</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/news/176604</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/news/176604</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 17:34:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Todd</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[The Ohio Lottery is staying with its decision to go with a new vendor despite complaints from the company it has been doing business with for more than two decades.<br /><br />In a letter Friday to GTECH Corp., Ohio Lottery Director Michael Dolan rebuffed the company's claims that the lottery botched the bidding process when it awarded a lucrative contract to competitor Intralot Inc<br /><br />The contract, which would begin July 1, 2009, is estimated to be worth about $170 million and could last up to 10 years... [&nbsp;<a href="http://www.lotterypost.com/news/176604">More</a>&nbsp;]]]></description>
      <category>* Original News Story</category>
      <wfw:comment>http://www.lotterypost.com/reply-topic.aspx?td=1053792</wfw:comment>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>