All times shown are Eastern Time (GMT-5:00) | Home -> Forums -> Lottery Discussion -> Powerplay 10X (2nd Poll) md United States Member #14305 April 20, 2005 511 Posts Offline | | Posted: March 12, 2006, 12:14 pm - IP Logged | |
I think they should make it permanent, and I think they will. | | |
Indiana United States Member #29567 December 29, 2005 280 Posts Offline | | Posted: March 12, 2006, 12:17 pm - IP Logged | |
I agree that they should but I don't know that they will. With the new matrix the way it is it seems to me like fewer and fewer people are hitting five numbers. In fact I'm hitting less and less. Jim Money frees you from doing things you dislike. Since I dislike doing nearly everything, money is handy. - Groucho Marx
| | |
Morrison, IL United States Member #4741 May 13, 2004 1736 Posts Offline | | Posted: March 12, 2006, 12:18 pm - IP Logged | |
The second place winners have been hitting less than statistically expected lately, probably to make up for those two times last year when more than 80 players hit 5 out of 5. As for the 10x, I doubt they'd make it permanent, otherwise some participating lotteries could go broke if someone had 5 out of 5 with PowerPlay and 10x came up, especially the Virgin Islands lottery. | | |
United States Member #33479 February 18, 2006 733 Posts Offline | | Posted: March 12, 2006, 12:26 pm - IP Logged | |
If they keep the 10X then chances are it would become more difficult to win the powerball. They will hold out longer for the jackpot wins because there would be more smaller wins. | | |
Indiana United States Member #29567 December 29, 2005 280 Posts Offline | | Posted: March 12, 2006, 12:33 pm - IP Logged | |
I think the lack of second place winners has more to do with the new matrix than with some sort of statistical correction. And at least one of those times last year was due to the fortune cookie fluke. As for offering 10 X's on a regular basis. They will do it if they see a significant increase in Powerplay revenue but given the jackpot numbers I see (or more appropriately the cash value numbers I see) I doubt if that's really happening. The bottom line is if the incoming revenue is significantly greater than the prize payouts they will continue to offer it.
As far as I'm concerned it's just too damn bad if the smaller lotteries cry and whine about going broke. They are raking in profits on a game that quite frankly rarely pays off in a big way for all but a very rare few. Jim Money frees you from doing things you dislike. Since I dislike doing nearly everything, money is handy. - Groucho Marx
| | |
Pennsylvania United States Member #1366 April 6, 2003 2444 Posts Offline | | Posted: March 12, 2006, 2:04 pm - IP Logged | |
there are 16 spots on the wheel 2-3-4-5-2-3-4-5-2-3-4-5-2-3-4-5 the 10x is nice, (2-3-4-5-2-3-4-5-2-3-4-5-2-3-4-10) but I would rather see 2-3-4-5-6-7-8-2-3-4-5-6-7-8 and make that permanent Playing more than one ticket per game is betting against yourself. | | |
Stroudsburg, PA United States Member #1860 July 11, 2003 2642 Posts Offline | | Posted: March 12, 2006, 3:42 pm - IP Logged | |
there are 16 spots on the wheel 2-3-4-5-2-3-4-5-2-3-4-5-2-3-4-5 the 10x is nice, (2-3-4-5-2-3-4-5-2-3-4-5-2-3-4-10) but I would rather see 2-3-4-5-6-7-8-2-3-4-5-6-7-8 and make that permanent I never thought about that. That would be nice to see. I'll do some calculations later to see if it's feasible too.
| | |
Mcminnville, Oregon United States Member #3070 December 13, 2003 1516 Posts Offline | | Posted: March 12, 2006, 3:57 pm - IP Logged | |
I suggested to Musl to add 6x,7x,8x,9x,10x permanently to the powerplay wheel and reduce the 2x, 3x,4x,5x slots to make it work. They said that they could not afford to have those slots higher all the time. So I guess they would not be making enough profit to have it permanently.-weshar75 | | |
Morrison, IL United States Member #4741 May 13, 2004 1736 Posts Offline | | Posted: March 12, 2006, 6:07 pm - IP Logged | |
I think the lack of second place winners has more to do with the new matrix than with some sort of statistical correction. And at least one of those times last year was due to the fortune cookie fluke. As for offering 10 X's on a regular basis. They will do it if they see a significant increase in Powerplay revenue but given the jackpot numbers I see (or more appropriately the cash value numbers I see) I doubt if that's really happening. The bottom line is if the incoming revenue is significantly greater than the prize payouts they will continue to offer it.
As far as I'm concerned it's just too damn bad if the smaller lotteries cry and whine about going broke. They are raking in profits on a game that quite frankly rarely pays off in a big way for all but a very rare few. Jim Even with the new matrix, the MUSL statistically expected five match 5 winners for last night's draw yet got only two. It's just luck of the draw. As for the jackpot size, you can't estimate PowerPlay sales from that because the extra $1 does not go toward the jackpot. Lotteries are supposed to pay off big for only a few, especially Powerball and Mega Millions. If you want to play a game that gets won all the time, try playing your own in-state lottery games. It's either higher prizes and few winners or lower top prizes and more winners. You can't have your cake and eat it too. | | |
PA United States Member #23322 October 6, 2005 2006 Posts Offline | | Posted: March 12, 2006, 7:16 pm - IP Logged | |
Hmmmmmm yeah finally a 10x and NO second place winners here, and 4 3rd place winners. Coincidence, or a conspiracy?  | 0 Pennsylvania players matched 5 of 5 and the Power Ball; next estimated jackpot $75,000,000.00 | | 0 Pennsylvania players matched 5 of 5, each receiving $200,000.00 | | 4 Pennsylvania players matched 4 of 5 and the Power Ball, each receiving $10,000.00 |
True the last many draws have not had many winners either, but I think that was planned too. Less suspicious looking, makes for good defense. Course you go back to the beginning of the year and on, and it seems as though there was always winners for second prize, and under the same matrix. | | |
PA United States Member #23322 October 6, 2005 2006 Posts Offline | | Posted: March 12, 2006, 7:21 pm - IP Logged | |
"If you want to play a game that gets won all the time, try playing your own in-state lottery games. It's either higher prizes and few winners or lower top prizes and more winners. You can't have your cake and eat it too." I play both, and ironically I have always had better pay offs with the jackpot games than the smaller games. I am not sure if that is good or bad. I have won far more via lucky for life, match 6, and powerball overall. If you can't eat your own cake, why bother even making it? Cakes were meant to be eaten... | | |
md United States Member #14305 April 20, 2005 511 Posts Offline | | Posted: March 23, 2006, 7:42 pm - IP Logged | |
It doesn't look good for the 10X Powerplay promotion isn't doing good. | | |
md United States Member #14305 April 20, 2005 511 Posts Offline | | Posted: March 25, 2006, 8:32 pm - IP Logged | |
Two more chances for 10X Powerplay. Tonight and Wednesday! | | |
Morrison, IL United States Member #4741 May 13, 2004 1736 Posts Offline | | Posted: March 26, 2006, 1:16 am - IP Logged | |
| | |
|