You last visited May 24, 2013, 2:53 am All times shown are Eastern Time (GMT-5:00) | Brainstorming using Smart Luck Advantage PlusLas Vegas, NV United States Member #45283 August 9, 2006 1136 Posts Offline | | Posted: April 7, 2010, 11:30 am - IP Logged | |
One caveat Maria. If we look at a range of 20 draws only you see them huddled together quite often more than 3 or 4 numbesr with the same ranking. So we have to decide which ones to choose or go for 100 draws when in most cases you will see 3, 4 or max 5 favorites. If you take 4 it anyway will boil down to 18 numbers or less as they do repeat. What do you think? Well we can go a bunch of different ways here ... and I think this is where we would have to decide if this strategy is for the long haul run and just to have coverage, then picking the high ranking ones won't differ much whether the entire history is used or the last 100 games, because the same #'s will be in there. The problem would come when trying to narrow down the "right" power #'s if this were going to be a wheel in constant play. I'm not sure which I prefer, hence why no recent jackpot yet!!! If trying to create the wheel for spot play (meaning using those special "3-5" along with the currents for the next 3 draws) then any number of groups can work which brings us back to trying to create that killer pool; which from my experience means overlapping wheels pulling the numbers from a variety of charts (and just trying things). If you notice, on any given day one chart (let's say chart 4) can contain all 5 winners; and on other days you'll see 2 here, 2 somewhere else and maybe just 1 from another. My latest creation of 2 wheels is using this strategy, but has me in a holding pattern because I chose one power number for each wheel (example: my "10 & Friends") where 10 is the power number and its a matter of waiting for that group to show strong in the L10, then I'll pounce ... The idea being that these numbers will roll around and come together every so often because history has shown that it does, and so if patient (keep in mind this is a sort of base wheel and not the only one to play at any given time) a 4 out of 5 is pretty much guaranteed. As well as 3 of 5's. The ultimate 5 of 5 could come as well. I just don't want to be playing a wheel for what seems like forever so that even if a "4" does materialize it just barely pays back what was spent! | | |
Krakow Poland Member #86326 February 2, 2010 445 Posts Offline | | Posted: April 7, 2010, 11:34 am - IP Logged | |
Well we can go a bunch of different ways here ... and I think this is where we would have to decide if this strategy is for the long haul run and just to have coverage, then picking the high ranking ones won't differ much whether the entire history is used or the last 100 games, because the same #'s will be in there. The problem would come when trying to narrow down the "right" power #'s if this were going to be a wheel in constant play. I'm not sure which I prefer, hence why no recent jackpot yet!!! If trying to create the wheel for spot play (meaning using those special "3-5" along with the currents for the next 3 draws) then any number of groups can work which brings us back to trying to create that killer pool; which from my experience means overlapping wheels pulling the numbers from a variety of charts (and just trying things). If you notice, on any given day one chart (let's say chart 4) can contain all 5 winners; and on other days you'll see 2 here, 2 somewhere else and maybe just 1 from another. My latest creation of 2 wheels is using this strategy, but has me in a holding pattern because I chose one power number for each wheel (example: my "10 & Friends") where 10 is the power number and its a matter of waiting for that group to show strong in the L10, then I'll pounce ... The idea being that these numbers will roll around and come together every so often because history has shown that it does, and so if patient (keep in mind this is a sort of base wheel and not the only one to play at any given time) a 4 out of 5 is pretty much guaranteed. As well as 3 of 5's. The ultimate 5 of 5 could come as well. I just don't want to be playing a wheel for what seems like forever so that even if a "4" does materialize it just barely pays back what was spent! That's one of the reasons I did go for 20 draws which keeps us in touch with what's going on in last draws. Only pairings are from last 500 draws. | | |
