<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
  <channel>
    <title>How do I prove my state lottery's CGNs are fixed?</title>
    <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260</link>
    <atom:link href="http://www.lotterypost.com/rss/topic/167260" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <description>Lottery Post Forum Topic: How do I prove my state lottery's CGNs are fixed?</description>
    <dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
    <generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #125</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1167489</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1167489</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 05:08:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>JADELottery</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[I haven't forgot about ya. I'm working out a display format for both the PDF's at my webspace and here at the Lottery Post.]]></description>
      <category>JADELottery</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #124</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1165956</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1165956</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 02:47:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>pick4hawk</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[Interesting graph --so how exactly are the equations related to the graph. are you trying to relate that greater the probablity density then choose in that area?<br /><br />How do the equations differ from normal distribution?<br /><br />there's log normal distribution ect.<br /><br />There are many forms of distribution.Please define your terms.<br /><br />I'd still perfer pdfs of your posts containing explainations.<br /><br />In what book or books --are you using for reference material?<br /><br />Thank - you]]></description>
      <category>pick4hawk</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #123</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1165390</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1165390</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 07:26:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>JADELottery</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[ah, got ya. i'll try to keep it as simple as possible. however, i do like to give out the information for those that would like it. don't worry about the math stuff, just look over the whole thing to get a feel for what is being talked about. i'll present it in both ways if possible, so everyone can be in on it.]]></description>
      <category>JADELottery</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #122</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1165381</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1165381</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 06:32:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Guru101</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[Those symbols in those equations.]]></description>
      <category>Guru101</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #121</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1165253</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1165253</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 02:30:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>JADELottery</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[Can you explain a little more?<br /><br />Are the pictures not showing or is it something else]]></description>
      <category>JADELottery</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #120</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1165195</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1165195</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 01:33:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>JADELottery</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[In the previous example, the color of the Quantum Points is a Gray Gradient from Light to Dark. The Darker the Quantum Point the more Probable you would likely find an actual data point. This is ok, but it doesn't clearly define what more probable than other areas of the graph. This is where a Color Gradient comes in. It helps with showing the more probable areas without taking away from the whole Quantum Point Graph. The following picture show how to read the graph's Color Gradient.<br /><br />The]]></description>
      <category>JADELottery</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #119</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1165189</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1165189</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 01:30:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Guru101</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[JadeLottery, I wish I could read that stuff you're posting.]]></description>
      <category>Guru101</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #118</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1165165</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1165165</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 00:53:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>JADELottery</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[Quantum Points have the advantage of showing patterns that might not be easily seen when looking at raw Classic Points. The following animated graph shows the differences by displaying the Classic data points, then overlaying the Quantum data points and then just the Quantum data points. You can see from the animation that it's easier to see where the data tends to be more in the Quantum data point example. You can also see at certain places along the X axis the data is deficient for a period ne... [&nbsp;<a href="http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1165165">More</a>&nbsp;]]]></description>
      <category>JADELottery</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #117</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1165050</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1165050</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 22:03:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>JADELottery</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[Quantum Gaussian Points are slightly different, but the goal is still the same as Classical Cartesian Points. Quantum Gaussian Points work similar in that they give us a generalized concept of where the invisible, dimensionless point is. However, instead of having a ridged defined circle the Quantum Gaussian Point is more like a fuzzy dot with no apparent edge to the circle. Below show the difference between a magnified Classical Cartesian Point and a Quantum Gaussian Point.<br /><br />Classical C... [&nbsp;<a href="http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1165050">More</a>&nbsp;]]]></description>
      <category>JADELottery</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #116</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1165018</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1165018</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 21:04:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>JADELottery</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[Ok, now that I have some time, we can talk about the difference between Classical Cartesian Points and Quantum Gaussian Points. Classical Cartesian Points are the points drawn on a graph that show the abstract concept of points. Actual points are dimensionless; they have absolutely no size at all. In order for us to visualize the abstract and invisible, a small dot of some specific size is approximately placed on a graph to show the ideal, the concept, the representation of that point. By compar... [&nbsp;<a href="http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1165018">More</a>&nbsp;]]]></description>
      <category>JADELottery</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #115</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1157854</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1157854</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 15:03:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>JADELottery</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
      <category>JADELottery</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #114</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1157736</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1157736</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 06:24:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>JADELottery</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[Great, it worked]]></description>
      <category>JADELottery</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #113</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1157733</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1157733</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 06:22:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>JADELottery</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[Another test... just a test... think this will work...]]></description>
      <category>JADELottery</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #112</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1157302</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1157302</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 18:31:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>JADELottery</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[Thank you for the feedback dougplayer and fastrak.<br /><br />I'd like to redirect for a moment on the difference between this topic and a common misperception about this being a post of the lottery's sneaky way of increasing the bottom line. We know that even without some kind of number manipulation the lottery is going to make money. So, that's not the issue. Also, with number manipulation there may be some added increase to revenue. However, that would be in this case, just a side effect of the true]]></description>
      <category>JADELottery</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #111</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1153848</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1153848</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 12:46:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>fastrak</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[Like the boys in Vegas would say you're trying to make your point the hard way. This is so simple.<br /><br />The state lotteries that use computers for their million dollar jackpots don't have disclosure. Gee I wonder why?<br /><br />When the lottery commissions start giving out public information of The who? The where purchased? and what type of ticket won? i.e. Quick Pick Ticket or was it a written in slip with personal numbers I'll think otherwise.<br /><br />The small 2, 5, 10. 100, 150 dollar tickets.... we don't... [&nbsp;<a href="http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1153848">More</a>&nbsp;]]]></description>
      <category>fastrak</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #110</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1141714</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1141714</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 23:08:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>dougplayer</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[nice post jade. Iam new to this site. But a long time lottery player. I have been waiting for some one with math skills to show how numbers can have more meaning than just random picking.<br /><br />For those who think state lotterys are fixed. Think again. They are makeing around $400 million a year from there lotterys. They take there cut out before paying off on the Big games. As for the daily 3 and 4 games. They can take pay off hits and still make millions. THEY DONT HAVE TO CHEAT. It is a money ma... [&nbsp;<a href="http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1141714">More</a>&nbsp;]]]></description>
