You last visited May 21, 2013, 12:57 pm All times shown are Eastern Time (GMT-5:00) | PICK 4,5,6 Cracked - New Systemnassau Bahamas Member #103482 January 2, 2011 3407 Posts Offline | | Posted: November 18, 2011, 6:37 pm - IP Logged | |
9-11-24-26-28 9-11-24-26-? you cover 10 4 hit combinations from the pool of 376,992 lines 9-11-24-?-28 you cover 3 4 hit combinations from the pool of 376,992 lines 9-11-?-25-28 you cover 14 4 hit combinations from the pool of 376,992 lines 9-?-24-25-28 you cover 14 4 hit combinations from the pool of 376,992 lines ?-11-24-25-28 you cover 10 4 hit combinations from the pool of 376,992 lines
9-11-24-?-? you cover 66 3 hit combinations from the pool of 376,992 lines 9-11-?-26-? you cover 140 3 hit combinations from the pool of 376,992 lines 9-11-?-?-28 you cover 120 3 hit combinations from the pool of 376,992 lines 9-?-11-26-? you cover 140 3 hit combinations from the pool of 376,992 lines Just playing about to see if I can find better 3 hit ratios 01 ? 26 ? 36 then you cover 216 combinations contain this combination in these positions:: 01 ? 25 ? 36 then you cover 230 combinations contain this combination in these positions:: 01 ? 24 ? 36 then you cover 242 combinations contain this combination in these positions:: 01 ? 23 ? 36 then you cover 252 combinations contain this combination in these positions:: 01 ? 22 ? 36 then you cover 260 combinations contain this combination in these positions:: 01 ? 21 ? 36 then you cover 266 combinations contain this combination in these positions:: 01 ? 20 ? 36 then you cover 270 combinations contain this combination in these positions:: 01 ? 19 ? 36 then you cover 272 combinations contain this combination in these positions:: 01 ? 18 ? 36 then you cover 272 combinations contain this combination in these positions:: 01 ? 17 ? 36 then you cover 270 combinations contain this combination in these positions:: 01 ? 16 ? 36 then you cover 266 combinations contain this combination in these positions:
? ? 31 32 35 then you cover 435 combinations: ? ? 31 35 36 then you cover 465 combinations: ? ? 32 35 36 then you cover 465 combinations: ? ? 33 35 36 then you cover 496 combinations: ? ? 34 35 36 then you cover 528 combinations: 01 02 ? ? 36 then you cover 528 combinations: So I would suggest putting on 01 02 34 35 36 to maximize hitting 3 of 6 I would do more but apart from the calculations I have to enter all by hand at the moment, I will get the interface finished soon and I will be able to perform a full scan off all possibles. thanks | | |
Illinois United States Member #99800 October 31, 2010 679 Posts Offline | | Posted: November 18, 2011, 6:56 pm - IP Logged | |
7 20 28 32 36 7 20 28 32 45 46 | | |
BOSTON United States Member #48 September 9, 2001 2857 Posts Offline | | Posted: November 18, 2011, 8:18 pm - IP Logged | |
how about a 4 number pick from 0 to 9 In mass today miday was 9632 and eve was 8699 Wha t to play tomorrow | | |
BOSTON United States Member #48 September 9, 2001 2857 Posts Offline | | Posted: November 18, 2011, 8:58 pm - IP Logged | |
would your theory become simpler to figure out say in a lottery such as Mass. cash which is a 5/35 lottery I am thinking less numbers to work with. What do you think? | | |
BOSTON United States Member #48 September 9, 2001 2857 Posts Offline | | Posted: November 18, 2011, 9:02 pm - IP Logged | |
P.S. an example; here is last draw results. 4 7 22 26 32 | | |
mid-Ohio United States Member #9 March 24, 2001 15943 Posts Online | | Posted: November 19, 2011, 12:20 pm - IP Logged | |
Where are the winning tickets that prove the claims are true? If you haven't won a game then you haven't cracked it. * The fundamentals of winning a lottery jackpot * * play a lottery you can win *
| | |
Somerset United Kingdom Member #9889 December 17, 2004 170 Posts Offline | | Posted: November 19, 2011, 8:30 pm - IP Logged | |
Where are the winning tickets that prove the claims are true? If you haven't won a game then you haven't cracked it. I don't think you quite comprehend the notion of what I have created. I now have the ability to create a rank systems for numbers and their possible combinations and tell how to best place them on tickets. For example Take the combination 1 10 20 30 ? ? where ? = yet unknown numbers I can tell you that this has 171 to 1 chance of appearing in a 6/49 draw in these positions However the same numbers but put on a ticket like so 1 10 20 ? ? 