All times shown are Eastern Time (GMT-5:00) | Home -> Forums -> Jackpot Games -> 6-49 Canada rainbow lake Canada Member #25525 November 2, 2005 10157 Posts Offline | | Posted: May 19, 2009, 1:41 pm - IP Logged | |
6-49 at 49 million Tax Free! Secret to $uccess=Law of Attraction | | |
Toronto, Ontario Canada Member #67325 November 7, 2008 28 Posts Offline | | Posted: May 22, 2009, 10:12 pm - IP Logged | |
G.! I hope you played for it using my prediction list! Did you see that I got that huge jackpot in the list? Number of plays in the prediction list: 890496 plays Matches type Matches count Odds Improvement 6 1 15.70 times 5+Bonus 0 0 times 5 69 4.33 times 4 1897 2.20 times 3 24434 1.56 times 2+Bonus 0 0 times Total 26401 (any prize) 1.60 times Eeh?eeh?  | | |
mid-Ohio United States Member #9 March 24, 2001 13921 Posts Offline | | Posted: May 23, 2009, 8:58 pm - IP Logged | |
G.! I hope you played for it using my prediction list! Did you see that I got that huge jackpot in the list? Number of plays in the prediction list: 890496 plays Matches type Matches count Odds Improvement 6 1 15.70 times 5+Bonus 0 0 times 5 69 4.33 times 4 1897 2.20 times 3 24434 1.56 times 2+Bonus 0 0 times Total 26401 (any prize) 1.60 times Eeh?eeh?  Sounds like congratulations are in order if you believed in your predictions enough to play them yourself. 

* that which happens most * * is most likely to happen again * 
| | |
Idaho United States Member #56982 November 21, 2007 3940 Posts Offline | | Posted: May 24, 2009, 2:21 am - IP Logged | |
Is your list showing 890496 plays? That is a lot of lines to play! "No one remembers the person who almost climbed the mountain, only the person who eventually gets to the top." ThatScaryChick | | |
Toronto, Ontario Canada Member #67325 November 7, 2008 28 Posts Offline | | Posted: May 24, 2009, 7:54 pm - IP Logged | |
Is your list showing 890496 plays? That is a lot of lines to play! Nope, it's a lot less than 14 million combinations! The goal of my prediction system is to get improved odds of winning as often as possible . Of course, the idea is not to play all of the ~800K combos at once: If you played 1 of the 890496 combinations of my list, then you had 15.70 times more chance to win the jackpot than if you played without using a system (1 of the 14 million natural combinations). Also, notice the significant improvement of the odds for the other prize tiers, and the overall odds. You had 1.60 times more chance to hit any prize if you chose 1 play from my list. Think what happens when you choose 10 plays, or 100 plays (assuming you play with a group) from my list. For more details please read the thread here http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/188914 , or visit my site. For RJOh , I also have similar predictions for Ohio Classic Lotto, so check them out, as they've been quite performant: 6 jackpots predicted in the last 5 months. | | |
mid-Ohio United States Member #9 March 24, 2001 13921 Posts Offline | | Posted: May 27, 2009, 1:06 pm - IP Logged | |
Nope, it's a lot less than 14 million combinations! The goal of my prediction system is to get improved odds of winning as often as possible . Of course, the idea is not to play all of the ~800K combos at once: If you played 1 of the 890496 combinations of my list, then you had 15.70 times more chance to win the jackpot than if you played without using a system (1 of the 14 million natural combinations). Also, notice the significant improvement of the odds for the other prize tiers, and the overall odds. You had 1.60 times more chance to hit any prize if you chose 1 play from my list. Think what happens when you choose 10 plays, or 100 plays (assuming you play with a group) from my list. For more details please read the thread here http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/188914 , or visit my site. For RJOh , I also have similar predictions for Ohio Classic Lotto, so check them out, as they've been quite performant: 6 jackpots predicted in the last 5 months. I was getting ready to make out some play slips for tonight's drawing for Ohio Classic Lotto and wanted to check your predictions and statistics for 6/49 games and couldn't find any for any games. Oh well, I guess I will have to make due with my own system. * that which happens most * * is most likely to happen again * 
| | |
Toronto, Ontario Canada Member #67325 November 7, 2008 28 Posts Offline | | Posted: May 27, 2009, 2:06 pm - IP Logged | |
I was getting ready to make out some play slips for tonight's drawing for Ohio Classic Lotto and wanted to check your predictions and statistics for 6/49 games and couldn't find any for any games. Oh well, I guess I will have to make due with my own system. Where did you search for them? The files are too big (~3MB) to fit into the Predictions section here, that's why I put them on my site. The link is on my profile (I'm not allowed to post links in messages), or here's another way to say it: rationalplay dot net 
| | |
mid-Ohio United States Member #9 March 24, 2001 13921 Posts Offline | | Posted: May 27, 2009, 5:25 pm - IP Logged | |
Where did you search for them? The files are too big (~3MB) to fit into the Predictions section here, that's why I put them on my site. The link is on my profile (I'm not allowed to post links in messages), or here's another way to say it: rationalplay dot net 
Found you website. I have a dial-up connection and didn't have time to wait for a 3.15MB file to down load. I would never spend $920,938 on one drawing for Ohio Classic Lotto since its jackpot cash value is not much more than that. Besides, one would have to make out almost 10,000 play slips which I doubt anyone could do between drawings. I seldom buy more than $1000 worth of tickets for any game. * that which happens most * * is most likely to happen again * 
| | |
Toronto, Ontario Canada Member #67325 November 7, 2008 28 Posts Offline | | Posted: May 27, 2009, 5:41 pm - IP Logged | |
Please do not misinterpret what I said. I quote: "the idea is not to play all of the ~800K combos at once". You can find the rest of the "How To" in the thread mentioned above, or in the FAQ section of my site. That kind of sarcastic comment like yours makes me wonder if some people deserve the sharing of any kind of system.  | | |
|