      <category>dougplayer</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #109</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1139248</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1139248</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 21:40:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>JADELottery</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[Before we can release any additional information. We'll have to discuss the difference between Classical Cartesian Points and Quantum Gaussian Points. We are working on presenting this in the most simple way possible without getting too technical for everyone.]]></description>
      <category>JADELottery</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #108</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1129173</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1129173</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 03:45:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>JADELottery</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[I'm in the middle of a cyberspace move in addition to my move to Minnesota. Check my posts in the topic ' JADE's Pick 3 Pick 4 Selector Now Available ' and my Blog.]]></description>
      <category>JADELottery</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #107</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1125686</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1125686</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 14:42:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Stew12</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[You must be a platinum member to view abbreviated wheels. Sign up and receive all kinds of bonus's, and access to hundreds of wheels]]></description>
      <category>Stew12</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #106</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1125570</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1125570</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 09:55:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>atapi</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[can anyone help me with this wheel abbrev 4 if 6 of 20=66<br /><br />please.]]></description>
      <category>atapi</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #105</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1125030</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1125030</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 12:17:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>JADELottery</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[The 1 year anniversary is on 10-04. If all goes well with work and other home related items, I hope to fill in the blanks.]]></description>
      <category>JADELottery</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #104</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1118328</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1118328</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 15:02:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>JADELottery</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[We are coming up on one year since the start of Experiment 1 in October. The data we have collected is very revealing in addition to other observations.]]></description>
      <category>JADELottery</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #103</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1108601</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1108601</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 22:09:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>JADELottery</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[a few more prediction posts and we can add some withheld info.]]></description>
      <category>JADELottery</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #102</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1101169</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1101169</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 14:05:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>JADELottery</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[pick3hawk,<br /><br />you are in the correct general area, however, there is some additional infomation that has not been posted here that will explain a lot more. I'm currently in traveling mode for work and I'll be on the road bouncing between home and Minnesota these coming weeks. Also, the additional information is still in a test and is producing some interesting results. I'll update as soon as work related matters calm down.]]></description>
      <category>JADELottery</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #101</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1100743</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1100743</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 19:09:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>pick4hawk</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[Or are you talking about changing the distribution to normal distribution by:<br /><br />like:<br /><br />10 v1 =2 *rnd -1<br /><br />v2 =2*rnd -1<br /><br />r= v1^2+v2^2<br /><br />if (r =1) then goto 10<br /><br />fac =sqr(-2*log(r)/r)<br /><br />gauss =v2*fac]]></description>
      <category>pick4hawk</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #100</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1100731</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1100731</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 18:44:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>pick4hawk</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[Current applications of Gaussain Probability Density are encouraging. This will expand into other<br /><br />representations of available data.<br /><br />I know the f(x): 1/ sqr(2*pi o^2) Exp(1) ^- abs(((x-u)^2)/(2*o^2))<br /><br />How are you applying it???<br /><br />For normal distribution RNG??<br /><br />Upon what types of sets]]></description>
      <category>pick4hawk</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #99</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1091289</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1091289</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 09:38:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>CurtisC</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[Thank you for your work.]]></description>
      <category>CurtisC</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #98</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1090263</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1090263</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 02:20:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>JADELottery</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[My ATT DSL outage has interfered with the last three Badger 5 postings. I'll have to post a weeks worth Badger 5 combos, while limping along with dialup, and hope ATT gets its MFS togther.]]></description>
      <category>JADELottery</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #97</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1075241</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1075241</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 16:39:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>JADELottery</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[That was explained on Post 1, Pretext section, Paragraph 5, Sentence 1. Read carefully the first post and quite possibly several times to fully understand this posted topic.]]></description>
      <category>JADELottery</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #96</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1074072</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1074072</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 22:41:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Atomic Dog</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[Ok ..... after 3 months of trying to read through this post (sorry ... I'm dyslexic), I am still trying to take this all in and see where it leads.<br /><br />My simple question for you, and I'm assuming others are curious as well, is what state lotteries and state lottery games are fixed and which ones aren't? Plain and simple ... please help us out!<br /><br />Thanks,<br /><br />John]]></description>
      <category>Atomic Dog</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #95</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1074052</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1074052</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 21:42:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>JADELottery</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[Current applications of Gaussain Probability Density are encouraging. This will expand into other representations of available data.]]></description>
      <category>JADELottery</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #94</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1061125</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1061125</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 22:42:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Stack47</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[The Badger 5 game is 5/31 with 169,911 combinations that is drawn everyday using a RNG. If the drawing is truly random, matching the winning combo out of 10 would be a lucky guess. The side of effect of knowing how the game is rigged is that you would know one of your 10 combos would be drawn. Something that should happen in about 60% of the drawing but happens in 80% of the time is a bias but you never said how long your testing period was. Is that from all the draws or some of the drawings]]></description>
      <category>Stack47</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #93</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1061002</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1061002</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 19:35:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>JADELottery</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[I'd like to redirect everyone. I have read the replies and there are good points in either pro or con. However, the original heading of the topic is 'How do I prove my state lottery's CGN is fix?' As of now, there is some indication that something is going a skew, but not the real 'gotcha betch!' moment; that's yet to come.<br /><br />This was broken up into three different experiments, labeled Experiment 0, Experiment 1 and Experiment 2. Each follows on the other; Experiment 0 is the control setup for]]></description>
      <category>JADELottery</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #92</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1060646</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1060646</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 05:00:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>pumpi76</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[There are over 146 million possible Powerball combination; how many drawings would you have to simulate before you even start to determine what should or should not happen?<br /><br />People been saying this for years that there is 150 million combination...There is actually 3 million combinations if you count the 5 white balls..And those 3 millions are MULTIPLIED by the bonus ball meaning that they repeat 42 times...I notice that 80% of the bonus ball for Powerball is bellow 30 and above 5...So if you... [&nbsp;<a href="http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1060646">More</a>&nbsp;]]]></description>
      <category>pumpi76</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #91</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1060335</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1060335</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 23:25:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Stack47</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[Thorpe didn't use a computer to play blackjack; he used one to simulate thousands of blackjack hands from a single deck and analyzed the results. At that time, casinos use one deck and some dealt out all the cards, shuffled the discards and kept on dealing. He knew it was possible to track the discards and know which cards remained in the deck and used the data from the simulated hands find out if it could be an advantage to the player.<br /><br />It's called card counting and variations of it are still... [&nbsp;<a href="http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1060335">More</a>&nbsp;]]]></description>
