You last visited May 20, 2013, 9:41 pm All times shown are Eastern Time (GMT-5:00) | Straight hit producer p-3 systemFlorida United States Member #67077 October 30, 2008 3207 Posts Online | | Posted: August 16, 2012, 9:56 pm - IP Logged | |
Using tonight's florida eve winner 346 as the input, the potential winning numbers for tomorrow would hopefully be one of the following, 459-599-739-759-399-595 Onlymoney, Can you do it step by step, one more time ? When I did the 346 , I entered as 364 put in deflate and got this Tier 3 739(739,793) 284(284,248) 459(459,495) 904(904,940) Tier 2 599(599) 044(044) 759(759) 204(204) 399(399) 844(844) 559(595) 004(040) How did you narrow down to just these 459-599-739-759-399-595 Thanks Carlig | | |
United States Member #128800 June 2, 2012 2700 Posts Online | | Posted: August 16, 2012, 10:40 pm - IP Logged | |
Onlymoney, Can you do it step by step, one more time ? When I did the 346 , I entered as 364 put in deflate and got this Tier 3 739(739,793) 284(284,248) 459(459,495) 904(904,940) Tier 2 599(599) 044(044) 759(759) 204(204) 399(399) 844(844) 559(595) 004(040) How did you narrow down to just these 459-599-739-759-399-595 Thanks Carlig Input 364: | 487 | 253 | 599 | | 425 | 859 | 739 | | 459 | 755 | | 429 | 459 | 739 | 759 | | 248 | 873 | 399 | 952 | | 495 | 853 | 852 | 399 | | 455 | 759 | | 458 | 559 | | 595 | 599 |
Since I couldn't find a program to match pairs, I did it manually by counting the pairs and keeping the highest counts. Right off the bat you can see that the 59 pair had a count of 10 matches in any form. And of course the 739 qualified as the two combos minimum in the parentheses rule., as did the 459 which qualified for the pareanthesis rule and the high count of 59 pairs. I threw in 399 just for the heck of it because it had a 9 in there considering the high count was 59, and it had the 39 in 739, so i included it to cover all my bases. As you can see, the rest of the combos in Tier 3 also had the two minimum combos in the parentheses rule, but I didn't include them for two reasons. First reason, I'm only looking mostly for the highest pair count altogether such as the 59 pair, and secondly to reduce the cost as much as possible. In my 20 or so day test last night I focused on the matching pairs and that's where the success of this system was. | | |
Florida United States Member #67077 October 30, 2008 3207 Posts Online | | Posted: August 16, 2012, 10:50 pm - IP Logged | |
Input 364: | 487 | 253 | 599 | | 425 | 859 | 739 | | 459 | 755 | | 429 | 459 | 739 | 759 | | 248 | 873 | 399 | 952 | | 495 | 853 | 852 | 399 | | 455 | 759 | | 458 | 559 | | 595 | 599 |
Since I couldn't find a program to match pairs, I did it manually by counting the pairs and keeping the highest counts. Right off the bat you can see that the 59 pair had a count of 10 matches in any form. And of course the 739 qualified as the two combos minimum in the parentheses rule., as did the 459 which qualified for the pareanthesis rule and the high count of 59 pairs. I threw in 399 just for the heck of it because it had a 9 in there considering the high count was 59, and it had the 39 in 739, so i included it to cover all my bases. As you can see, the rest of the combos in Tier 3 also had the two minimum combos in the parentheses rule, but I didn't include them for two reasons. First reason, I'm only looking mostly for the highest pair count altogether such as the 59 pair, and secondly to reduce the cost as much as possible. In my 20 or so day test last night I focused on the matching pairs and that's where the success of this system was. Thank You. So if I get excel to turn these into pairs and count pairs , then I would match that to the combos and go from there . Am I on the right track ? CG | | |
United States Member #128800 June 2, 2012 2700 Posts Online | | Posted: August 16, 2012, 11:01 pm - IP Logged | |
Remember, it doesn't hit everyday, but pretty often, so it may skip tomorrow especially because of the double whammy lol Fo tomorrow's prediction, i usually like to use eve to eve or mid to mid only, but I've seen it hit mid to eve and vice versa, however in my short test I saw more of eve to eve and mid to mid, but considering the few combos each draw mid and eve produce with this sytem, i need to cover my bases and can afford to, so I will do both mid today and eve today for tomorrow's predictions. Until I have more time to see which way works better, i will do both for now. Today's mid was 973, so input is 937, | 050 | 826 | 162 | | 081 | 526 | 062 | | 022 | 021 | | 086 | 026 | 066 | 026 | | 805 | 506 | 626 | 618 | | 062 | 526 | 528 | 662 | | 021 | 022 | | 025 | 122 | | 261 | 262 |
