All times shown are Eastern Time (GMT-5:00) | Home -> Forums -> Lottery Discussion -> Your State Now Having Both Powerball And Mega Millions Your State Now Having Both Powerball And Mega MillionsPrevious TopicNext TopicIllinois United States Member #82530 November 3, 2009 850 Posts Offline | | Posted: February 3, 2010, 8:20 pm - IP Logged | |
kinda disappointed that pot isn't getting any bigger. PB went from 107 to 115 since Sunday but was expecting increments to be more especailly on a 100 m pot. Maybe need to do more advertising fro casual players. | | |
nashville n.c. United States Member #78960 August 14, 2009 1508 Posts Offline | | Posted: February 3, 2010, 8:26 pm - IP Logged | |
N.C. just got mm this week. The first draw i bought a qp with megaplier..nothing..lol..So, i wont be playing that again until the jackpot is higher and powerball i rarely play anyways..So it wont affect my spending habits that much at all.. I'll stick with pick 3 and 4 | | |
New Jersey United States Member #21537 September 4, 2005 850 Posts Offline | | Posted: February 3, 2010, 8:51 pm - IP Logged | |
I live on a border, and have always had the option of playing either or both. I'm about 8 miles from the border. I play them based on their cash expectation value, meaning I tend to play less Powerball because the odds are longer and the cash/annuity ratio is much lower. I play powerball when it's over 50M annuity, and Megamillions when it's over $35M annuity. I will continue to do the same. I hope that both games will continue and that any national game will be an additional game. If they try to make a game that has something like 1 in 600,000,000 odds, I will almost certainly be free of the already irrational scourge of playing the lottery if they cancel MM and PB at the same time. | | |
Indiana United States Member #49185 January 7, 2007 1770 Posts Offline | | Posted: February 3, 2010, 10:03 pm - IP Logged | |
kinda disappointed that pot isn't getting any bigger. PB went from 107 to 115 since Sunday but was expecting increments to be more especailly on a 100 m pot. Maybe need to do more advertising fro casual players. Up to now, Powerball's jackpot has rarely been updated. This is a rare event but because there are a lot more players this drawing, the jackpot was increased from $107M to $115M. Also, the jackpot amount is estimated, it's not an exact amount. The jackpot amount advertised is no indication that the jackpot isn't getting bigger. For example, the record Mega Millions jackpot was estimated and advertised to be $370M, but when all was said and done, it had actually went to $390M. Gonna win. | | |
Indiana United States Member #49185 January 7, 2007 1770 Posts Offline | | Posted: February 3, 2010, 11:22 pm - IP Logged | |
See that. $116M. Gonna win. | | |
United States Member #32929 February 12, 2006 487 Posts Offline | | Posted: February 4, 2010, 2:20 am - IP Logged | |
i see your 116m, and rise you 140m! , even thro, am guesting it be much more then 140m by the end of the draw they sure are being very conservative with their jackpots numbers , they just dont know how many tickets they will sell with these 10 new states added in yet i bet you we could see 150m jackpot update near the the draw sense MM down for the count atm"low jackpot" ,pb, now your time take all our money for your self! rofl | | |
Kentucky United States Member #33045 February 14, 2006 2812 Posts Offline | | Posted: February 4, 2010, 11:35 am - IP Logged | |
Illinois has had Mega Millions and added Powerball. We haven't heard a thing yet about the Megaplier but I'm thinking it might have to happen just to compete. Right now the MM jackpoot is $15,000,000 and the PB is $115,000,000. The buck that would have went to MM will become the Powerplay on the PB. Let's see, oh my head the pain.....$15 vs $115 million, and $250,000 for 5 + 0 vs $1,000,000. Kind of a no brainer. I realize there is that element that can't pass up a drawing and has to be "in action" regarldess of the jackpots, and either way the odds are astronomical, but right now PB is a lot more "bang for the buck". Powerplay and Megaplier only affect the secondary prizes and since each state lottery is responsible for secondary prize payoffs, it may take some time until each state lottery has that option. It's going to be interesting to see if the lotteries get increased revenues by adding the extra high jackpot game or will it be about the same after their other games show a decline in play. "Let's see, oh my head the pain.....$15 vs $115 million, and $250,000 for 5 + 0 vs $1,000,000." Compare matching 5 numbers to playing your lottery's 6/49 game with cash values under $2 million. Even if the price of the ticket is $2, we're still playing for a cool million in every drawing. | | |
Kentucky United States Member #33045 February 14, 2006 2812 Posts Offline | | Posted: February 4, 2010, 11:46 am - IP Logged | |
Up to now, Powerball's jackpot has rarely been updated. This is a rare event but because there are a lot more players this drawing, the jackpot was increased from $107M to $115M. Also, the jackpot amount is estimated, it's not an exact amount. The jackpot amount advertised is no indication that the jackpot isn't getting bigger. For example, the record Mega Millions jackpot was estimated and advertised to be $370M, but when all was said and done, it had actually went to $390M. because it's going to be difficult estimating how much will be played in the new states. Within a couple months the estimate will be closer to the actual prize. Had MM estimated the jackpot at $400 million and the payoff was $390 million, eyebrows would be raised. Both MM and PB probably use lower estimates so players won't question where the rest of the money went.