      <category>Stack47</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #90</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1060307</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1060307</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 23:03:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>time*treat</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[The various filters ( AABBCC , odd/even ratios, etc) are much like elements on the periodic table, they need to be combined with each other to get full use of them.<br /><br />The limits of what can and cannot be simulated on a modern computer are mostly determined by what is between the keyboard and the chair.]]></description>
      <category>time*treat</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #89</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1059639</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1059639</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 02:16:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>pumpi76</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[you can't use a supercomputer for blackjack or casino games or horse betting...YOu can only use a supercomputer for the lottery and the stock market...<br /><br />they watch too much star trek and tv...<br /><br />and the supercomputers they got know are nothing compare to what they had in 1985, 1975, 1965 or 1955...even though a supercomputer of 1985 could be helpful...<br /><br />i said this several times before...]]></description>
      <category>pumpi76</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #88</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1058861</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1058861</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 00:24:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Stack47</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[If you also see four 5's and multiples of it and by that i mean if you see 5, 15, 20, 30, and then a number, and if you see this appear 2 times in less than 3 months, then your game is rigged..<br /><br />Excluding the power ball, there are 14,520 combinations with 4 numbers with multiples of 5 and you could expect to see it happen once out of every 250 drawings. I did a quick look back to January 2006 and couldn't find where that happened once so maybe it's due. And since it should average two hits in... [&nbsp;<a href="http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1058861">More</a>&nbsp;]]]></description>
      <category>Stack47</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #87</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1057644</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1057644</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 17:04:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>pumpi76</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[How you prove is rigged? whenever you see in Powerball combinations that have four 6's, or four 3's, or four 2's or four 8's , etc, etc twice in less than 1 month...What do I mean? if you see the combination 6, 16, 26, 36 42 (with four 6's on it) and if you see such a combination play twice in 1 month or 2 months or 3 months, then your game is rigged....<br /><br />If you also see four 5's and multiples of it and by that i mean if you see 5, 15, 20, 30, and then a number, and if you see this appear 2 ti... [&nbsp;<a href="http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1057644">More</a>&nbsp;]]]></description>
      <category>pumpi76</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #86</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1057084</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1057084</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 22:00:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>RJOh</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[I tried tracking games with better odds than PowerBall using that AABBCC system and while the odds were improved 200% the payouts amounts eliminated any advantage gained.<br /><br />For example I played the Ohio Classic Lotto which has overall odds of 1:54 of winning a prize (the smallest and most likely being $2). The odds of matching 3 for $2 is 1:57 and I've regularly matched three 1-2 times with 20 lines which wins $2-$4. To make any money or break even I would need to match 4 for $70 more often an... [&nbsp;<a href="http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1057084">More</a>&nbsp;]]]></description>
      <category>RJOh</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #85</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1056458</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1056458</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 02:30:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>lottobrain</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[I use lottery software to print out basic charts to aid me in making my own paper and pencil charts that I use to see various trends in the number patterns. I am usually looking for patterns in the way the numbers come so that I can try to pick my numbers to play along these patterns. I also made up a chart to track Powerball with the AAABC , etc. type of pattern that you had discussed in another post. I break this pattern up based on the last 20 draws in powerball. Any numbers that hit in the l... [&nbsp;<a href="http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1056458">More</a>&nbsp;]]]></description>
      <category>lottobrain</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #84</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1056373</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1056373</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 00:47:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>RJOh</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[Lottobrain, I've read post about the charts in GH software by members who used her stuff but non so far have said they actually used them to pick a winners.]]></description>
      <category>RJOh</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #83</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1054930</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1054930</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 02:08:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>lottobrain</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[RJOH - In a past post......I think it was in a discussion about position play....I mentioned that 4 of the winning Powerball numbers would come out of the first position or first column perhaps every 5 to 8 draws. Once all 5 came out of the first position in just the last 12 draws. You are right about the last 20 draws having 4 or 5 of the winning numbers much of the time, at least in Powerball. I use Gail Howard's software to print out chart B, a chart that prints out 40 or 50 of the last draws... [&nbsp;<a href="http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1054930">More</a>&nbsp;]]]></description>
      <category>lottobrain</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #82</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1054896</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1054896</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 01:16:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>RJOh</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[What are these repeating patterns that you have identified and how did you find them? I've been trying to come with a way to identify patterns and classify them so I might use them to pick combinations for future games. Winning combinations in most games have numbers that have hit in the previous 20 drawings or less. If they are more likely to also have a pattern, it's possible that they may be covered with less than 50% of the number pool which would give a huge advantage to any players with th... [&nbsp;<a href="http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1054896">More</a>&nbsp;]]]></description>
      <category>RJOh</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #81</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1054860</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1054860</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 00:44:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>MysteryMan424</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[I don't think the Wisconson Badger game is rigged, I just think there's a lot of repeating patterns. Besides who benefits from the rigging? Lotteries don't have to rig thier games since they clearly have the advantage. Also one can use the repeating patterns to ones advantage no]]></description>
      <category>MysteryMan424</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #80</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1054823</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1054823</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 23:51:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>JADELottery</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[irmediator, KebRyo and Stack47,<br /><br />I'll get back to ya's later. I've got a lot going on now: son's recent graduation, an up and coming career advancement with my current employer, prepping my home for a possible sale and additional programming issues as it relates to this topic, other topics and JADE LSG 2.0.]]></description>
      <category>JADELottery</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #79</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1040952</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1040952</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 00:54:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Stack47</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[Badger 5 is a 5/31 game that uses a RNG and I believe the affects of trying to prove the game is fixed is to find a group of 12 numbers that consistently has 4 or 5 of the drawn numbers. Finding a flaw in a RNG could benefit players.<br /><br />Get all lotto game stats (games with Balls over 50 played) and show them side by side to see if the random and 50/50 is working or is there a odd game out there that is producing a unique set of numbers and patterns.<br /><br />The Tennessee Lottery had some unique pat... [&nbsp;<a href="http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1040952">More</a>&nbsp;]]]></description>
      <category>Stack47</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #78</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1040782</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1040782</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 21:36:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Stack47</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[I've followed this discussing since it began back in December and never though the object was to prove the Wisconsin lottery is cheating. That would be more like knowing which batch of scratch-off tickets had the jackpot winner, placing those tickets in an area or in a specific store, or not offering them for sale until they made their expected profit. It's possible they could scan the played combinations in pick-5 or lotto games and program the RNG to exclude them or only include the combinatio... [&nbsp;<a href="http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1040782">More</a>&nbsp;]]]></description>
      <category>Stack47</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #77</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1040565</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1040565</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 16:58:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>KebRyo</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[Hello, I'm new here but this grabbed my attention, I would like to add more Data here...no I would like More data.<br /><br />While you are clearly on a mathematical track to a target using the probability system with what would happen IF. If you are trying to say A lotto is rigged you would be in fact saying some one rigged it, without all the data I would hope that a few things would be considered:<br /><br />Ball weight: ball 1 can not weigh the same as ball 50, ink over area proves that.<br /><br />Base Ball weight... [&nbsp;<a href="http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1040565">More</a>&nbsp;]]]></description>
