All times shown are Eastern Time (GMT-5:00) | Would you share your winning lottery system if you had one ?KEEP YOUR EYE ON THE BALL! NYC United States Member #124503 March 14, 2012 5037 Posts Offline | | Posted: May 18, 2012, 10:28 pm - IP Logged | |
Another thing it reminds me of is playing match @tntea...i dont quite understand what you mean by this sentence... could you elaborate? | | |
United States Member #5437 June 30, 2004 23638 Posts Offline | | Posted: May 18, 2012, 10:30 pm - IP Logged | |
Another thing it reminds me of is playing match @tntea...i dont quite understand what you mean by this sentence... could you elaborate? Not without giving away how I do it. 
| | |
New Mexico United States Member #59006 February 18, 2008 683 Posts Offline | | Posted: May 18, 2012, 10:48 pm - IP Logged | |
I'm still looking for someone who has a winning system with few numbers to play, but still can't find that, it's hard to make money if you play 30 numbers or more a day !!! I mean would you share your winning lottery system if you had one ? Thanks I understand your question, and I certainly don't want to be rude, but if I had a winning system I wouldn't share it with people who come on this forum and beg others for a system. I'm not saying that's what you're doing, but trust me, we get that a lot around here. Someone who is fairly new will make a post asking for a winning system. My advice to you is stay awhile....kick off your shoes, roll up your sleeves and get involved. There are plenty of members here who work HARD. They work hard and they've done so for a long time. They work to come up with new systems, tweak old systems, and even just come up with ideas for systems. Work with them. Contribute. Why would anyone with a winning system give it away? I've actually had people PM me asking if I can help them win Mega Millions. Seriously? 176 Million to 1 and you expect me to just hand over the winning numbers? If I could win Mega Millions, I surely wouldn't be wasting much time here....I would be getting numbers together and filling out bet slips I can guarantee that. Anyway, sorry about the rant. Just get involved and read some of the countless posts about things that work or things that have worked in the past. I believe no system (at least that I know of) will produce winners everyday. It takes patience and persistence and.....work. So, no, I wouldn't share a winning system with everybody, but there are members on this forum that I've never met that I would share it with. Why? Because they contribute. | | |
mid-Ohio United States Member #9 March 24, 2001 15962 Posts Offline | | Posted: May 18, 2012, 11:28 pm - IP Logged | |
If they are play 50 cent box.. they need to move on over to p4. The payout is higher and nicer... 
Personally I don't care for either game because of their daily drawings which makes keeping their data files updated a lot of work. Besides, their payouts aren't life changing. Jackpot games with two or three drawings per week are more my speed since there's time between drawings to think about my next move. * The fundamentals of winning a lottery jackpot * * play a lottery you can win *
| | |
mid-Ohio United States Member #9 March 24, 2001 15962 Posts Offline | | Posted: May 18, 2012, 11:46 pm - IP Logged | |
I now understand your logic in proprietary claims... I would only share my system to people i have actually spoke to on the phone...or who have similar charts as i do...who see the numbers the same way as i do...and who live in a different state or country as a i do... i would be curious as to what your programs look like...would you be willing to post a screenshot of one of your programs? i would be curious as to what your programs look like...would you be willing to post a screenshot of one of your programs? Why would anyone want to post a screenshot of a program they had no interest in sharing? * The fundamentals of winning a lottery jackpot * * play a lottery you can win *
| | |
Canada Member #52051 April 15, 2007 188 Posts Offline
| | Posted: May 19, 2012, 12:03 am - IP Logged | |
I would have to agree with Texas MadMan, alot of people here, just like me work very hard to come up with new systems, so don't expect a member to share his secret to you just like that, nevertheless i can tell Botip that you want some fast money, but nothing in life is free, believe me. But i'm willing to give you a couple of tips and strategies i've been using, just PM me. | | |
Aruba Member #123712 February 27, 2012 1799 Posts Online | | Posted: May 19, 2012, 5:58 am - IP Logged | |
I'm still looking for someone who has a winning system with few numbers to play, but still can't find that, it's hard to make money if you play 30 numbers or more a day !!! Systems and tips were sold against hard cash in the gambling world. A roulette system could easily be sold for 400 and much more. I suppose that a good lotterysystem is worth thousands. | | |
williamson county United States Member #119097 November 14, 2011 1218 Posts Offline | | Posted: May 19, 2012, 10:34 am - IP Logged | |
If they are play 50 cent box.. they need to move on over to p4. The payout is higher and nicer... 
