You last visited May 24, 2013, 9:57 am All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00) | LP and the LotteriesUnited States Member #115823 August 28, 2011 125 Posts Offline | | Posted: May 25, 2012, 5:29 pm - IP Logged | |
If it were possible (and I'm skeptical, of course!), I'd rather find a method that would consistently help me win smaller tier prizes...say somewhere in the $500-$1,000 range. The theory being that I could stay under the radar a little more than someone who won a multi-million dollar jackpot. Of course, I wouldn't complain if I won a giant jackpot. But I'd still be happy to hit smaller tier prizes more frequently. | | |
egg harbor twp.south jersey shore United States Member #112990 June 29, 2011 2521 Posts Online | | Posted: May 25, 2012, 6:21 pm - IP Logged | |
voted no on the the effect, but yes, if you could win $500, consistently and stay "under the radar" that would be nice. heard tell, from some at the race track, they been doing this for years, if thats true, how come they look like a bum ? unless...... maybe thats part of being under the radar ? Extraordinary Popular Delusions & the Madness of Crowds -- Charles Mackay LL.D. | | |
Belgium Member #128228 May 19, 2012 96 Posts Offline | | Posted: May 25, 2012, 6:29 pm - IP Logged | |
voted no on the the effect, but yes, if you could win $500, consistently and stay "under the radar" that would be nice. heard tell, from some at the race track, they been doing this for years, if thats true, how come they look like a bum ? unless...... maybe thats part of being under the radar ? haymaker is right... | | |
Oklahoma United States Member #82920 November 12, 2009 3466 Posts Offline | | Posted: May 25, 2012, 7:19 pm - IP Logged | |
I believe there may have been a winner here, just saying. me too.... Win BIG everyone..... I Love Pink & Green....1908 | | |
United States Member #124626 March 16, 2012 1423 Posts Offline | | Posted: May 25, 2012, 9:26 pm - IP Logged | |
I believe there may have been a winner here, just saying. or 2 | | |
5+1 Winner Arizona United States Member #116287 September 7, 2011 14810 Posts Offline | | Posted: May 26, 2012, 12:20 pm - IP Logged | |
If it were possible (and I'm skeptical, of course!), I'd rather find a method that would consistently help me win smaller tier prizes...say somewhere in the $500-$1,000 range. The theory being that I could stay under the radar a little more than someone who won a multi-million dollar jackpot. Of course, I wouldn't complain if I won a giant jackpot. But I'd still be happy to hit smaller tier prizes more frequently. say somewhere in the $500-$1,000 range. Yeah, its called getting a job....... just sayin 
| | |
Aruba Member #123712 February 27, 2012 1799 Posts Online | | Posted: May 26, 2012, 1:50 pm - IP Logged | |
| | |
upstate NY United States Member #108819 March 31, 2011 434 Posts Offline | | Posted: May 26, 2012, 4:27 pm - IP Logged | |
say somewhere in the $500-$1,000 range. Yeah, its called getting a job....... just sayin
Indeed.  I don't think the people responsible were LP members, but players in Massachusetts cracked the Cash WinFall game, leading officials there to close the loophole that had been exploited last year and eventually end the game earlier this year. If a winning system were indeed posted here at LP, it probably wouldn't remain a winning system for long. However, to answer the rest of the question, I don't think lottery officials have anything to fear from us puttering around. | | |
5+1 Winner Arizona United States Member #116287 September 7, 2011 14810 Posts Offline | | Posted: May 26, 2012, 5:11 pm - IP Logged | |
Indeed. I don't think the people responsible were LP members, but players in Massachusetts cracked the Cash WinFall game, leading officials there to close the loophole that had been exploited last year and eventually end the game earlier this year. If a winning system were indeed posted here at LP, it probably wouldn't remain a winning system for long. However, to answer the rest of the question, I don't think lottery officials have anything to fear from us puttering around. Great story, I just read about it. Couple heads into town and buys $307,000. worth of tickets. lol. I'm surprised they didn't cancel the draw and keep the money. lol. Now they are only allowed to spend $5000. per day, per retailer. So they would need to make 62 stops to make the same purchase again. lol. | | |
Connecticut United States Member #62108 May 29, 2008 16635 Posts Online | | Posted: May 30, 2012, 8:06 pm - IP Logged | |
Hi, A lot of methods, information, and predictions about lotteries is posted at the LP. Are lotteries adjusting thier methods based on predictions and what is said at the LP? Is to much information being given out at the LP? If a winning system were posted at the LP, would it stay a winning system? There's no such thing as too much information...it's just a question of what we are capable of intaking mentally. Are lotteries adjusting thier methods based on predictions and what is said at the LP? as far as P3 goes,I don't think it's possible.Although I would hate to be an offshore P3 site these days.They gotta be getting spanked by folks who come through here. lol "...Life is not a matter of holding good cards,but sometimes playing a poor hand well... 'Fortune Cookie wisdom' | | |