      <category>KebRyo</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #76</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1034764</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1034764</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 20:22:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>irmediator</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[Dear benmas:<br /><br />Option 4) play and win! :) The patterns in the numbers repeat themselves too often to be ignored. Tell you what... hand input the results of just one game of your choice from 5 years past into an excel sheet. What you will see are inexplicable patterns in the numbers. Clusters of the same numbers and pairs repeating themselves within short time spans. Even the most casual observer will come to the same conclusion, that statistically this shouldn't be happening. Therefore, ob... [&nbsp;<a href="http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1034764">More</a>&nbsp;]]]></description>
      <category>irmediator</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #75</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1034717</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1034717</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 19:24:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>JADELottery</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[irmediator and benmas,<br /><br />thanks for the feedback; i do appreciate your comments. however, i'm working over a surprising discovery right now. just keep a look out for something amazing to come up.]]></description>
      <category>JADELottery</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #74</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1034226</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1034226</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 02:00:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>benmas</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[OK, lets say he is right and somehow proved that is not random but manipulated....So next what do you do...I see only three options left for a player after these findings:<br /><br />1) Not play this game anymore<br /><br />2) Not play all the Wisconsion RNG games anymore<br /><br />3) Write to lottery or newspapers and tell them to switch to balls ( this will in all likeliness be largely ignored as well as your claims that they are manipulating the games)<br /><br />In my opinion if you have reason to beleive that something i... [&nbsp;<a href="http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1034226">More</a>&nbsp;]]]></description>
      <category>benmas</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #73</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1034216</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1034216</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 01:35:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>irmediator</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[To be brief:<br /><br />Jade is right.... it can't be random.]]></description>
      <category>irmediator</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #72</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1029901</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1029901</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 20:56:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>JADELottery</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[Update: I'm chugging along here with this Badger 5 data, however, I'm working several other projects at the same time and in the same subject matter. There's a possible topic morph in the works as it relates to this one.]]></description>
      <category>JADELottery</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #71</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1024969</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1024969</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 07:18:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>JADELottery</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[teuffelhund37,<br /><br />thank you for the input. this is just a small piece of a much larger project i've been working on in my spare time. i'm always thinking about something math, physics or programming related, even if it has nothing to do with the lottery. however, in piecing things together i noticed a lot of similarities in various studies that appeared to fit together. they worked amazingly well in describing other points of view in seemingly unrelated topics.<br /><br />as i said, this is just a small... [&nbsp;<a href="http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1024969">More</a>&nbsp;]]]></description>
      <category>JADELottery</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #70</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1024163</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1024163</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 18:43:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>teuffelhund37</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[I am of the opposite opinion as this poster. I say- Jade- keep on keepin' on! As I said in another post, just because a goal seems tough, doesn't mean it isn't worth pursuing. We all know that lottery and casino officials have the best mathmaticians in the world working for them. IF JADE can prove something to them that they haven't previously thought of, I guarantee they will rethink the process.<br /><br />Jade- keep dreamin' man and don't listen to what the naysayers on here say. I am sure some, espe... [&nbsp;<a href="http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1024163">More</a>&nbsp;]]]></description>
      <category>teuffelhund37</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #69</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1024158</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1024158</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 18:32:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>teuffelhund37</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[WOW! I checked out your math and I think that you have a tough task. However, just because a task is tough doesn't mean it isn't worth trying to pursue. I have seem lottery wheels, software, etc and I can tell you one thing, THOSE THINGS ARE BUNK! Not because I haven't HIT yet, but because they suppose there is some way to bring order to a totally random event.<br /><br />I can not find any information that says (save 1) that any of these system creators are actually, provable winners themselves. It is]]></description>
      <category>teuffelhund37</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #68</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1023299</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1023299</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 07:09:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>JADELottery</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[Below is the total run down of what we have so far.<br /><br />Data Stream Chrono Badger 5 Draw Wheel, Matched Draw #'s, Line Match Distribution Scramble Order (Implemented 2008-03-04)<br /><br />Index 0 Index 1 Posted Year Month Day A B C D E W M 0 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13<br /><br />1 1 Yes 2007 12 4 2 4 11 15 22 0 3 12 23 11 4<br /><br />2 2 Yes 2007 12 5 1 2 9 20 29 0 1 31 19<br /><br />3 3 Yes 2007 12 6 4 12 14 16 20 0 4 6 18 20 4 2<br /><br />4 4 Yes 2007 12 7 1 12 13 15 18 0 4 3 22 20 5<br /><br />5 5 Yes 2007 12 8]]></description>
      <category>JADELottery</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #67</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1022358</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1022358</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 21:21:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>JADELottery</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[In reference to the Ohio 023, is that midday, evening or both]]></description>
      <category>JADELottery</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #66</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1022295</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1022295</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 18:53:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>JADELottery</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[I'm working on making fraud detection a part of JADE LSG 2.0. That way anyone can number crunch themselves. This is just a test run of a few detection methods.]]></description>
      <category>JADELottery</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #65</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1022291</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1022291</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 18:36:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>dewaa</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[Jadelottery's number crunching is well over my head. Sladgemooto's post makes it very obvious that Wisconsin had maybe has a big problem.<br /><br />But to prove the game is fixed I think you should crunch the numbers on other games as well. The larger the pool of numbers the greater the variation from what we might consider random will be in a relative short time span.As an example, chart. the first digit in either a pick three or four game.The odds tell you any given number should come up an average o... [&nbsp;<a href="http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1022291">More</a>&nbsp;]]]></description>
      <category>dewaa</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #64</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1020218</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1020218</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 06:00:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>JADELottery</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[We're approaching draw 200 for Exp. 1 and Exp. 2. We'll add more data and fill in some additional information sometime after.]]></description>
      <category>JADELottery</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #63</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1011531</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1011531</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 06:40:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>JADELottery</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[Site updates are interfering with the auto posting of the Badger 5 wheel on a tight random schedule of 19:54 to 19:58 daily. I've reprogrammed the auto posting to an expanded random selection time frame of 00:00 to 19:58 daily to increase the probability of auto posting the Badger 5 wheel when LP site updates are being done.]]></description>
      <category>JADELottery</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #62</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1007483</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1007483</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 15:55:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>JADELottery</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[Ok, now that most of you have viewed the graph animation, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VfYxlTZYE8c, of just one of the anomalies that have plagued the Badger 5 drawings since 2007-10-05. I'd like to address some other issues that have arisen during this topic. There is a misperception being injected into the mindset of those who are reading this. The misperception is that my objective in this post and others is to bring down my state lottery. That is not correct; at no point during this topic]]></description>
