If anyone has trouble using the program I found the following information:
"Recently, we got several reports that the program's trial period expires after the first try. To overcome the problem we are issuing a general user name and password. You can use them to give the program a try, however, if you find yourself using the program on a regular basis, you are bound to pay for the program ($49 US) and to obtain your own user name and password.
User name: Trial registration
After you entered the user name and password, you need to exit the program and start it over again."
After reading the last few post if feel it nessary to post a few things that you may want to consider. The first may
seem bland, but the drawing is random. It is human nature to want to find some sort of order in the numbers but
I feel this is moving in the wrong direction. While patterns and trends may be common when using hindsight they
don't offer much concerning the next draw. Most neural networks or at least the good ones will state that they
are not designed to be used with random data. What we may see as a pattern, trend, etc.. is most likely just a
series of chance events that may or may not continue but if they do it is not because of anything that has happened
in the past. The chance that you will find enough information to allow you to predict the next set is almost null. DM
has no predictive qualities for a reason and is not intended to be used as a predictor but a tool. I have stated many
times that the next set drawn will come from the matrix, not the history. Understand this and you will understand DM
and have much better success. What happens most is a product of the matrix not the system used to generate the
numbers. The draw history should be treated as a mini matrix and the analysis used by DM is geared 100% around
this basic concept. Let me explain, mega millions has 3,819,816 combos of 5 number sets. Of these sets of numbers
1,701,056 have at least one digit 6, so 1,701,056 / 3,819,816 = 44.5%. In the last 706 drawings there have been 315
drawings that had at least one digit 6, 315/706=44.6% so we can conclude that the drawings have followed the matrix
to within .1 percent. If we know that 44.5 percent of the sets in the matrix have at least one digit 6 it is easy to
understand why 44.6 of the drawings also have at least one digit 6. It would be nice it 4.4 draws out of every 10 would
have at least one 6 in the set and many times it will. This however is not always the case, in the last 10 drawings the digit
6 has only come out twice. 7 times in the last 20 draws and 15 in the last 30, 15/30=50%. We can see that digit 6 shows
a deficit for the last 10 drawings but is above it's average for the last 30. Many of the filters used by DM will follow this
rule and you will see clusters of shows and no-shows. If 4.4 of every 10 draws had at least one digit 6 then the drawing
would not be random. This is the quandry we face in trying to make a setup but if we think about this we can make some
very good guesses. We often face two choices with every filter setting, either the value is waxing or waining. To put it
simple the value is ready to start a cluster or moving out of one. If these clusters formed a perfect sine wave then the draw
would not be random so while the values do cluster the trough between them is not stable and fluctuates back and forth.
On a even larger scale if the fluctuations happened at regular intervales then the draw would not be random and could be
predicted. You should be getting a better understanding of how I see the data. Random will defy logic and that is why many
times the draw will do the exact oppsite of what we expect. If we know what it takes to be random then we can start to
play randomly, I am not talking about just pulling a value out of the air and playing it, I am saying, play some of what makes
random, random. If we base our decisions on a pattern we are sure to be made a fool by the next drawing. It takes a while
to be able to tune your mind to analyze the data in this way but take another look at the tools I have provided and they should
make a little more sense. Throw a little of what makes random random into your selections. I admit that it takes a while to
learn to do this but when you find your self making selections that don't make any real logical sense without having to think
about them then you are well on your way.
Working on my Ph.D. "University of hard Knocks"