if it were not for cash 3 players the lottery would not be making money........biggest rip off there is......everyone thinks that picking 3 number is so much easier than picking 4 numbers.....i have to disagree big time.... | | |
United States Member #5437 June 30, 2004 23638 Posts Offline | | Posted: May 19, 2012, 11:00 am - IP Logged | |
I'm still looking for someone who has a winning system with few numbers to play, but still can't find that, it's hard to make money if you play 30 numbers or more a day !!! Systems and tips were sold against hard cash in the gambling world. A roulette system could easily be sold for 400 and much more. I suppose that a good lotterysystem is worth thousands. Instead of looking for someone with a winning system... Why not just look for the winning system? It takes hours of studying your states number to see what is happening... Do the work.. it will be worth it. | | |
United States Member #5437 June 30, 2004 23638 Posts Offline | | Posted: May 19, 2012, 11:03 am - IP Logged | |
if it were not for cash 3 players the lottery would not be making money........biggest rip off there is......everyone thinks that picking 3 number is so much easier than picking 4 numbers.....i have to disagree big time.... It take me longer with workouts to find the p3 number to play and I have to stay with for a week to 10 days. Then the payout for box is $40.. NO DEAL
With the pick 4 the payout for all singles is $100.. with a double. $200.. and this is 50cent plays.. 
| | |
mid-Ohio United States Member #9 March 24, 2001 15962 Posts Offline | | Posted: May 19, 2012, 11:05 am - IP Logged | |
I'm still looking for someone who has a winning system with few numbers to play, but still can't find that, it's hard to make money if you play 30 numbers or more a day !!! Systems and tips were sold against hard cash in the gambling world. A roulette system could easily be sold for 400 and much more. I suppose that a good lotterysystem is worth thousands. Actually, a lottery system that only break even would have value to some people. I've read about people buying winning lottery tickets at near their value after taxes and cashing them in and paying the taxes in a money laundering scheme. Such a program could make money laundering easier for those people. * The fundamentals of winning a lottery jackpot * * play a lottery you can win *
| | |
United States Member #5437 June 30, 2004 23638 Posts Offline | | Posted: May 19, 2012, 11:05 am - IP Logged | |
Nope , not life changing.. but an extra $300/$500 a week for little time doing what I love isn't bad either. 
| | |
williamson county United States Member #119097 November 14, 2011 1218 Posts Offline | | Posted: May 19, 2012, 12:46 pm - IP Logged | |
Nope , not life changing.. but an extra $300/$500 a week for little time doing what I love isn't bad either. 
I agree 100%......if i make 300.00/500.00 a week.......and i had to spend 100.00 to get it.....that my dear IS a winning system........so true tntea.... | | |
United States Member #5437 June 30, 2004 23638 Posts Offline | | Posted: May 19, 2012, 3:33 pm - IP Logged | |
I agree 100%......if i make 300.00/500.00 a week.......and i had to spend 100.00 to get it.....that my dear IS a winning system........so true tntea.... I am not paying $100 a week.. The most $30 | | |
Florida United States Member #128104 May 16, 2012 63 Posts Offline | | Posted: May 20, 2012, 1:06 pm - IP Logged | |
Personally I don't care for either game because of their daily drawings which makes keeping their data files updated a lot of work. Besides, their payouts aren't life changing. Jackpot games with two or three drawings per week are more my speed since there's time between drawings to think about my next move. I'm with you on the frequency part. The Florida Cash 3 and Play 4, both at twice a day, are too much for me to try to keep track of. I've decided to focus on Fantasy 5 because the odds are much better than the Florida Lotto, and while I'm trying to come up with a system that works, the odds of some small money prizes along the way are a lot better. The drawback is that F5 is a once daily lottery. Optimally I'd like to find some numbers to plug into a 10-20 line wheel a couple of times a week. If I don't feel I've really got anything to work with that day I'll just buy 5 QP's and be done with it. That should limit me to about $45-$65 a week...a managable sum for me to play while educating myself on F5. And to the OP's original question... If I come up with a winning system I'll share it selectively after I'm convinced it really is a winning system and I've moved onto working a different lottery. I'm going to work on Fantasy 5 now and if I come up with something that works I'll see if/how it can work with the Florida Lotto (bigger jackpots), but only after I've cashed in nicely on Fantasy 5. Not to say I wouldn't share ideas along the way, but I don't see a reason to share a system that is incomplete and unproven, nor a reason to share a proven system only to have to split a jackpot with someone else that didn't contribute to the system. | | |
|