      <category>JADELottery</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #61</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1004524</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1004524</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 21:36:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>JADELottery</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[Sledgemoto,<br /><br />Thanks, I try to make this as easy to understand as possible. However, some of the number crunching can get a bit wielding at times. I find that graphs help a lot when trying to talk about an abstract number analysis and animated graphs help out even more. It's as close to laymen as I can get without loosing much of the fundamental concept of the analysis, method or idea.<br /><br />Yeah, there are many unreasonable occurrences during the entire span of this computer generated number sche... [&nbsp;<a href="http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1004524">More</a>&nbsp;]]]></description>
      <category>JADELottery</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #60</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1004335</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1004335</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 15:51:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Sledgemoto</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[Bravo JadeLottery,<br /><br />I've been watching your progress on this in the background for quite some time. I am a player and do monitor the badger5 on a daily basis. While I will admit I'm not a wheel player and most of your analysis is way beyond my comprehension I have been very intrigued by it.<br /><br />I to have noticed many things that seem out of the norm from your traditional ball lotteries. It was very obvious to me that there have been adjustments made during the life of badger5 especially at the... [&nbsp;<a href="http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1004335">More</a>&nbsp;]]]></description>
      <category>Sledgemoto</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #59</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1004171</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1004171</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 06:30:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>JADELottery</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[Boy I tell ya.<br /><br />If there are any people in Wisconsin monitoring and playing the Badger 5, there is some major anomaly galore going on here.<br /><br />I won't say too much here, but dee-amn.<br /><br />Tell ya what, how about we out Flank 'em?<br /><br />While I'm distracting them, team up, a few of you go Left and some go Right, then radio when you're in position.<br /><br />I'll set of the flash bang distracter system.<br /><br />Right you lob a few smoke grenade diffusion systems at 'em.<br /><br />Left you rush in full fire attack syste... [&nbsp;<a href="http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1004171">More</a>&nbsp;]]]></description>
      <category>JADELottery</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #58</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1002446</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1002446</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 07:10:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>JADELottery</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[Sorry, posted a program test sheet by mistake.<br /><br />Here's the actual update from my post earlier this week.<br /><br />Data Stream Chrono Badger 5 Draw Wheel, Matched Draw #'s, Line Match Distribution Scrable Order<br /><br />(Implemented 2008-03-04)<br /><br />Index 0 Index 1 Posted Year Month Day A B C D E W M 0 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13<br /><br />95 91 Yes 2008 3 7 1 4 9 12 13 0 2 16 30 4          20 15 10 14 22 13 19 12 17 11 18 16 21<br /><br />96 92 Yes 2008 3 8 1 10 14 18 21 0 4 3 25 14 8]]></description>
      <category>JADELottery</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #57</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1001528</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1001528</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 19:12:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>JADELottery</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[State ignore me? I'm counting on it.<br /><br />Never prove anything? Well, as long as I prove it to myself, that's all I need.<br /><br />This information is posted for your benefit.<br /><br />You can use it any way you'd like or not at all.<br /><br />I'll let you decide.]]></description>
      <category>JADELottery</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #56</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1001526</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1001526</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 19:05:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>benmas</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[JAde, i respect your knowledge in mathematics and computer programming but in my opinion you are going overboard with this thing....most likely you will never prove anything, even if you come close the state will still ignore you...everyone aknowledged that there was a problem in tennesse and they didnt do anything about the situaton so....on the other hand if you are trying so hard to figure a statistical way to win just keep it simple ...]]></description>
      <category>benmas</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #55</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1001523</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1001523</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 19:02:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>JADELottery</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[If the link for the graph animation doesn't work, try this --&gt; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VfYxlTZYE8c]]></description>
      <category>JADELottery</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #54</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1001516</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1001516</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 18:45:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>JADELottery</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[I given that much thought. That's why I think BOT Picking might be the way. A BOT, short for roBOT, can be programmed the pick up on those kinds of subtle things to hack the lottery's computer picking method, fixed or not.]]></description>
      <category>JADELottery</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #53</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1001512</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1001512</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 18:39:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>MillionsWanted</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[If your statistics can show which numbers those fixing the lottery are playing, perhaps you should play those numbers as well.]]></description>
      <category>MillionsWanted</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #52</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1001499</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1001499</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 18:27:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Blackapple</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[If it is at all possible, lotteries may be rigged to provide one of two outcomes - either certain numbers played by those who do the rigging can be selected or the most popular numbers selected can be eliminated from the draw - and keep in mind that around 70% of all tickets purchased in any lottery will be quick picks. With the second possibility in mind data like this can be analyzed to eliminate certain numbers from non-QP selections to maximize the winning possibilities. Interesting thread]]></description>
      <category>Blackapple</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #51</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1001493</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1001493</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 18:08:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>JADELottery</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[Alright, I think I can post some additional information. First is the update from the last post.<br /><br />Data Stream Chrono Badger 5 Draw Wheel, Matched Draw #'s, Line Match Distribution Scramble Order<br /><br />(Implemented 2008-03-04)<br /><br />Index 0 Index 1 Posted Year Month Day A B C D E W M 0 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13<br /><br />95 91 Yes 2008 3 7 1 4 9 12 13 0 2 16 30 4          20 15 10 14 22 13 19 12 17 11 18 16 21<br /><br />96 92 Yes 2008 3 8 1 10 14 18 21 0 4 3 25 14 8       14 1... [&nbsp;<a href="http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/1001493">More</a>&nbsp;]]]></description>
      <category>JADELottery</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #50</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/997928</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/997928</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 08:16:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>JADELottery</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[While working the numbers on this last update, I've come across a few interesting things. I'll get back to this in a few days to see how and where this is headed. Unreasonable is a word that can best describe what I'm seeing. To be continued...]]></description>
      <category>JADELottery</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #49</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/991386</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/991386</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 09:56:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>JADELottery</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[Here is the data obtained so far for this 90 successful draw set for dates from 2007-12-04 to 2008-03-06; additional information to follow.<br /><br />Index 0 Index 1 Posted Year Month Day A B C D E W M 0 1 2 3 4 5 Scramble Order<br /><br />1 1 Yes 2007 12 4 2 4 11 15 22 0 3 12 23 11 4<br /><br />2 2 Yes 2007 12 5 1 2 9 20 29 0 1 31 19<br /><br />3 3 Yes 2007 12 6 4 12 14 16 20 0 4 6 18 20 4 2]]></description>
      <category>JADELottery</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #48</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/991135</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/991135</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 23:08:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>JADELottery</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[We're lost in a sea of information.<br /><br />Actually, 2008-03-06 is the 90th successful draw, but that's ok.<br /><br />We've been using wheel 0 to post our number anyway even though the numbers are scrambled and using the exact same numbers.<br /><br />We'll continue the scramble postings anyway.]]></description>
      <category>JADELottery</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #47</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/990466</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/990466</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 22:22:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>JADELottery</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[We'll update the status of Exp. 2 later this week.<br /><br />2008-03-03 was the 90th successful post.<br /><br />There is a change, however, in the posted wheels.<br /><br />The same numbers are being used in the wheel, {10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22}.<br /><br />Instead of having a fixed set of 10 wheels, numbered {0 to 9}, all the numbers are randomly scrambled by position and then inserted in to the wheel.<br /><br />Example, last night's posted wheel (2008-03-04) had its numbers scrambled to {13, 14, 16, 20,]]></description>
      <category>JADELottery</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #46</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/984260</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/984260</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 23:32:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>JADELottery</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[Right now we're at 77 successful posted wheels for Experiment 2. I'll make a 90 posting/draws update some time after 2008-03-06, the 90 successful postings date. At this point, 4 postings are missing due to personal, computer and LP server related issues. Experiment 2 would have ended 2008-03-02 were it not for these missed wheel postings. We'll keep posting wheels and make an update every 90 successful wheel postings till possibly the end of this year.]]></description>
