<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
  <channel>
    <title>Lottery partnerships have poor track record</title>
    <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/news/73181</link>
    <atom:link href="http://www.lotterypost.com/rss/news/73181" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <description>Lottery Post News Story: Lottery partnerships have poor track record</description>
    <dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
    <generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
    <item>
      <title>Lottery partnerships have poor track record</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/news/73181</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/news/73181</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2003 07:58:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Todd</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[As Tennessee officials consider a lottery partnership with Georgia, lottery observers warn that similar joint ventures have had their problems. Tensions simmer within a consortium of western Canadian provinces operating a lottery together. Three New England states are starting to go their separate ways. And South Carolina took only a few days before turning down Georgia's offer to join forces.``Some liaisons are not what they're cracked up to be,'' Edward Stanek of Iowa, the country's longest-se... [&nbsp;<a href="http://www.lotterypost.com/news/73181">More</a>&nbsp;]]]></description>
      <category>* Original News Story</category>
      <wfw:comment>http://www.lotterypost.com/reply-topic.aspx?td=128581</wfw:comment>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