Las Vegas, NV United States Member #45283 August 9, 2006 1136 Posts Offline | | Posted: April 7, 2010, 11:43 am - IP Logged | |
Sounds like a plan. Let's see what happens. I will work on it and try to post something in Perdue's Pick 5 Thread today. I got 3 of 5 yesterday, so I have a big $11 to work with! Good luck today/tonight! It's already evening for you ... Sorry bout that! Maria | | |
Krakow Poland Member #86326 February 2, 2010 445 Posts Offline | | Posted: April 7, 2010, 11:55 am - IP Logged | |
Sounds like a plan. Let's see what happens. I will work on it and try to post something in Perdue's Pick 5 Thread today. I got 3 of 5 yesterday, so I have a big $11 to work with! Good luck today/tonight! It's already evening for you ... Sorry bout that! Maria Thanks and the same to you! I would say it's late afternoon and the dog has already been out for a walk. You know that to make it really work it's gonna take some time. | | |
Krakow Poland Member #86326 February 2, 2010 445 Posts Offline | | Posted: April 7, 2010, 11:58 am - IP Logged | |
Well we can go a bunch of different ways here ... and I think this is where we would have to decide if this strategy is for the long haul run and just to have coverage, then picking the high ranking ones won't differ much whether the entire history is used or the last 100 games, because the same #'s will be in there. The problem would come when trying to narrow down the "right" power #'s if this were going to be a wheel in constant play. I'm not sure which I prefer, hence why no recent jackpot yet!!! If trying to create the wheel for spot play (meaning using those special "3-5" along with the currents for the next 3 draws) then any number of groups can work which brings us back to trying to create that killer pool; which from my experience means overlapping wheels pulling the numbers from a variety of charts (and just trying things). If you notice, on any given day one chart (let's say chart 4) can contain all 5 winners; and on other days you'll see 2 here, 2 somewhere else and maybe just 1 from another. My latest creation of 2 wheels is using this strategy, but has me in a holding pattern because I chose one power number for each wheel (example: my "10 & Friends") where 10 is the power number and its a matter of waiting for that group to show strong in the L10, then I'll pounce ... The idea being that these numbers will roll around and come together every so often because history has shown that it does, and so if patient (keep in mind this is a sort of base wheel and not the only one to play at any given time) a 4 out of 5 is pretty much guaranteed. As well as 3 of 5's. The ultimate 5 of 5 could come as well. I just don't want to be playing a wheel for what seems like forever so that even if a "4" does materialize it just barely pays back what was spent! Thats right with numbers scattered all over the charts. It's exactly the reason why I want to get away from that as there is no way to allow for all "good numbers" in play. It's sort of basing on facts. The facts are following : these are 2 or 3 best numbers in last 20 draws or so and these are their best pairings within a couple of last years. | | |
Las Vegas, NV United States Member #45283 August 9, 2006 1136 Posts Offline | | Posted: April 7, 2010, 12:05 pm - IP Logged | |
This is true. I'm also trying to narrow down which few charts to use on a "regular" basis and not bother with all the other ones because they just increase the size of the pool. Like being brave and just picking from charts 3, 4 & 6. Also spot checking chart 7 for locating the overall top rankers and where they currently are on chart 4. | | |
Krakow Poland Member #86326 February 2, 2010 445 Posts Offline | | Posted: April 7, 2010, 12:12 pm - IP Logged | |
This is true. I'm also trying to narrow down which few charts to use on a "regular" basis and not bother with all the other ones because they just increase the size of the pool. Like being brave and just picking from charts 3, 4 & 6. Also spot checking chart 7 for locating the overall top rankers and where they currently are on chart 4. Without very strict rules like: 15 numbers chosen at most it always ends up in 20 odd numbers. The other way of playing without so much guesswork would be choosing top rankin 2, 3 or 4 numbers with all their pairings and excluding all the numbers which have not come up with those favorites in say 50 or 100 games. However that would give us more numbers to wheel than the first option. | | |