      <category>JADELottery</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #45</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/983709</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/983709</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 00:42:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>JADELottery</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[time*treat,<br /><br />Fixed can have different meanings to the person reading this topic, as you have pointed out. However, in this topic 'fixed' refers to the alteration of the normal random selection of numbers relative to the number being played for that day's drawing. An alteration can be a very subtle change in the number, number sub-combinations or number combination as to produce a selection that can be correlated to the numbers being played.]]></description>
      <category>JADELottery</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #44</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/983703</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/983703</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 00:33:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>JADELottery</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[JKING,<br /><br />There is a possible tie in with how Quick Picks are generated, but that's a side topic relative to this one and is certainly being looked at on the local purchasing level and the broader multiple cities/county/state purchasing level. I've noticed in my travels some unusual anomalies in the picking that don't seem to suggest random selections. I can't get into much detail now, but keep an eye out for it.]]></description>
      <category>JADELottery</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #43</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/974593</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/974593</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 21:40:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>JADELottery</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[JKING: I know I said I would not respond to any of your posts, but eh.. I can be somewhat of an azs. I'll get back to your post a little later.<br /><br />time*treat: I'll back to you a little later also.<br /><br />All: My place is a bit of a mess right now. I'm in the process of building three table/desks for myself and my sons. Space was pretty well limited and I had a huge monstrosity of an old desk I needed to get rid of. Now there's lots of room for the computer wares, couch converted futon and my pool ta... [&nbsp;<a href="http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/974593">More</a>&nbsp;]]]></description>
      <category>JADELottery</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #42</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/974362</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/974362</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 13:30:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>time*treat</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[Does 'fixed' mean 'not evenly distributed' or does 'fixed' mean 'responds in some way' to what combos are played]]></description>
      <category>time*treat</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #41</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/973592</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/973592</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 19:33:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>JKING</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[Hi,<br /><br />Maybe the problem isn't the way the numbers are picked. Maybe it is the way quick pick numbers are being issued. Take the2/2/08 California Fantasy 5, for example. The numbers picked were 7,9,11,13,15. The interesting thing about it is that there 14 winners hitting 5 out of 5. My guess is that most of the winners were quick picks. Only because, just about anyone at the LP would have filtered out this combination. So, why fix the draw when you can issue low pecentage chance quick picks]]></description>
      <category>JKING</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #40</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/972327</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/972327</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 21:18:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>JADELottery</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[Due to the recent Lottery Post server and Lottery Post Member Pages server inaccessibility and instability, I'm reposting the opening post so you can see the graphs.<br /><br />Also, you can go to this link to see the opening post.<br /><br />http://members.aol.com/jadelottery/hpslcgnf.htm<br /><br />How do I prove my state lottery's Computer Generated Numbers are fixed?<br /><br />This is a perplexing and difficult task, but it's not beyond a reasonable plausibility. The task becomes an experiment with a number of]]></description>
      <category>JADELottery</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #39</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/970154</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/970154</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 05:24:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>JADELottery</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[Distinguishing between the probable and improbable takes time in a matter of this kind.<br /><br />We'll just keep chugging along with the posting for a while before we make a formal reply.<br /><br />Thanks for the input.]]></description>
      <category>JADELottery</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #38</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/965773</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/965773</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 22:08:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>GASMETERGUY</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[JadeLottery<br /><br />I really appreciate all the work you have put into the Wisconsin lotto and I wish you the best.  I can tell from the way you wrote up your data you are well educated.  Not many people can write as well.<br /><br />I have only one reservation, however.<br /><br />While I agree CGN drawings can and probably are fixed in some way, proving it by statistics based on the drawings is impossible.  Lotteries are random.  The last draw has no influence on the next draw.  Knowing this, can anyone take the d... [&nbsp;<a href="http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/965773">More</a>&nbsp;]]]></description>
      <category>GASMETERGUY</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #37</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/962786</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/962786</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 08:07:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>JADELottery</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[As stated in my blog, this will be an all year project for experiment 2.<br /><br />I missed 3 prediction posts and that needs to be made up for in a longer than 90 days I had planned on.<br /><br />Oh-well, I hope I can keep up this time.]]></description>
      <category>JADELottery</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #36</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/947093</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/947093</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2007 09:55:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>JADELottery</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[I'd like to say, I do appreciate your input as a means of advice from your perspective or of an opinion from mine. It does serve to help broaden my own perspective in various parts of the overall question. However, I'm not restricted to just the proposed question of topic, as you have so obviously pointed out in question, yourself. At this time, I can not answer many of your questions that might reveal my true nature as they will present themselves in due time. You are though, free to ask any qu... [&nbsp;<a href="http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/947093">More</a>&nbsp;]]]></description>
      <category>JADELottery</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #35</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/947089</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/947089</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2007 09:06:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>nanolike</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[JadeLottery, what I do see in the graphs and all the data is this;<br /><br />They do seem to bring up suspision that it  the wisconsin lottery  could be fixed to a level of accuracy beyond normal suspision.<br /><br />That being the case, you might wonder how or why you even or ever noticed what you noticed and put together the incredible data in the first place.<br /><br />And what your true goal is now?<br /><br />Is it to prove something to yourself? Or to win? Please dont say both it really is one more than the othe... [&nbsp;<a href="http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/947089">More</a>&nbsp;]]]></description>
      <category>nanolike</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #34</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/947086</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/947086</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2007 08:12:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>nanolike</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[JADELottery<br /><br />I agree JADELottery there are things going on outside the drawing in order to bring about a certain fixed outcome. I have known this for years. In fact I can prove the lottery is rigged, unfortunately it will do me no good to post the 100% accurate detailed data on this site.<br /><br />There is a part of me  the ego  that wants to be the first in the world to publicate it but I have been holding on to it for some time, maybe just waiting for the right moment I dont know?<br /><br />But it is ri... [&nbsp;<a href="http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/947086">More</a>&nbsp;]]]></description>
      <category>nanolike</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #33</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/946531</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/946531</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 07:38:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>JADELottery</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[Within the same concept, but on a wider spectrum... your thinking is in the arena, but there are things going on outside it that need to be accounted for.]]></description>
      <category>JADELottery</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #32</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/946522</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/946522</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 06:01:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Stack47</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[Not necessarily connected to the same computer doing the number generation, but at least to the same organization that supplies it.<br /><br />If each terminal individually generated random QPs and when sales volume is high, there should be more duplicate tickets and have more drawings with multiple winners. Ohio started with a 50 cents ticket 6/40 lotto game in April 1983 and raised it to $1 tickets in November 1983. From then until the game ended in April 1987, it was rare to see only 1 winning ticke... [&nbsp;<a href="http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/946522">More</a>&nbsp;]]]></description>
