PICK 4,5,6 Cracked - New System

Hey RL when I saw the third column area, LEXI was the first thought. You have thrown so much GOOD STUFF here on the forums and my way, I credit you with the charts and whatnot. Those resulted in trying to understand what you were doing and catch up. I think you have a better understanding on what Developer is doing, so I'm interested in your thoughts.

Last night I ran the data for the triples. This morning I realized the program was closing the file before it completed the cycle through X, X, 37. It is corrected and running again. But not knowing if, or how much of the data is corrupt, it will have to wait.

Big question RL what are your thoughts on positioning 4 balls in a 5 ball game?  Using 4 set numbers you only have 33 combinations in a 37 ball matrix, 35 in a 39 ball matrix. Thinking of running it out, but it will take a ton of time.

Okay, dr san, that idea is not in my sights at the moment. It seems reasonable and achievable using historical data containing a few 1000 draws, but on the global scale it would be a huge undertaking. I wouldn't do it just from looking at the sheer size of the data pool. Currently, we are working with 435,897 numerically arranged permutations that account for every possible draw that could come out. It would be a step back, to use draw order combinations 1/37(1st ball)*1/36(2nd ball)*1/35(3rd ball)*1/34(4th ball)*1/33(last ball). Using that pool you go from searching 435,897 permutations to searching 52,307,640. I agree with RJOH "numbers are going to come out of the terminal in numerical order."

Jadelottery, I have about a page of ideas on projecting numbers off this, but nothing concrete on what might be around the corner. What do you think we should look at?

Developer, Thanks for giving us the opportunity to look into this. As I said earlier, it is not an easy chore to work through an idea, make the data mean something,  but to take the time to write it up and post it is going the extra mile.

Hi

Thank you for encouraging comments,I am pleased to see users are understanding what I have had my PC running for two years to work out.

As for getting an exe out, give me a few weeks to make a user understandable interface and I will send anyone copy that wants it.

One problem is that the app is currently 197mb, it may shrink somewhat when compiled into an installer but it won't be by much. It is a very big algorithm, and has to be to take into account all combinations in all draws from a 6/49 down.

it currently covers around 100 different jackpot games worldwide but I have not tested them to prove this, I am testing on the Euro Millions and UK Lotto at this time.

Jamie

Hey RL when I saw the third column area, LEXI was the first thought. You have thrown so much GOOD STUFF here on the forums and my way, I credit you with the charts and whatnot. Those resulted in trying to understand what you were doing and catch up. I think you have a better understanding on what Developer is doing, so I'm interested in your thoughts.

Last night I ran the data for the triples. This morning I realized the program was closing the file before it completed the cycle through X, X, 37. It is corrected and running again. But not knowing if, or how much of the data is corrupt, it will have to wait.

Big question RL what are your thoughts on positioning 4 balls in a 5 ball game?  Using 4 set numbers you only have 33 combinations in a 37 ball matrix, 35 in a 39 ball matrix. Thinking of running it out, but it will take a ton of time.

Okay, dr san, that idea is not in my sights at the moment. It seems reasonable and achievable using historical data containing a few 1000 draws, but on the global scale it would be a huge undertaking. I wouldn't do it just from looking at the sheer size of the data pool. Currently, we are working with 435,897 numerically arranged permutations that account for every possible draw that could come out. It would be a step back, to use draw order combinations 1/37(1st ball)*1/36(2nd ball)*1/35(3rd ball)*1/34(4th ball)*1/33(last ball). Using that pool you go from searching 435,897 permutations to searching 52,307,640. I agree with RJOH "numbers are going to come out of the terminal in numerical order."

Jadelottery, I have about a page of ideas on projecting numbers off this, but nothing concrete on what might be around the corner. What do you think we should look at?

Developer, Thanks for giving us the opportunity to look into this. As I said earlier, it is not an easy chore to work through an idea, make the data mean something,  but to take the time to write it up and post it is going the extra mile.

"Developer" - for future reference, it is probably best not to create a thread titled "PICK 4,5,6 Cracked - New System" when you haven't cracked anything. I can assure you, that you will receive a better response from the members here at LP. You know, as the rest of us know, that nothing was "cracked" here by your findings. In the lotto game, the word "cracked" implies that you have a found a way of beating the system, thus resulting in profit.
It looks foolish to say you cracked the lotto  when you just created a way of analyzing numbr positioning by frequency.

But anyways, good luck to you. There is nothing wrong with a person trying to find ways to help increase odds, but your title is misleading & way off.

I agree B$Rizzle. Cracked means you found a way to beat the lottery. Obviously you didn't. 

"Developer" - for future reference, it is probably best not to create a thread titled "PICK 4,5,6 Cracked - New System" when you haven't cracked anything. I can assure you, that you will receive a better response from the members here at LP. You know, as the rest of us know, that nothing was "cracked" here by your findings. In the lotto game, the word "cracked" implies that you have a found a way of beating the system, thus resulting in profit.
It looks foolish to say you cracked the lotto  when you just created a way of analyzing numbr positioning by frequency.

But anyways, good luck to you. There is nothing wrong with a person trying to find ways to help increase odds, but your title is misleading & way off.

Don't be too hard on him, he's not the first to have an eureka moment that once shared didn't seem so great.  I've had a few that went that way too so now I just keep them to myself but if one ever results in me winning a lottery jackpot or second prize in the MM or PB games I will share it.

I tested this on last nights florida 5-36 and ohio 5-39 games, Pics below show results

FL 5-36

Ohio 5-39

RL

Don't be too hard on him, he's not the first to have an eureka moment that once shared didn't seem so great.

It seems great to me, I can analyse any possibly combination in any possible position then compare against any combination in any jackpot draw on the planet in a few seconds.

I thinks that's an impressive feat even for the best mathematician.