Despite the fact that you are correct, that you didn't outright call him dumb, you must recognize that you've been implying it for some time now.
Context matters. And you can pick and choose from your past words as much as you want, but saying things like "a buffoon could get better odds" and replying to his comment by saying "he says the dumbest things" when what he was saying was actually completely accurate makes you look dumb.
Statements like "I have better odds" and "I never claimed to know the fundementals of mathemetics" directly contradict each other. So I guess you could figure it out.
If you can't work out the odds of a draw 4 out of 8 game, then why should anybody trust your claim that you have better odds? It's illogical to do believe you, and it's illogical for you to make contradictary claims.
Oh I forgot, your mind doesn't work that way. Fair enough. Your mind doesn't work with proof or logic. If that's the case, then how can you claim it's undisputable fact that you have better odds?