MA United States
Member #89,091
March 30, 2010
245 Posts
Offline
RL:
Working now. Just changing one filter really changes a lot as far as picks are concened. Just need a way to zoom in on which filters to modify taht is what is going to take time to figure out.
bgonçalves Brasil
Member #92,560
June 9, 2010
3,780 Posts
Offline
Hellorlrandomlogic,ispossible aftersetting all the parametersof the filters,with theresultscadatromoreDE200or more,ask,generatingbetting withfilters butno more thanthe suitor trioofprevious draws,,bet youhaveallfournumbersof drawsanteriosis excluded.You can putthis filtertogether?Thanksrl
United States
Member #59,352
March 13, 2008
5,626 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by dr san on May 24, 2012
Hellorlrandomlogic,ispossible aftersetting all the parametersof the filters,with theresultscadatromoreDE200or more,ask,generatingbetting withfilters butno more thanthe suitor trioofprevious draws,,bet youhaveallfournumbersof drawsanteriosis excluded.You can putthis filtertogether?Thanksrl
dr san
If i understand correctly, the program already allows you to do this. Use the wheel option then set the Low/high
values to accept or reject however many of those numbers you want or don't want to use. You can use as many
cells as you want. You could enter the last five draws, one set into each cell then set the low / high values to limit
or completely block them by setting the low =0 and high= 0 or any combination you want to use. I think I understand
bgonçalves Brasil
Member #92,560
June 9, 2010
3,780 Posts
Offline
Hellorl randomologic,isthusin a lottery39/5, or49/9or60/6, it is verydifficult to repeatfournumbersof theprevious results,my limitisup to 3numbersof theprevious results, thenrlIfyour programafter filtering,up tofourbetshaveequalnumbersin the last 300resultsisexcluded, the maximumisthreenumbersof theprevious resultsExampleyourprogram generatedthis bet(one)=0512,26,35,39Andthe resulthaspassed148=0512 3536 394haveequalnumbersbetup =05,12,35,39, thenthis bet=26.35051239 hasto bedeletedbecause it hasfournumbersof theprevious resultsthe limitis3numbers
United States
Member #59,352
March 13, 2008
5,626 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by dr san on May 24, 2012
Hellorl randomologic,isthusin a lottery39/5, or49/9or60/6, it is verydifficult to repeatfournumbersof theprevious results,my limitisup to 3numbersof theprevious results, thenrlIfyour programafter filtering,up tofourbetshaveequalnumbersin the last 300resultsisexcluded, the maximumisthreenumbersof theprevious resultsExampleyourprogram generatedthis bet(one)=0512,26,35,39Andthe resulthaspassed148=0512 3536 394haveequalnumbersbetup =05,12,35,39, thenthis bet=26.35051239 hasto bedeletedbecause it hasfournumbersof theprevious resultsthe limitis3numbers
dr san
Just because it has not happened in the last so many draws does not mean that it can't happen. I don't analyze
numbers at all. The only time I ever look at the numbers themselves is when I fill out the betslips. I know this is
difficult for some people and it's a matter of choice. I have seen as many as 4 numbers hit from the previous draw.
The reason I play the methods I do is because most of the filters I use hit within a very small range that can be
somewhat easy to set. Maybe the hardest part of using DMP is to stop thinking in terms of numbers. Before I do
a setup I try to zone out and clear my mind of what I think will happen. I like to approach the game with the state
of mind that anything can and will happen then depend upon the current data to base my decisions. Many approach
the game with preconceived notions that something has to hit and what they end up doing is making the filters match
what they want to play instead of playing what the data indicates. It takes very little for me to set a draw out and
wait until a more opertune time, Once I make a setup if the lines returned go beyond what I feel AC can reduce without
loosing the nice prizes I will most likely hit the RSG button and run off 10 lines or just skip playing. I am always searching
for better algorithms to use in the suggestion and auto-cover options but other than that DM won't undergo any more
changes. I think it has everything that is needed to give the player a good chance of hitting a JP. Thanks for the suggestion
Los Angeles United States
Member #75,408
June 2, 2009
590 Posts
Offline
Hi RL,
Here is just a filter suggestion if you will ?
I posted the Lexicographic tread for the Mega Million game.
In red color is the Lexicographic number going up and in green the Lexicographic number going down. ( Compared to the last draw ).
By looking at this tread, on average, the Lexicographic number usualy go up 1 or 2 time and then 1 or 2 time down , ( it will go up 3 - 4 or 5 times but on rare occasion ).
So for the of the next game, people would select in that filter eather going up or going down.
Looking at the draw number 720 you will set up the filter as going down which would eliminate right there : 3,819 816 - 2,285 930 = 1,533 886
combinations in 1 filter, more than 1 third, which would avoid the other filters to select in that area.
United States
Member #59,352
March 13, 2008
5,626 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by frenchie on May 25, 2012
Hi RL,
Here is just a filter suggestion if you will ?
I posted the Lexicographic tread for the Mega Million game.
In red color is the Lexicographic number going up and in green the Lexicographic number going down. ( Compared to the last draw ).
By looking at this tread, on average, the Lexicographic number usualy go up 1 or 2 time and then 1 or 2 time down , ( it will go up 3 - 4 or 5 times but on rare occasion ).
So for the of the next game, people would select in that filter eather going up or going down.
Looking at the draw number 720 you will set up the filter as going down which would eliminate right there : 3,819 816 - 2,285 930 = 1,533 886
combinations in 1 filter, more than 1 third, which would avoid the other filters to select in that area.
That's it just a filter idea.
regards,
Serge.
Hi frenchie
I like you, think that the lexies are going to play a very important role in lottery selection in the future.
You may have noticed that I include the foward and reverse lexigraphic index values in the database.
The type of analysis that you use can if selected correctly be a very good reduction tool but I don't like
putting that many of my eggs in one basket so to speak. I tracked lexi position for a while but gave up
on this approach. The lexi is my #1 area of focus and has been for several years now and I have found
some very interesting ways of using them. Winsum has been working on this too and has made some
progress. I created the reverse lexi and using front pairs from both can often trap the winning set in a
very small list. The R-L-P option is a lexigraphical index based reduction program and although it is not
finished, some versions have very good hit rates with less than 25,000 lines reducing the matrix by as much
as 99% before even setting a single filter. Much of what I am working on right now has to do with processing
speed. I use a two stage generator the first of which generates the lexi value which is where the selection
processes are made before moving to the generation of sets. This allows me to process 5 million lines in a
few seconds before passing the information to the set generator. Having to wait on processing time is not
that big of deal except in the testing stages where one has to make thousands of runs. Anyway, thanks for
your input want to say that I think your moving in the right direction.