United States
Member #17,554
June 22, 2005
5,582 Posts
Offline
I'm testing a new system I found. Looks promising, but you know how that goes. Will test for tonight's drawing and subsequent nights to follow, maybe for a week or two. I will back test it after I finish typing this in.
Make a list of the previous 7 nights winning numbers.
Count how many times each digit from 0-9 has come out.
Using the highest amount of single digit numbers, add last night's number and the next highest to those first group of numbers.
For an demonstration, I will take the last 7 night's drawings here in Florida, and see if the workout will hit tonight.
Jan. 6...508
Jan. 5...119
Jan. 4...470
Jan. 3...327
Jan. 2...797
Jan. 1...747
Dec. 31...104
Add up amount of digits 0-9:
0-3 times
1-3 times
2- once
3- once
4- 3 times
5- once
6- none
7- 6 times
8- once
9- 2 times
With 7 being the highest we will use that as the key number, and intergrated it with last night's number Jan. 6, which was 508.
75
70
78
Then we will intergrate the next highest amounts which are 0,1,4...all have the amount of 3 times.
750
751
754
700
701
704
780
781
784
That's all there is to it. For doubles there is a slight change. The change is that A number that is overdue usually comes in as a double. I will outline the specifics on this later down the road. I just want to see if the above works, then I will move on to doubles.
california United States
Member #23,474
October 13, 2005
659 Posts
Offline
Hi Pac,
I like the way this system figures in the most recent draw since most of the time there is a repeat number ( i think about 70% of the time). I'm gona do some back testing on CA and see how it woulda faired.
Thanx,
TA
"if you can hold it in your mind, you can hold it in your hand"
United States
Member #17,554
June 22, 2005
5,582 Posts
Offline
Hi Pac,
I like the way this system figures in the most recent draw since most of the time there is a repeat number ( i think about 70% of the time). I'm gona do some back testing on CA and see how it woulda faired.
Thanx,
TA
Thanx for doing a back test, because I can't until Wednesday, when I'm off from work.
It would save me alot of trouble.
I've got one for the p-4, to which I haven't touched yet, but did thumb through. That's next.
What's next after that is a system for p-5 and six, but those two have 15 pages of reading to do before I can feel comfortable in sharing. Lots of very unique info on that p-5 and 6 that I've never seen before. A certain kind of grouping numbers in a way that I can't believe I never saw before.
It's funny when you think nothing else can be done to vastly improve something.... then BANG!