Krakow Poland Member #86326 February 2, 2010 445 Posts Offline | | Posted: April 7, 2010, 12:47 pm - IP Logged | |
I got one question to all of you using A+. Have you ever tried using exclusively 1 chart for selecting numbers. Chart B with skips due. Say we set B4.1 to IN L5 and gamesout to 30 games. Then we select skips most due( higher skips with 0 and lower skips with max 1, except for skip o and 1 which maybe higher. | | |
Michigan United States Member #54649 August 8, 2007 115 Posts Offline | | Posted: April 8, 2010, 3:33 am - IP Logged | |
Hey There adamcustom, I like to use as many charts as I can. Focusing on short term 1st. As with all the short term, including the B chart, I want to see what direction the game is traveling; as in MI 5/39 I play. I already know where it's been hence past draws. What I'm looking for is a Bias on the TOT & AVG columns. I look to see if those two columns are above or below the mean as decribed on pg. 43 of the LMG. A far as B41 chart. If I see the game is leaning out more cold, I'll try setting the L setting to 20 and the games out to 20. I feeling that gives me pretty good coverage for the 17 games out. I'm not to concerned going back any farther than that because of the trend reversal stuff that occurs on 4 chart. If I feel the game is leaning more hot, then I'll leave the settings on B41 at the defult, and cross reference other charts to see if there's corralation with B & B41. L J | | |
Krakow Poland Member #86326 February 2, 2010 445 Posts Offline | | Posted: April 8, 2010, 6:41 am - IP Logged | |
Hey There adamcustom, I like to use as many charts as I can. Focusing on short term 1st. As with all the short term, including the B chart, I want to see what direction the game is traveling; as in MI 5/39 I play. I already know where it's been hence past draws. What I'm looking for is a Bias on the TOT & AVG columns. I look to see if those two columns are above or below the mean as decribed on pg. 43 of the LMG. A far as B41 chart. If I see the game is leaning out more cold, I'll try setting the L setting to 20 and the games out to 20. I feeling that gives me pretty good coverage for the 17 games out. I'm not to concerned going back any farther than that because of the trend reversal stuff that occurs on 4 chart. If I feel the game is leaning more hot, then I'll leave the settings on B41 at the defult, and cross reference other charts to see if there's corralation with B & B41. L J Thanks L J1 for your answer. Adam | | |
Michigan United States Member #54649 August 8, 2007 115 Posts Offline | | Posted: April 11, 2010, 9:54 am - IP Logged | |
Your Welcome Adam. The B Chart is such a great indicator to work with. When you see a considerable amount of difference in the recent dynamics of the game, the B Chart along with it's F4 screens can assist in the direction of the next set of winning numbers. | | |
Krakow Poland Member #86326 February 2, 2010 445 Posts Offline | | Posted: April 22, 2010, 6:55 am - IP Logged | |
Xmatrix, I wonder what kind of help you expect if you consistently select right numbers in a pool of 10 or 12. It's a luxury problem. Then I would wheel them 4 of 5 at least. Adam | | |
Broken Arrow Oklahoma United States Member #85747 January 21, 2010 86 Posts Offline | | Posted: April 23, 2010, 5:52 pm - IP Logged | |
Hey I'll take the GH plus. I have lottobuster and it helps but those winning numbers slide off like a greasy worm. I'm still trying after all these years. But one hit and pow! I am off to visit Switzerland. Home, home where I wanted to be. | | |
Krakow Poland Member #86326 February 2, 2010 445 Posts Offline | | Posted: May 10, 2010, 4:55 am - IP Logged | |
Is it the case that all ags been said and done? It seems that the thread is exhausted. Adam | | |
Monkey Butt, USA United States Member #55038 August 23, 2007 1120 Posts Offline | | Posted: May 10, 2010, 1:25 pm - IP Logged | |
Is it the case that all ags been said and done? It seems that the thread is exhausted. Adam Yes, it does seem that way. I have to admit that I've learned quite a bit since this tread has started and although I've not posted a lot, I've started looking at every feature in the software so that I can pass it on. I've earnestly started using my software to track pick 3 and pick 4 here in TX. Still inputting the data from 1993 to present. I am also inputting the pick 3 and pick 4 lotto information as vtrac. I hope to post something useful for all Smart Luck Advantage Plus users before this thread expires. | | |
|