30 has just 36 to 1 chance of appearing in these positions Yes you hit 3 either way but the % chance of hitting the 5th ball changes from the way you have arranged the 4 balls. I hope I am getting this concept across. Now the above is just one equation of about 50 that would need to be performed on 3 balls, 4 balls and 5 balls to give a rank of the hit ratio probability. So as another example let's say you have 11 numbers you use every week. I can take these 11 numbers run them through this system and I can see the best way to arrange these 11 numbers on the tickets to maximize the possibility of 3 combination wins, 4 ball combination wins and 5 ball combination wins based on every possible combination in the draw. I am trying to say this as simply as possible, so what this system does is calculate the best places to put the numbers on the tickets to maximize hits, it does not pick numbers for you, you pick your numbers and put into the system which in turn tells you how to maximize possible hits by arranging the numbers on the tickets. It does not predict numbers, this system is purely mathematics used to best arrange numbers. No system in the world until now could do this, It has taken my computer two years to produce this working algorithm. If a mathematician is reading this then I have no doubt they would appreciate the implications this has to a lottery player. To mention a few 1: Producing tickets that contain numbers in positions that are mathematically most likely to happen. 2: Producing mathematically perfect wheels. 3: Optimizing percentages of hitting more numbers. 4: A solid model to reference research against. It has been said every software has a bug in it, it has also been said that every program can be reduced by one line of code. There for any program can be reduced to 1 line that dont work. | | |
nassau Bahamas Member #103482 January 2, 2011 3407 Posts Offline | | Posted: November 19, 2011, 8:41 pm - IP Logged | |
I don't think you quite comprehend the notion of what I have created. I now have the ability to create a rank systems for numbers and their possible combinations and tell how to best place them on tickets. For example Take the combination 1 10 20 30 ? ? where ? = yet unknown numbers I can tell you that this has 171 to 1 chance of appearing in a 6/49 draw in these positions However the same numbers but put on a ticket like so 1 10 20 ? ? 30 has just 36 to 1 chance of appearing in these positions Yes you hit 3 either way but the % chance of hitting the 5th ball changes from the way you have arranged the 4 balls. I hope I am getting this concept across. Now the above is just one equation of about 50 that would need to be performed on 3 balls, 4 balls and 5 balls to give a rank of the hit ratio probability. So as another example let's say you have 11 numbers you use every week. I can take these 11 numbers run them through this system and I can see the best way to arrange these 11 numbers on the tickets to maximize the possibility of 3 combination wins, 4 ball combination wins and 5 ball combination wins based on every possible combination in the draw. I am trying to say this as simply as possible, so what this system does is calculate the best places to put the numbers on the tickets to maximize hits, it does not pick numbers for you, you pick your numbers and put into the system which in turn tells you how to maximize possible hits by arranging the numbers on the tickets. It does not predict numbers, this system is purely mathematics used to best arrange numbers. No system in the world until now could do this, It has taken my computer two years to produce this working algorithm. If a mathematician is reading this then I have no doubt they would appreciate the implications this has to a lottery player. To mention a few 1: Producing tickets that contain numbers in positions that are mathematically most likely to happen. 2: Producing mathematically perfect wheels. 3: Optimizing percentages of hitting more numbers. 4: A solid model to reference research against. 01 04 16 29 30 came in Fantasy 5 last night ...How long do I keep your numbers? | | |
Somerset United Kingdom Member #9889 December 17, 2004 170 Posts Offline | | Posted: November 19, 2011, 8:45 pm - IP Logged | |
Let me explain how deep this goes and maybe you will understand why it has taken so long to work this out. A normal distribution for a 6/49 draw is a fixed bell curve. If you remove say number 35 the distribution becomes completely different. Put 35 back in the pool and takeout let's say 45, again the distribution is completely different from taking out ball 35 even though you still have 5 balls left in both instances. Every time a number is added or removed the odds change and change differently according to the balls removed. My system can work these odds out and do so on hundreds of tickets. It has been said every software has a bug in it, it has also been said that every program can be reduced by one line of code. There for any program can be reduced to 1 line that dont work. | | |