| | |
Zeta Reticuli Star System United States Member #30849 January 17, 2006 6989 Posts Offline | | Posted: February 4, 2010, 1:07 pm - IP Logged | |
Anyone else wondering if this all isn't a marketing test for an upcoming "LOTTO USA"? I'd love to see that, but hatre to think of the matrix. It's Lotto, not horseshoes or artillery! Close doesn't count! I sell everything at a loss but make up for it in volume - Milo Minderbinder, Catch-22 There are two kinds of jackpot winners...the ones who remained anonymous and the ones that wish they had.
| | |
Tennessee United States Member #8005 October 15, 2004 11329 Posts Offline | | Posted: February 4, 2010, 1:11 pm - IP Logged | |
Anyone else wondering if this all isn't a marketing test for an upcoming "LOTTO USA"? I'd love to see that, but hatre to think of the matrix. i was thinking that myself.they'll eventually merge into one huge lotto USA type of game or something down the line.there also might be a chance that eventually both games would want to go back to their respective states if things don't pan out.when i first heard that all the states were going to have both games i wondered why they tried this.i like that they did it but i wondered why they didn't do it sooner..... | | |
Ridge Runner - Oracle of the Appalachians Way back up in them hills, son United States Member #74415 April 28, 2009 8431 Posts Online | | Posted: February 4, 2010, 1:25 pm - IP Logged | |
I don't think the matrix would be the biggest problem with a national lotto game. I'm just afraid it'll be like the national healthcare plan where you have to participate or you get fined and thrown in prison. I would hate that. . The water ain't never gonna run clear til you get the pigs out of the creek. | | |
NY United States Member #24178 October 16, 2005 2127 Posts Offline | | Posted: February 4, 2010, 1:53 pm - IP Logged | |
It seems to me that you left out the most obvious and sensible choice: play whichever one has a bigger jackpot. If they're both really big I might play them both, but for the most part I'll just choose the bigger jackpot, though I'll probably also figure the odds into the decision. I'm roughly 10% more likely to win MM, so unless PB is at least 10% more there's no sensible reason to choose PB over MM. | | |
New Jersey United States Member #72153 March 1, 2009 201 Posts Offline | | Posted: February 4, 2010, 2:04 pm - IP Logged | |
I am going to play both equally. I like the idea too, now I can get my hopes up 4 times a week instead of 2 . "Bless me Lord, so that I may be a blessing to others."
| | |
Indiana United States Member #49185 January 7, 2007 1770 Posts Offline | | Posted: February 4, 2010, 6:41 pm - IP Logged | |
I think I'll have more fun playing the lottery with more drawings per week. Gonna win. | | |
Draws in More than One Way Northern Virginia United States Member #83896 December 5, 2009 868 Posts Offline | | Posted: February 4, 2010, 7:01 pm - IP Logged | |
My permanent address is in Virginia and I am studying in Georgia, both of which have both games now. I have no intention of playing either game on any kind of frequent basis because the payouts for the lower prizes are completely unfair. I might play one of the two if the jackpot gets very high, though. If I do play, I invariably pick the Pick 3 because it is much easier to win the top prize and the payouts are completely fair. Unless I state otherwise, I am referring to numbers in straight order. I cannot predict lottery numbers, except that there will be no winning number tomorrow in Nevada. In a lot of states, lotteries benefit education. That makes the REAL winners the only people who can't play! | | |
|