POLL 3 of 3: Switching to mechanical ball drawings

Reply #17

Guest — Tue, 30 Oct 2007 14:52:42 GMT

While I'm against computerized drawings,I'd still spend my buck per drawing because its the only game in town.

Reply #16

psykomo — Fri, 19 Oct 2007 00:26:24 GMT

LP>>>>>>>>>>>>member's

if YOU can't<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< VOTE on this WON!!

would U please send >>(LOTTERY POST)

DONATIONon this WON$$$

($1.00>$2.00>$3.00)????????............MIGHT BE APPRECIATED !!!!!!!!!!!!

otherwise:>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Vote in a LP >>POLE!!!..(more to GAIN than LOSE<<<

Reply #15

psykomo — Wed, 10 Oct 2007 22:06:04 GMT

For sum strange.....>>>>>>reason..........PSYKO missed this<<<

POLL ..................however, voted YES on this WON^^^^^^^

too:

$PEND>>>>MORE!

Note:

If you reverse engineer this POLL<<<<
(let's thank LP onthis WON #1....+++++++++++)

thanks Lottery Post

Reply #14

Just6ntlc — Tue, 18 Sep 2007 21:52:52 GMT
I don't like to play any game that is computerized.

Reply #13

L J1 — Sun, 02 Sep 2007 19:30:14 GMT
I voted to spend more. In my opinion, the fact is that mechanical is constent, unless the balls and or machine are in perfect condition in operation, everything will do it's job. People will win more, and systems will work too.

Computerized!!.... hmmmm..... just like Algebra... many variables, depending on what team of programming wizards are behind the curtain. People will win less, past systems will work less (maybe, that's a big if) and I agree with a former post from Jim, ( the s... [ More ]

Reply #12

Rocket 455 — Fri, 31 Aug 2007 03:47:58 GMT
Actually when a lottery payoff hits a certain amount hordes of people flock to the register to buy their chance. It never ceases to amaze me. As if a million dollars is just not enough to wage a dollar on. lol... The sudden death dude is speaking of is that moment when everyone and their brother is buying up tickets, insuring a win for somebody. That's just my take. I'm often wrong.

Reply #11

LOTTOMIKE — Thu, 30 Aug 2007 22:28:11 GMT
LOL, doubledown i think he meant his brain.

Reply #10

DoubleDown — Thu, 30 Aug 2007 21:49:38 GMT
What, pray tell, is sudden death in the lottery

Reply #9

Just6ntlc — Thu, 30 Aug 2007 18:11:13 GMT
No change is my vote. I usually buy more when it reaches sudden death.

Reply #8

scorpio — Tue, 28 Aug 2007 22:53:39 GMT
i want what missouri and pennsylvania have,as they hit 5-0 most of the draws

Reply #7

LOTTOMIKE — Tue, 28 Aug 2007 19:30:35 GMT
i would spend more.i don't play lotto 5 anymore and i cut back on my cash 4 tickets since tennessee made their 'mistake'.

Reply #6

jim695 — Tue, 28 Aug 2007 18:00:59 GMT
If Indiana's legislature suffered an attack collective integrity and ordered the Hoosier Lottery to revert to real lottery drawings, I would begin playing again, provided the drawings were broadcast on live television across the ENTIRE state. If they failed to take this step, I would continue to avoid their games.

Reply #5

Guru101 — Tue, 28 Aug 2007 17:16:05 GMT
I would spend the same.

Reply #4

phaseven — Tue, 28 Aug 2007 16:31:51 GMT
9/11

Reply #3

spy153 — Tue, 28 Aug 2007 16:27:24 GMT

Reply #2

phaseven — Tue, 28 Aug 2007 16:06:18 GMT
about time u think

Reply #1

ducksafloat — Tue, 28 Aug 2007 15:07:45 GMT
switchin' to the computer drws, has changed the way i play, thought MO was unfair already and because i guess i'm more of a ball drw type and computers r so amazin' i think that they can be made to do N E thing.

POLL 3 of 3: Switching to mechanical ball drawings

Todd — Tue, 28 Aug 2007 14:22:29 GMT
Assuming your state uses computerized drawings currently, would your spending habits change if your state changed to mechanical ball drawings?

Please indicate what effect the change from computerized drawings to ball drawings would have by choosing one of the three poll choices above.

Also, please participate in the other two polls posted.

POLL 1 of 3: Computerized drawings vs. ball drawings

http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/161745

POLL 2 of 3: Switching to computerized drawings

ht... [ More ]