Look up for Pool size trend, choose a string

United States
Member #116363
September 8, 2011
667 Posts
Offline

Posted: January 25, 2013, 7:38 pm - IP Logged

Quote: Originally posted by adobea78 on January 9, 2013

If you are very observant, you will realize that your draw digits comes in three sections of the Pool (0-9), ie

0-6, 0-7 and 0-8, this info reduces your picks from the get go and your focus is narrowed. Lets take Arkansa data to locate your Pool trend: from data below for P3, the pool 0-7 is trending(all draw digits between 0-7 indicated with red color)), so choose the string $02714536$(0-7), for size 0-8 ($0218146357), 0-6 (0261435). For P4, you have 0-7(blue color) edging 0-8.

The string is a compressed key, cutting all steps(parameters) of workout , and is effective reference point to increase your odds with less picks. I have already discussed it via http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/254762 , but I'll do a quick illustration to select picks for this Ark. data(P3) and P4.

Format:date>draw>String> deleted Postional x(when you deleted a digit from string, maintain its positon, eg , a deleted draw digits 652 from string 02714536 >256 and not 652, this becomes important when choosing x).

The whole concept is to reduce your choosen string by Historical draws to a minimum digits(3 for P3, 5 for P4).

Date draw string reduced $ del.positonal x

Dec 31 235 02714536 07146 2-5-3

Now take a note of reduced $07146 and see the next draws, you could make pairs 07-71-14-46 with x ,2-5-3

yielding picks 072-075-073, 712-715-713,142-145-143,462-465-463(12picks), you may hit some box/str, but is

not cost effective if you want a nice payout( I prefer less hit with Higher payout !). So let's continue to reduce the string further with draw 775 :

dec 31 775 07146 0146 7

Now your $ is reduced to 0146, you can form triads 014-146 or pairs 01-14-46 against x(maintain how x is deleted, 2>5>3>7), but I prefer to reduced further with draw of Jan 1:

Jan 1 517 0146 046 1

Now with reduced 046, this where my betting strategy comes in (str or box?,my x is certain to come from deleted x, because my pool is 0-7 ). Do not get the urge to consider anything outside 0-7, if you do that,then you're wavering, you may miss a hit by one digit and say to yourself ' so close', so close is a lost!(All am saying is, keep to your plan).

The good thing about the string method is, you bet when comfortable without distraction. Now I can further reduced

046 with draw 008 of Jan 1 to string $46(str/box).

Now lets look at P4 , we have size 0-7(be mindful of draw stats:% of 1234,1122 ....etc):

Date draw string reduced $ Del. pos x

Dec 31 4307 02714536 2156 0-7-4-3

2273 02714536 01456 2-7-3-

Jan 1 0330 02714536 271456 0-3

Stop and look at your trend of string reduction(you need max of 5 digits for your triads), lets use draw 4299 of

Jan 1, to reduced all string from dec 31: 156 x, 2

0156 x, 4

7156 x,2 4

Now choose reduced 4 digits string 0156 and 7156 and make triads with 2,4 . Is better do to more test with P4

for median time.

Summary : Look for draw digits range> choose a Pool size> choose String

Reduce String to minumum digits via past draw digits

Reduced $ into pairs, combo with deleted POSITIONAL digits> Picks to bet.

All aspect of the string method is MOSTLY SEQUENTIAL, this info reduces your picks, good luck.

Comments to enhance this ideal is welcome, blant critique is never a solution!

Ark data

Pick 3		Pick 4
Midday	Evening	Midday	Evening
Wed, Jan 9, 2013	850
Tue, Jan 8, 2013	804	739	5680	4435
Mon, Jan 7, 2013	155	989	1342	8955
Sun, Jan 6, 2013	202
Sat, Jan 5, 2013	143	542	5088	8605
Fri, Jan 4, 2013	101	571	3761	1276
Thu, Jan 3, 2013	822	134	0819	8441
Wed, Jan 2, 2013	836	614	6418	4734
Tue, Jan 1, 2013	517	008	0330	4299
Mon, Dec 31, 2012	235	775	4307	2273

Whatever method you use to develop/evolve your system or select picks, Predicted probabilities related to momentary data distibution(draw trends within certain time frame, find parameters to locate such trends, it could be sums, roots, pi,mirrors etc) is effective way to win a higher payout. This direction comes with patience, and modifying your waging style, because you are not dealing with absolute probability( a bit of stretch, absolute P is not real, Probabilty is always conditional!), but rather predicted P, based on created MOMENTARY DATA. Why is that your system APPEARS good during backtesting but different on actual draws? Is there a way to do FORWARDTESTING?(CRAzy,eh!), No, meaning, historical data is inept when dealing with Random events, the best way is calculate your odds on a created data.

Is all about ideals, keep comments to yourself if line of reasoning is finding flaws or qouting odds of the game but rather focus your response on 'Predicted probabilities on Momentary Data'.

NetConnect

Internet Domains, simple and cheap

Find a domain name:

Look up for Pool size trend, choose a string