Somerset United Kingdom Member #9889 December 17, 2004 170 Posts Offline | | Posted: November 19, 2011, 9:25 pm - IP Logged | |
01 04 16 29 30 came in Fantasy 5 last night ...How long do I keep your numbers? I will get the interface working so I can do a complete scan and provide you with some better numbers. Remember that those numbers were only taken from a very small sample as I had to enter the combinations by hand. It does prove concept though, the ball that matched landed in the positon predicted, even if it was ball 1. The last draw breakdown 01 04 16 ? ? appears 190 times in this order 01 04 ? 29 ? appears 168 times in this order 01 04 ? ? 30 appears 300 times in this order 01 ? 16 29 ? appears 98 times in this order 01 ? 16 ? 30 appears 168 times in this order 01 ? ? 29 30 appears 351 times in this order ? 04 16 29 ? appears 21 times in this order ? 04 16 ? 30 appears 39 times in this order ? 04 ? 29 30 appears 72 times in this order ? ? 16 29 30 appears 105 times in this order Thats all the 3's now the 4's 01 04 16 29 ? appears 7 times in this order 01 04 16 ? 30 appears 13 times in this order 01 04 ? 29 30 appears 24 times in this order 01 ? 16 29 30 appears 14 times in this order ? 04 16 29 30 appears 3 times in this order Thats all the 4's now the 5 01 04 16 29 30 appears 1 time in this order ( as the odds of the draw suggests 1 in 376,992) Note the bias in the middle selections, they are higher which is intresting, something for me to look into...... I would need to analyse the entire draw history as I have analysed the numbers above and plot some trend lines using the findings from the data to get a prediction from it. It has been said every software has a bug in it, it has also been said that every program can be reduced by one line of code. There for any program can be reduced to 1 line that dont work. | | |
usa United States Member #89225 April 2, 2010 2344 Posts Offline | | Posted: November 19, 2011, 9:33 pm - IP Logged | |
| | |
NYC United States Member #54952 August 20, 2007 447 Posts Offline | | Posted: November 19, 2011, 9:47 pm - IP Logged | |
Let me explain how deep this goes and maybe you will understand why it has taken so long to work this out. A normal distribution for a 6/49 draw is a fixed bell curve. If you remove say number 35 the distribution becomes completely different. Put 35 back in the pool and takeout let's say 45, again the distribution is completely different from taking out ball 35 even though you still have 5 balls left in both instances. Every time a number is added or removed the odds change and change differently according to the balls removed. My system can work these odds out and do so on hundreds of tickets. Jamie, I have used your LSA_6 more than 4 months but nothing until now. Also I have asked many questions for you about LSA's using. Unfortunately, I have not yet found any useful and valuable information about using LSA on your website, post and blog until now. For example, lot of members of LSA asked for you to write some strategies about using LSA step by step and you have agreeded to do that 4 months ago. But nothing until now, why? I think that you always seem to be in with members around in circles, and always avoid answering with substantial topics and the actual operations about LSA. Why??? Best regards, lb | | |
mid-Ohio United States Member #9 March 24, 2001 15943 Posts Online | | Posted: November 19, 2011, 10:08 pm - IP Logged | |
I don't think you quite comprehend the notion of what I have created. I now have the ability to create a rank systems for numbers and their possible combinations and tell how to best place them on tickets. For example Take the combination 1 10 20 30 ? ? where ? = yet unknown numbers I can tell you that this has 171 to 1 chance of appearing in a 6/49 draw in these positions However the same numbers but put on a ticket like so 1 10 20 ? ? 