      <category>Stack47</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #31</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/946475</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/946475</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 03:46:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>JADELottery</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[You've touched on a good point about Quick Picks. If it's possible to fix or rig Self Pick related CGN's, then the fixing or rigging of Quick Picks is just as susceptible and possible even more likely, given the fact that all terminals are connected to one central computer. Not necessarily connected to the same computer doing the number generation, but at least to the same organization that supplies it. Hypothetically speaking, of course.]]></description>
      <category>JADELottery</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #30</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/946441</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/946441</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 02:36:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>johnph77</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[If it is at all possible, lotteries may be rigged to provide one of two outcomes - either certain numbers played by those who do the rigging can be selected or the most popular numbers selected can be eliminated from the draw - and keep in mind that around 70% of all tickets purchased in any lottery will be quick picks. With the second possibility in mind data like this can be analyzed to eliminate certain numbers from non-QP selections to maximize the winning possibilities. Interesting thread]]></description>
      <category>johnph77</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #29</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/946085</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/946085</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 13:18:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>nanolike</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[JADELottery<br /><br />I agree.]]></description>
      <category>nanolike</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #28</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/946062</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/946062</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 11:43:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>WIN  D</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[WoW !   LOOK over there....  it's a ...distraction.   LOL]]></description>
      <category>WIN  D</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #27</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/946049</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/946049</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 09:11:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>JADELottery</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[Ok everyone... let's all get along... we've said what needs to be said.<br /><br />Everyone's point is valid and let's just leave it at that.<br /><br />Thank you for the exchange of information, ideas, opinions and advice... we are all wiser from it now.<br /><br />Now it's time to work the original question stated at the beginning of this topic.]]></description>
      <category>JADELottery</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #26</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/945959</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/945959</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 02:36:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Stack47</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[I think my opinion or suggestion, advice whatever you want to call it is very good. I think it can aid someone in winning.<br /><br />Then start your own thread; it's really easy.<br /><br />All those graphs might help but i think they drain a person of his real creative intuitions.<br /><br />Nope the real drain on creative intuitions is answering pests that add nothing to a discussion.<br /><br />I am almost certain I read on lotterypost one time somewhere, about an actress, who was always striving to get a golden globe... [&nbsp;<a href="http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/945959">More</a>&nbsp;]]]></description>
      <category>Stack47</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #25</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/945912</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/945912</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 01:20:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>nanolike</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[I think my opinion or suggestion, advice whatever you want to call it is very good. I think it can aid someone in winning.<br /><br />The brass tacs of what I was simply saying is this; Just relax! Take it easy, dont sweat it, let all your striving to WIN go, just let it go, the lottery will still be there tomorrow if you dont win so be it.<br /><br />Take a break in otherwords, just get away from it all for a moment. That is all I am suggesting. I think that is good advice.<br /><br />Do you ever find sometimes as y... [&nbsp;<a href="http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/945912">More</a>&nbsp;]]]></description>
      <category>nanolike</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #24</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/945827</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/945827</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 23:04:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Clairvoyance</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[What gives you the right to tell anyone what to do with their own time and knowledge? What are you? The lottery Warden?<br /><br />By the way, I don't think Todd is going to tell anyone here what to do with their time either!<br /><br />Enough said, you are butting in where your butt don't belong.]]></description>
      <category>Clairvoyance</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #23</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/945790</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/945790</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 22:08:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>RJOh</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[OK in the hopes of aiding you in your win let me give you three bits of advice or suggestions.<br /><br />posted by nanolike<br /><br />I read your post and saw nothing that would aid anyone in winning a lottery.]]></description>
      <category>RJOh</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #22</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/945775</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/945775</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 21:04:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Lotterologist</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[Very interesting, Doug.<br /><br />Thanks]]></description>
      <category>Lotterologist</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #21</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/944749</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/944749</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 04:56:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Stack47</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[Are you a professional pest or is it just a hobby?<br /><br />I think that most advid lottery players are hypnotized.<br /><br />Then start a thread in the Mystical forum or on a blog and let Doug discuss mathematics in the Mathematics forum.]]></description>
      <category>Stack47</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #20</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/944056</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/944056</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 10:28:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>JADELottery</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[Also, before I go to bed.<br /><br />A word being defined can not contain the word itself.<br /><br />It would be illogical to assume that the word in the definition is somehow defined by the definition it is being used in, even by context.<br /><br />It can only be a word of description.<br /><br />Therefore, the word 'opinion' in the worded definition of 'advice' can not be assumed to be the same as 'advice' also.]]></description>
      <category>JADELottery</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #19</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/944054</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/944054</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 10:02:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>JADELottery</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[an opinion or recommendation offered as a guide to action, conduct, etc.<br /><br />The underlined is the operative part of the meaning, of which the pointed out opinions didn't satisfy.<br /><br />They were just that opinions only, nothing more.<br /><br />An opinion is an idea or judgment and that's all I go from the pointed out opinions.<br /><br />Just because opinion is part of the definition does not mean it is the word being defined.]]></description>
      <category>JADELottery</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #18</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/944053</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/944053</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 09:54:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>nanolike</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[Great a wise guy, well I'll answer this before I call it a night.<br /><br />Advice<br /><br />noun<br /><br />1.an opinion or recommendation offered as a guide to action, conduct, etc.: I shall act on your advice.<br /><br />Synonyms 1. admonition, warning, caution; guidance; urging. Advice, counsel, recommendation, suggestion, persuasion, exhortation refer to opinions urged with more or less force as worthy bases for thought, opinion, conduct, or action. Advice is a practical recommendation as to action or conduct]]></description>
      <category>nanolike</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #17</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/944052</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/944052</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 09:39:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>JADELottery</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[OK in the hopes of aiding you in your win let me give you three bits of advice.<br /><br />1)<br /><br />I think that most advid lottery players are hypnotized.<br /><br />It started somewhere and hasn't ended yet, then one day they come to a conclusion that maybe they have been spending way to much time on one subject.<br /><br />I am in no way trying to stir people away from a nice forum as lottery post,<br /><br />but I do not think even Todd would wish that any  one thing  would consume  ones life  to a point of jeopardizing other parts o... [&nbsp;<a href="http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/944052">More</a>&nbsp;]]]></description>
      <category>JADELottery</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #16</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/944049</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/944049</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 08:52:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>nanolike</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[OK in the hopes of aiding you in your win let me give you three bits of advice or suggestions.<br /><br />1) I think that most advid lottery players are hypnotized. It started somewhere and hasn't ended yet, then one day they come to a conclusion that maybe they have been spending way to much time on one subject. I am in no way trying to stir people away from a nice forum as lottery post, but I do not think even Todd would wish that any  one thing  would consume  ones life  to a point of jeopardizing ot... [&nbsp;<a href="http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/944049">More</a>&nbsp;]]]></description>