26 has 11 counts which is the highest count and that's what we are looking for. However, 02 has a count of 9, so we must be careful not to get tempted. So to make myself happy I will combine the both for only one combo as 026, 022 and 226 boxed just in case. But we will focus on the highest count which is 26. So for tomorrow's prediction based on 937 we'll play 026-262-226-261-022-662. I used up all my free trial for the deflator so I did it now manually. Eve winner tonight was 957, so we use 975 input, | 098 | 864 | 100 | | 081 | 960 | 840 | | 060 | 861 | | 080 | 060 | 840 | 860 | | 809 | 984 | 400 | 018 | | 006 | 964 | 968 | 400 | | 061 | 860 | | 069 | 160 | | 601 | 600 |
06 has a count of 11 and 08 is second behind with a count of 8, but I will focus once again on the high count which is 06. 060-061-069-860 | | |
United States Member #128800 June 2, 2012 2700 Posts Online | | Posted: August 16, 2012, 11:02 pm - IP Logged | |
Thank You. So if I get excel to turn these into pairs and count pairs , then I would match that to the combos and go from there . Am I on the right track ? CG Exactly, If the highest count pair is 12 for example, you would play all combos with 06 in them. | | |
Florida United States Member #67077 October 30, 2008 3207 Posts Online | | Posted: August 16, 2012, 11:25 pm - IP Logged | |
Exactly, If the highest count pair is 12 for example, you would play all combos with 06 in them. Dang, and I thought I "got it " but guess I dont If the highest pair frequency is the pair 12 , how does that tell me to play the digit 6 ? Sorry | | |
United States Member #128800 June 2, 2012 2700 Posts Online | | Posted: August 16, 2012, 11:27 pm - IP Logged | |
Dang, and I thought I "got it " but guess I dont If the highest pair frequency is the pair 12 , how does that tell me to play the digit 6 ? Sorry My bad, I meant, 06 having a high count of 12 as an example. | | |
United States Member #128800 June 2, 2012 2700 Posts Online | | Posted: August 16, 2012, 11:28 pm - IP Logged | |
Dang, and I thought I "got it " but guess I dont If the highest pair frequency is the pair 12 , how does that tell me to play the digit 6 ? Sorry Long day and beer kicking in  | | |
United States Member #128800 June 2, 2012 2700 Posts Online | | Posted: August 16, 2012, 11:29 pm - IP Logged | |
My bad, I meant, 06 having a high count of 12 as an example. The high count can be any number, not just 12. I just want to make that clear  | | |
Florida United States Member #67077 October 30, 2008 3207 Posts Online | | Posted: August 16, 2012, 11:36 pm - IP Logged | |
The high count can be any number, not just 12. I just want to make that clear  You just trying to mess with my brain lol Thats okay, Next wuestion for this you consider 15 and 51 the same pair correct ?? CG | | |
United States Member #128800 June 2, 2012 2700 Posts Online | | Posted: August 16, 2012, 11:40 pm - IP Logged | |
You just trying to mess with my brain lol Thats okay, Next wuestion for this you consider 15 and 51 the same pair correct ?? CG Ha Ha, nah, i wasn't messing with ya, my brain had a short  Yes 51 is 15. | | |
United States Member #128800 June 2, 2012 2700 Posts Online | | Posted: August 16, 2012, 11:44 pm - IP Logged | |
Note: I realize the title of this thread says STRAIGHT, so based on my latest findings, only boxed yes, but multiple boxes work as well as a once in a while straight. Box hits add up. So the only prudent thing to do is to make bets like so, 50/50 bx/st. | | |
Florida United States Member #67077 October 30, 2008 3207 Posts Online | | Posted: August 16, 2012, 11:50 pm - IP Logged | |
Im going to play around and see if I can come up with something , but no guarentees Carlig | | |
Florida United States Member #67077 October 30, 2008 3207 Posts Online | | Posted: August 16, 2012, 11:57 pm - IP Logged | |
Only one more question , I promise ( for Now ) if the combo was 515 pairs are 51 15 55 so would you be counting that as " 2 " on the 51 ? another example combo is 222 pairs 22 22 22 So would I be adding 3 to the 22 pair count ?? CG | | |
United States Member #128800 June 2, 2012 2700 Posts Online | | Posted: August 17, 2012, 12:07 am - IP Logged | |
Only one more question , I promise ( for Now ) if the combo was 515 pairs are 51 15 55 so would you be counting that as " 2 " on the 51 ? another example combo is 222 pairs 22 22 22 So would I be adding 3 to the 22 pair count ?? CG You can ask me enless questions. Plese don't hesitate. if the combo was 515 pairs are 51 15 55 so would you be counting that as " 2 " on the 51 ? No With the 222, only one 22, not 3. | | |
|