30 has just 36 to 1 chance of appearing in these positions Yes you hit 3 either way but the % chance of hitting the 5th ball changes from the way you have arranged the 4 balls. I hope I am getting this concept across. Now the above is just one equation of about 50 that would need to be performed on 3 balls, 4 balls and 5 balls to give a rank of the hit ratio probability. So as another example let's say you have 11 numbers you use every week. I can take these 11 numbers run them through this system and I can see the best way to arrange these 11 numbers on the tickets to maximize the possibility of 3 combination wins, 4 ball combination wins and 5 ball combination wins based on every possible combination in the draw. I am trying to say this as simply as possible, so what this system does is calculate the best places to put the numbers on the tickets to maximize hits, it does not pick numbers for you, you pick your numbers and put into the system which in turn tells you how to maximize possible hits by arranging the numbers on the tickets. It does not predict numbers, this system is purely mathematics used to best arrange numbers. No system in the world until now could do this, It has taken my computer two years to produce this working algorithm. If a mathematician is reading this then I have no doubt they would appreciate the implications this has to a lottery player. To mention a few 1: Producing tickets that contain numbers in positions that are mathematically most likely to happen. 2: Producing mathematically perfect wheels. 3: Optimizing percentages of hitting more numbers. 4: A solid model to reference research against. I comprehend in order for any group of numbers to win, they all have to be drawn at the same time. When I compare 1,10,20 and 30 with 1,2,3 and 4 with the 756 Ohio Classic(649) drawinings, they've haven't done any better. 09/29/08 -01 03 19 20 30 46 07/23/07 - 10 12 20 29 30 38 07/24/10 - 01 03 04 05 26 47 04/05/08 -02 03 04 08 11 24 12/12/07 -01 03 04 07 09 44
You're going to have to actual win a game for me to think you've cracked anything. * The fundamentals of winning a lottery jackpot * * play a lottery you can win *
| | |
Somerset United Kingdom Member #9889 December 17, 2004 170 Posts Offline | | Posted: November 19, 2011, 10:30 pm - IP Logged | |
LSA is lottery tool that provides very advanced statistics on draws, what I want to avoid is marketing LSA as a "lotto system" which it is not, LSA is a tool for lotteries like a calculator is a tool for maths. lot of members of LSA asked for you to write some strategies about using LSA step by step and you have agreeded to do that 4 months ago. But nothing until now, why I have added a number of entries in my blog as members have asked, I have also made it clear if anyone wants help or me to cover something found in LSA then email me and I will do so What I don't want to do and wont do is write things like "how to pick your winning numbers", I may well sell a load more doing this but I am running the risk of marketing LSA as a system which is not my intention and never has been. Also understand LSA is not my day job, it's a project I enjoy spending time on as I enjoy numbers and playing the lottery, It helps me unwind from my demanding day job coding various systems for planes. I will continue to develop and improve LSA making it analysis more and more real world statistics that can not be found anywhere else. I play numbers each week and I want to know I am playing the best numbers possible and so should all lotto players. I am happy to help anyone out using LSA and even make a video for them, simply PM me. Regards Jamie It has been said every software has a bug in it, it has also been said that every program can be reduced by one line of code. There for any program can be reduced to 1 line that dont work. | | |
Somerset United Kingdom Member #9889 December 17, 2004 170 Posts Offline | | Posted: November 19, 2011, 10:37 pm - IP Logged | |
I comprehend in order for any group of numbers to win, they all have to be drawn at the same time. When I compare 1,10,20 and 30 with 1,2,3 and 4 with the 756 Ohio Classic(649) drawinings, they've haven't done any better. 09/29/08 -01 03 19 20 30 46 07/23/07 - 10 12 20 29 30 38 07/24/10 - 01 03 04 05 26 47 04/05/08 -02 03 04 08 11 24 12/12/07 -01 03 04 07 09 44
You're going to have to actual win a game for me to think you've cracked anything. I comprehend in order for any group of numbers to win, they all have to be drawn at the same time. Absolutely When I compare 1,10,20 and 30 with 1,2,3 and 4 with the 756 Ohio Classic(649) drawinings, they've haven't done any better. I would be surprised if they did do better, your sample is so small, try comparing to the draws entire set of combinations and the stats become apparent. I am looking at the whole picture or the global statistics if you like, not past draw data. It has been said every software has a bug in it, it has also been said that every program can be reduced by one line of code. There for any program can be reduced to 1 line that dont work. | | |
|