<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
  <channel>
    <title>Roulette and the Law of the thirds.</title>
    <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/202238</link>
    <atom:link href="http://www.lotterypost.com/rss/topic/202238" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <description>Lottery Post Forum Topic: Roulette and the Law of the thirds.</description>
    <dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
    <generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #2</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/202238/1432755</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/202238/1432755</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 21:06:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>WIN  D</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[LOL..... Those stats up there aren't from the editorial section of the paper. Those are statistical results based on a very large data run. This isn't something new it's just a varification.<br /><br />(+ or -) big deal .....big variance demon. LOL<br /><br />What ?<br /><br />so what .....give me normal expectation plus or minus 10 or even 20%..... and I'll beat their brains out. LOL<br /><br />NO LAWS ...?? How about the Law of Large Numbers ....... Law of Averages ... on and on etc.<br /><br />example<br /><br />According to the]]></description>
      <category>WIN  D</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reply #1</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/202238/1432555</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/202238/1432555</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 18:02:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>eddessaknight</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[First of all there is no 'law' as in universal las like gravity that governs or compels outcomes besides there sheriff around to enforce your outcome when you need it most<br /><br />This is a mathematical attempt at achiveing equilibrium and expected balance-<br /><br />The big problem is that number outcomes often do not comply with statistical average expectaion.<br /><br />Check out the crtical factor called: VARIANCE demon.<br /><br />Appreciate this offering but it's been tested to death and loses according to the neaga... [&nbsp;<a href="http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/202238/1432555">More</a>&nbsp;]]]></description>
      <category>eddessaknight</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Roulette and the Law of the thirds.</title>
      <link>http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/202238</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/202238</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 20:52:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>WIN  D</dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[Law of the Third!!<br /><br />This is 999963 samples of 37 spins.<br /><br />1 PMZen pro Rotation: 0<br /><br />2 PMZen pro Rotation: 0<br /><br />3 PMZen pro Rotation: 0<br /><br />4 PMZen pro Rotation: 0<br /><br />5 PMZen pro Rotation: 0<br /><br />6 PMZen pro Rotation: 0<br /><br />7 PMZen pro Rotation: 0<br /><br />8 PMZen pro Rotation: 0<br /><br />9 PMZen pro Rotation: 0<br /><br />10 PMZen pro Rotation: 0<br /><br />11 PMZen pro Rotation: 0<br /><br />12 PMZen pro Rotation: 0<br /><br />13 PMZen pro Rotation: 0<br /><br />14 PMZen pro Rotation: 0<br /><br />15 PMZen pro Rotation: 3<br /><br />16 PMZen pro Rotation: 3... [&nbsp;<a href="http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/202238">More</a>&nbsp;]]]></description>
      <category>WIN  D</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
