You last visited September 6, 2008, 10:07 pm
|
Same Mega Ball three drawings in a row...
Just Guru to you! United States Member #91 January 19, 2002 4775 Posts Offline |
| Posted: May 13, 2008, 3:03 pm - IP Logged |
|
sorry to hit at you shane but man every sentence you wrote above makes no logical sense...how do you play $1 and "actually wager $260" <<this is ridiculous...the behavior of the balls is random..."a way of misdirecting the MM sentinels"...what sentinels?...suppose i play 3-11-12-27-47..MM 5 ..what will the sentinels do according to your statement?.. your statement implies that they somehow they manipulate what balls come out of the machine which would be immposible to do with 56 balls spinning as fast as they do...remember that you can buy tickets in ohio 10 min before draw...how will they set up particular balls in that short amount of time to come out so that no one is winnner according to your theory?...it is clear to me that you dont understand simple statistics...there are 176 million combos...since many players will play they will sell millions of different combos each time and only one combo will win...each jackpot game is designed to make a profit for lottery since its creation of the format and payouts at the beginning...it is statistically proven based on matrix and studies on player participation and payouts for every category...you can try anything but you will not cheat the odds and statistics of the game beleive me... I too believe that Lee Harvey acted alone....
but I love a good conspiracy.....
and we have to have people that are willing to look under every rock, in order to keep everybody in check.....even you have a theory benmas.....
|
|
|
mid-Ohio United States Member #9 March 24, 2001 8978 Posts Online |
| Posted: May 13, 2008, 3:31 pm - IP Logged |
|
I have a theory, with odds of 1:176M, thousands of players will buy 10-20 tickets every drawing and never come close to winning a jackpot during their life time.
Facts are I could predict every drawing that no one would win the jackpot and be right 90% of the time but that doesn't mean I could predict all the winning numbers even once in a life time even if I had a 1000 chances every drawing.
Knowing that I'm likely to be one of those thousands of losers doesn't keep me from buying a few tickets every drawing. Some one who bought a ticket is going to win a jackpot sooner or later and it could be me.(I hope) What happens most is most likely to happen again
|
|
|
Pennsylvania United States Member #56485 October 28, 2007 353 Posts Offline |
| Posted: May 13, 2008, 8:22 pm - IP Logged |
|
I too believe that Lee Harvey acted alone....
but I love a good conspiracy.....
and we have to have people that are willing to look under every rock, in order to keep everybody in check.....even you have a theory benmas..... fja i don't mind conspiracy theories per se but at least tell me something that is beleivable or has some sort of logic behind it ...this guy said: "Actually there is a simpler formula that maximizes each number played 260-fold. That means for every $1 dollar you spend you are actually wagering 260 numbers($260)"....i mean c'mon now how does the $1 become $260 or 6 numbers become 260...each line has a single shot by itself and not 260 shots...why is there a formula for a random draw to begin with?...the words "formula" and "random" contradict each other
if you were to look at other lotteries across the states you will see from time to time occurences that statistically have a ~3% chance of happening, so when they do happen and people notice them they think something is going on for example: PA match 6 lotto
| 12/25/2007 |
24 25 26 27 48 49 |
| 12/28/2007 |
2 16 17 27 37 49 |
some people will think that 12/25 was fixed and 12/28 not...i watched both draws and the balls came out randomly from the machine
same thing with mega ball 26 coming out three times in a row..whats the big deal it just so happened
|
|
|
Michigan United States Member #55299 August 31, 2007 488 Posts Offline |
| Posted: May 16, 2008, 11:14 pm - IP Logged |
|
Yet another 26 Mega Ball!  I had one EP that picked it though. >_>
The host of the drawing annoys me with how he says the amount with a fake "wow" type delivery. With odds like 1 in 175,711,536 how can I lose?!
You can't predict random.
|
|
|
United States Member #41809 June 16, 2006 1486 Posts Offline |
| Posted: May 19, 2008, 1:20 am - IP Logged |
|
The drawing is not fixed.....however I can gurantee you to a high degree of certainty that the game is designed to payout on the combinations that will pay out the minimal amount so that they can make a profit. Why does the #26 show up three time in a row? Simple....because some player out there is spending a whole lot of money on those three drawings and the #26 in his pack is distributed unevenly. If the said player playes the exact series of combinations he did for the last there drawings I can gurantee you #26 would show up again.
How many times have I told you.....with proper series of combinations you can manipulate which direction the numbers will not go.....the trick is to having a series of combinations that will fall into the column of least waged upon numbers. Hint hint! And knowing this, just exactly how many times have you won even a 5x5, let alone a jackpot ?
Just as I thought...
|
|
|
United States Member #41809 June 16, 2006 1486 Posts Offline |
| Posted: May 19, 2008, 1:26 am - IP Logged |
|
Actually there is a simpler formula that maximizes each number played 260-fold. That means for every $1 dollar you spend you are actually wagering 260 numbers($260)....therefore you won't need to spend $10K A third of that amount will do the trick. I will be posting my 25 series of actual tests to demonstrate the behaviour of the balls to actual numbers waged. The hardest part of it creating the pool net into which the balls with enter. But it absolutely can be done. I've been riding a winning wave.....though I have also found out it is a bit easier if you sprout your numbes across statelines.....a way of misdirecting the MM sentinels that are seriously hard to evade.
Coming soon I promise. Just be sure to give us a definition of your idea of what a 'winning wave' is.
To some people, it's getting ONE WB number right: but to me, it's getting a 4x5 every other month.
I have no doubts people can and do have 'systems' that enable them to hit a 3x5 once in awhile, but that only pays $7 in Powerball, and these people usually spend $20-$40 to hit it.
Let's spread your system across 10 games and see how it does.
|
|
|
Alexandria,VA United States Member #51529 March 26, 2007 91 Posts Offline |
| Posted: May 19, 2008, 2:43 pm - IP Logged |
|
Guesser:
Just to clairify, you are saying that you would define a "winning wave" as getting 4 out of 5 numbers every other month.
Does that mean you have a system which does this -- or only that you would not consider it until it produced like that?
If the first, would you mind sharing with the group....
If the second, when would you start tracking? Say a system produced two back to back 4 out 5 wins -- yet failed to produce another
until three months down the line -- would that be a winning wave?
|
|
|
mid-Ohio United States Member #9 March 24, 2001 8978 Posts Online |
| Posted: May 19, 2008, 6:18 pm - IP Logged |
|
Guesser:
Just to clairify, you are saying that you would define a "winning wave" as getting 4 out of 5 numbers every other month.
Does that mean you have a system which does this -- or only that you would not consider it until it produced like that?
If the first, would you mind sharing with the group....
If the second, when would you start tracking? Say a system produced two back to back 4 out 5 wins -- yet failed to produce another
until three months down the line -- would that be a winning wave? In the Maddog MegaMillions challenge, had any one had the 12 WB 06-11-16-20-24-27-31-39-43-46-47-56 for the last three drawings they would have scored at least a 5+0 all three times but with 3168 possible combinations including the four MB, it's unlikely they would have done better than 3+0 in one of the real games. It hard to get a 4of5 even when you have all the inning numbers in a small pool unless you use a large wheel. What happens most is most likely to happen again
|
|
|
|