      <category>nanolike</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #15</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/944045</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/944045</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 08:20:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>JADELottery</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[You are right and that's the other fun part of this. How to use this to an advantage? I think I've said too much. Oops, silly me.]]></description>
      <category>JADELottery</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #14</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/944044</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/944044</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 08:18:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>JADELottery</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[Great, glad to see you have moved on.<br /><br />Me hero, heh... I'm the furthest thing from a hero. I'd probably go so far as to say I'm an anti-hero, but enough of that.<br /><br />Not going to happen? Well, that remains to be seen. They don't me ver-wee well, do they?<br /><br />No one care? I'm not so sure that's an absolute fact. Ya might want to research that again.<br /><br />As for tracking people down, that sounds more like a personal problem I'd rather not open up.<br /><br />Good luck to ya.]]></description>
      <category>JADELottery</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #13</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/944042</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/944042</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 08:03:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>LANTERN</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[I think that you are right in what I read of your post, I didn't read all of it!<br /><br />But Let Douglas be, this is what he wants to do and is doing, it might help him with lottery prediction in some way.]]></description>
      <category>LANTERN</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #12</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/944041</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/944041</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 08:03:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>nanolike</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[We'll in way we think alike but the difference is, I've found out what I needed and moved on.<br /><br />I trust you are still lingering in the thoughts that the lottery can be won by some strategy that you incorporate in your playing, or you can somehow prove the lottery is rigged and then by doing so win it, or perhaps prove to the world that it is rigged/fixed then be some sort of hero for doing so. Not gonna happen! No one cares. Unfortunately.<br /><br />Been there done that!<br /><br />I've even tracked dow... [&nbsp;<a href="http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/944041">More</a>&nbsp;]]]></description>
      <category>nanolike</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #11</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/944037</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/944037</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 07:46:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>JADELottery</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[Strange, seems contradictory to the poll you started, State lottery discovered corrupt!<br /><br />From what I can read in the poll/topic, it appears we'd have something in common. However, this reply seems to say otherwise.<br /><br />Hmmm...]]></description>
      <category>JADELottery</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #10</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/944029</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/944029</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 07:18:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>nanolike</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[Hows life outside your lottery research? How the Family? Friends? Yeah its alota graphs!<br /><br />Even if you could prove the lottery was rigged/fixed whatever? This is what i believe you are assuming correct?<br /><br />No one cares enough to do a thing about it! And those who do, already have enough on their plate politically. And those who might care will say  yeah i thought it was too  And those who do know its fixed will say  Tell me something I don't know!<br /><br />I am assuming you are suggesting the lott... [&nbsp;<a href="http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/944029">More</a>&nbsp;]]]></description>
      <category>nanolike</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #9</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/944021</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/944021</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 06:55:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>JADELottery</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[You're right. It would have been even bigger had I not put most of the data in the Excel Sheets. Whew! We'd be here all night downloading just one page.]]></description>
      <category>JADELottery</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #8</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/944019</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/944019</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 06:48:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>JADELottery</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[You hit on a good point,  ...what's probable and whats actually coming up... . Experiment 2 is working on that now. If the deficiencies continue, then it becomes more and more provable that what is happening is very improbable.<br /><br />I was actually expecting to find nothing when I started this, but when the data started coming within two weeks and I saw what was happening, WOW... I was surprised. I didn't think it would take effect that soon.]]></description>
      <category>JADELottery</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #7</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/944016</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/944016</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 06:42:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>nanolike</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[I would suggest that no one ad JADElottery long message into your reply. Could you imagine 8 or 9 people including JADELottery's message and their reply. Wow that might be the longest thread ever]]></description>
      <category>nanolike</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #6</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/944003</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/944003</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 05:51:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Thoth</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[Ouch! my head hurts now! So much to absord and so little time (as absorbing all that would require me to go to school for a good couple of years and get a math degree of some sort , lol)<br /><br />Awsome post though!<br /><br />I've often wondered about Indiana's lottery and how to prove it was rigged. I think the easiest and most compelling result would be to put in FOI request with the state pertaining all the sales data and compare the amounts of each combination sold against the actual draw results (say t... [&nbsp;<a href="http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/944003">More</a>&nbsp;]]]></description>
      <category>Thoth</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #5</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/943442</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/943442</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 13:10:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>JADELottery</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[Yes, it was about 1 - 1.5 years in the making for this porject. I first thought about using the Lottery Post in this way a few years before I actually came up with the final plan.<br /><br />As for Experiment 2, just watch the posted numbers on the Lottery Post prediction board and the WI Lottery Badger 5. I'll update this topic as needed. I've already stated at the end of the first post of what to look for as far as the numbers go.]]></description>
      <category>JADELottery</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #4</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/943440</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/943440</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 13:03:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Todd</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[Wow, that's a tremendous, well-written document.  Nice job!  Impressive use of graphics too.  Is this something you've been putting together for a while?<br /><br />Thanks vey much for sharing this and for writing it up so well.  I'm looking forward to reading your next installments]]></description>
      <category>Todd</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #3</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/943412</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/943412</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 07:45:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>JADELottery</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[Also, clarification on a point made at the end of the post.  ...possibly increase the deficiencies...  means the difference between the high frequency and low frequency would increase, not the number frequencies themselves.]]></description>
      <category>JADELottery</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #2</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/943411</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/943411</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 07:17:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>JADELottery</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[As a side note, look at the frequency distribution for the draw numbers. See how asymmetrical the pattern is; it seems normal on the left (low numbers), but look how choppy the pattern is on the right (higher numbers).<br /><br />Seems to me, whatever software that could possibly be used to randomly hide the act of fixing the draws, ain't workin'.]]></description>
      <category>JADELottery</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #1</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/943402</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260/943402</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 06:20:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>JADELottery</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[Update, this table was coded incorrectly. Below is the correct table.<br /><br />Experiment 0<br /><br />Draw Number Frequencies<br /><br />Below averageAbove average<br /><br />21<br /><br />63<br /><br />74<br /><br />85<br /><br />910<br /><br />1112<br /><br />1513<br /><br />1614<br /><br />1817<br /><br />2119<br /><br />2520<br /><br />2622<br /><br />2823<br /><br />3024<br /><br />27<br /><br />29<br /><br />31]]></description>
      <category>JADELottery</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How do I prove my state lottery's CGNs are fixed?</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 05:46:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>JADELottery</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[How do I prove my state lottery's Computer Generated Numbers are fixed? This is a perplexing and difficult task, but it's not beyond a reasonable plausibility. The task becomes an experiment with a number of steps to follow. Following this opening is a header outline of what can be expected in general; after that, each header is presented in more detail and may have data, graphs, explanations in logic and process, theories, etc. The contents in each header will not get too technical unless it is... [&nbsp;<a href="http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167260">More</a>&nbsp;]]]></description>
      <category>JADELottery</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>