United States Member #59839 March 13, 2008 1729 Posts Offline | | Posted: May 30, 2012, 8:14 pm - IP Logged | |
Hi, A lot of methods, information, and predictions about lotteries is posted at the LP. Are lotteries adjusting thier methods based on predictions and what is said at the LP? Is to much information being given out at the LP? If a winning system were posted at the LP, would it stay a winning system? JKING I would bet money they read the post here at LP. Maybe not the people at the state gaming office but the people who build the RNG's, scratchers, etc... are. 99% of stuff here is of little use other than day to day trends but if you find something that really works, keep it to yourself. I don't think that they pay much attention to pick-3 but the big games where a lottery could go bust in one drawing would I think be of much interest. Lets sat that I could produce a algorithm that could hit 4 positional numbers about 1 in 100 attempts. Leaving the player to have to choose one number for the third position. Again lets say that I gave the numbers 5-23 -- 45-54 leaving only 22 numbers to fill in the 3rd number. Lets say again that 1000 people used this information each draw. lets further say that out of these 1000 players that 200 manage to hit the third number for that draw. I think it would be a bit of a problem for them to come up with $200,000,000 to pay the second level prizes let alone the 4of5 and with something like this the JP would have a good chance to being hit too. Not saying I do and not saying I don't but if I did I would never post it. I kind of like playing the lottery. RL Working on my Ph.D. "University of hard Knocks" 
| | |
United States Member #59839 March 13, 2008 1729 Posts Offline | | Posted: May 30, 2012, 8:51 pm - IP Logged | |
The one thing I do find that is odd here at LP is how many new people show up and assume this is a board of jackpot winners and ask what numbers they should play. Maybe some new members wronly assume people who have played lotteries for a while and post so much about them must know how to win them. It's only after they get some advice from them that they learn the truth, lottery players don't necessarily get smarter with experience. RJOh I agree, many go the other way, RL Working on my Ph.D. "University of hard Knocks"
| | |
United States Member #124626 March 16, 2012 1423 Posts Offline | | Posted: June 3, 2012, 12:56 am - IP Logged | |
The one thing I do find that is odd here at LP is how many new people show up and assume this is a board of jackpot winners and ask what numbers they should play. Maybe some new members wronly assume people who have played lotteries for a while and post so much about them must know how to win them. It's only after they get some advice from them that they learn the truth, lottery players don't necessarily get smarter with experience. Wait... you mean everyone here HASN'T won 7 or more jackpots??? | | |
Texas United States Member #86178 January 30, 2010 1016 Posts Offline | | Posted: June 3, 2012, 9:31 pm - IP Logged | |
"To me even hitting a str8 for 10K would be considered a jackpot. ....thats why i suppose box is a good idea " If that's the case Bone I'm already a jackpot winner. I have post many times that the best winning strategy is NOT playing and thats why I withheld all my lottery spending and saved up over $16K in a few short years. Make no mistake, I can still play 2 lines on every draw and only spend $520. in 5 years. We have a computer programmer here who simulated 175,000 lines per draw and GAVE UP because it was such a loosing proposition. So much for "winning systems" better save your money J. If he cant get it done with 1.4 million per month, what is a $400. a month systematization goin ta doo??? Regarding your last three sentences...this is why I've maintained my position of playing the least as possible within reason. A person can sit down and come up with all those combinations which will look very, very good on a computer screen. In the end, it's still only a drop in the bucket for the total amount of combinations in the game. This, and, the fact that (1) number stands between winning or losing it all...which I'm basing on matching (5) numbers for the $200K+ prize. Miss that fifth number and bye-bye $175K for a single draw...literally. On the other hand, the winning combination just could be in the mix of 'em...who knows? I'd much rather be very, very lucky with a little and win than very, very foolish with a lot and lose. L.L. | | |
United States Member #4963 May 30, 2004 3871 Posts Offline | | Posted: June 4, 2012, 1:23 am - IP Logged | |
If it were possible (and I'm skeptical, of course!), I'd rather find a method that would consistently help me win smaller tier prizes...say somewhere in the $500-$1,000 range. The theory being that I could stay under the radar a little more than someone who won a multi-million dollar jackpot. Of course, I wouldn't complain if I won a giant jackpot. But I'd still be happy to hit smaller tier prizes more frequently. NSV: "LET DOWN UR BUCKET" "DRINK">>>>>UR>>>>>game?????>>>>>>LP<<<can't pick UR game LP can't<<<<<UR>>>>>game talent<<<<<LP>KAN>giveUtool$$$$$$
| | |
|